On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 21:16:14 -0500
Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Running one locked to each system is really the only approach that makes
sense. There inevitably are minor differences in systems and trying to
average things out is not the best way to do it.
Might or might not be. At least for
The 2014 EFTF abstracts are available here: (55MB ZIP file)
http://www.eftf-2014.ch/media/EFTF-2014-USB-DRIVE_20140624.zip
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 21:16:14 -0500
Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Running one locked to each system is
Hi
On Dec 6, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 21:16:14 -0500
Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Running one locked to each system is really the only approach that makes
sense. There inevitably are minor differences in systems and trying to
average
Recall that beyond GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO and Big Dipper (COMPASS) you
also have WAAS/EGNOS and other SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems).
If you open up all of them, there is a lot of signals in the air.
Also, GPS L2C and L5 signals is already there.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/06/2014 01:16
Hi
On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org
wrote:
Recall that beyond GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO and Big Dipper (COMPASS) you also
have WAAS/EGNOS and other SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems).
If you open up all of them, there is a lot of signals in
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:47:54 +0100
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Also, GPS L2C and L5 signals is already there.
AFAIK there is no satellite with L5 capabilities in space yet.
Also L2C is still marked as unhealthy.
Attila Kinali
--
I pity people
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 12:49:53 +0100
Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@gmail.com wrote:
The 2014 EFTF abstracts are available here: (55MB ZIP file)
http://www.eftf-2014.ch/media/EFTF-2014-USB-DRIVE_20140624.zip
The papers are also online, but only available to those who were
at the conference.
According to http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=1
the L2C and L5 signals are now available.
Edésio
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 03:18:25PM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:47:54 +0100
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Also, GPS L2C and
On 12/6/14, 6:18 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:47:54 +0100
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Also, GPS L2C and L5 signals is already there.
AFAIK there is no satellite with L5 capabilities in space yet.
Also L2C is still marked as unhealthy.
You can use them as additional nav birds too.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/06/2014 03:09 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Recall that beyond GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO and Big Dipper (COMPASS) you also have
WAAS/EGNOS and other SBAS
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 12:35:16 -0200
Edesio Costa e Silva time-n...@tardis.net.br wrote:
According to http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=1
the L2C and L5 signals are now available.
Oh.must have missed that.
Thanks!
Attila Kinali
--
I pity people
Attila,
On 12/06/2014 03:18 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:47:54 +0100
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Also, GPS L2C and L5 signals is already there.
AFAIK there is no satellite with L5 capabilities in space yet.
There is at least 7 of them now. See
HI
Use these systems for navigation? What a silly idea. I’m *sure* they are mainly
intend to deliver precise timing to people’s basement labs :)
Bob
On Dec 6, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org
wrote:
You can use them as additional nav birds too.
Cheers,
Partial recovery of Galileo constellation:
http://www.southgatearc.org/news/2014/december/galileo_satellite_recovered_and_transmitting_navigation_signals.htm
Edésio
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Dumb Question Time ...
Is the Galileo available in North America or only for our overseas
brethren ?
Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ
On 12/5/2014 8:16 AM, Edesio Costa e Silva wrote:
Partial recovery of Galileo constellation:
It's a global system and modern receivers are already capable of
augmenting GPS solutions with measurements from Galileo satellites.
Henry
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Richard Solomon w1...@earthlink.net wrote:
Dumb Question Time ...
Is the Galileo available in North America or only for
Hi Dick,
Its available for everyone. It will be as global as GPS. But currently
under a system test phase. Three working satellites, one of the first four
has some problems. Whats the status of that one now? Two new launched in
August experienced a faulty orbit injection.
he...@pericynthion.org said:
It's a global system and modern receivers are already capable of augmenting
GPS solutions with measurements from Galileo satellites.
I've seen lots of comments about units that will use other than GPS
satellites, but I don't think I've seen any actual output from
Hi
On Dec 5, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:
he...@pericynthion.org said:
It's a global system and modern receivers are already capable of augmenting
GPS solutions with measurements from Galileo satellites.
I've seen lots of comments about units that will
On 05/12/14 22:40, Bob Camp wrote:
Typically they let you selectively enable each of the major systems. As you
enable more systems, you get more sat’s in each of the messages. For most
users, there is not a lot of reason to enable multiple systems. If you want UTC
sync’d to USNO you enable
Hi
On Dec 5, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Iain Young i...@g7iii.net wrote:
On 05/12/14 22:40, Bob Camp wrote:
Typically they let you selectively enable each of the major systems. As you
enable more systems, you get more sat’s in each of the messages. For most
users, there is not a lot of reason
kb...@n1k.org said:
Running one locked to each system is really the only approach that makes
sense. There inevitably are minor differences in systems and trying to
average things out is not the best way to do it.
Anybody have suggestions for a low cost receiver to run that test?
--
These
On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:
kb...@n1k.org said:
Running one locked to each system is really the only approach that makes
sense. There inevitably are minor differences in systems and trying to
average things out is not the best way to do it.
Hello,
One vendor we starts nimea strings with BD and GN instead of GP ie
$GPGGA,blab, blab becomes $BDGGA,blab and $GNGGA,blab
If all systems are selected and the receiver has enough of each system you can
have up to three $*GGA messages per update.
Link
On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:32 PM,
From: Hal Murray
I've seen lots of comments about units that will use other than GPS
satellites, but I don't think I've seen any actual output from one of them.
Is that just a gap in my toy collection or has reality not caught up with
the
marketing hype? (Or perhaps I just haven't looked in
25 matches
Mail list logo
