> On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > > kb...@n1k.org said: >> Running one locked to each system is really the only approach that makes >> sense. There inevitably are minor differences in systems and trying to >> average things out is not the best way to do it. > > Anybody have suggestions for a low cost receiver to run that test?
Low cost … hmmm …. The stuff we normally buy is surplus / used. That makes it the 10 cents or 1 cent on the dollar that we’re used to paying. This stuff (by definition) is brand new and fresh on the market. LTE-Lite will do QZSS .. might not have sat’s overhead in your location :) Google suggests: Meinberg has the GLN180PEX that will do Glonass timing Teseo-3 / Teseo-2 do various constellations uBlox 6 claims GPS / Glonass / QZSS http://www.u-blox.com/images/downloads/Product_Docs/u-blox6-GPS-GLONASS-QZSS-V14_ReceiverDescriptionProtocolSpec_Public_(GPS.G6-SW-12013).pdf A bunch of Garmin stuff will do Glonass https://support.garmin.com/support/searchSupport/case.faces?caseId=%7Ba3bcf150-1fa1-11e1-73d0-000000000000%7D Furuno GT-87 has Glonass and QZSS NovAtel OEM6 has Glonass, Galileo, and BeiDou Bob > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
