of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rigol scopes
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:18 +, shali...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why the default mode for a DSO should
-nuts] Rigol scopes
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:18 +, shali...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why the default mode for a DSO should always be pulse detect or
whatever the manufacturer calls it, unless you know what you are doing. As
far as I know, all DSOs have this or an equivalent mode where the ADC
On 04/17/2012 06:38 AM, Robert Atkinson wrote:
I quite like the HP 546xx series 'scopes. An analog like interface but good
DSO facilities. My regular 'scope at home is a 54645D mixed signal. Ideal for
lower speed logic/anlog circuits and 8 bit PICs. Takes up a lot less space
than a 16500x
and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rigol scopes
Well, if you doubt aliasing issues, see the attached, downloaded from my
Tek TDS1002.
This is a simulator for LORAN-A
-John
===
___
time-nuts mailing list
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:18 +, shali...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why the default mode for a DSO should always be pulse detect or
whatever the manufacturer calls it, unless you know what you are doing. As far
as I know, all DSOs have this or an equivalent mode where the ADC runs at full
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:38:52 -0500, Bob Smither smit...@c-c-i.com
wrote:
On 04/17/2012 06:38 AM, Robert Atkinson wrote:
I quite like the HP 546xx series 'scopes. An analog like interface but good
DSO facilities. My regular 'scope at home is a 54645D mixed signal. Ideal for
lower speed
IMO, the Tek 7000s are just wonderful. Everything a scope should be,
especially if complemented by a Logic Analyzer.
The 5000s not so much.
-John
I also have Tek 7000 and 5000 series analog scopes, along with a older
Tek
digital (Oh! - am I becoming a collector? :-). These
From: gandal...@aol.com gandal...@aol.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012, 23:29
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rigol scopes
In a message dated 16/04/2012 22:15:50 GMT Daylight Time,
lstosk...@cox.net writes:
I bought one of the 50 MHz versions at Dayton last year. OK for my
In a message dated 16/04/2012 22:15:50 GMT Daylight Time,
lstosk...@cox.net writes:
I bought one of the 50 MHz versions at Dayton last year. OK for my needs.
Not mentioned here is that the difference between the 50 and 100 MHz
scopes is software control of roll off on the input. I
Hi John
Not sure if this a response to my post or if the timing's just coincidence,
either way I still contend the Rigols offer a lot of bangs per buck but
that one still has to be very aware of the limitations.
Never any free lunches, but the snacks are sometimes quite good value:-)
Please don't interpret what I said to mean that no 'scope is better than
an asian one.
Without question, any halfway capable product is far better than nothing.
But, IMO, a high end (used) analog scope beats the newer mid range digital
scopes.
Furtheremore, if you really don't know what you're
...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:11:57
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: j...@quikus.com, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rigol scopes
Please don't interpret what I said
lstoskopf@... writes:
I bought one of the 50 MHz versions at Dayton last year. OK for my needs.
Not mentioned here is that the difference between the 50 and 100 MHz scopes
is software control of roll off on the input. I haven't done it,
but procedure was available on the WEB on how to
13 matches
Mail list logo
