Hi,
Are there any updates to ESNI/ECHO to share as a draft or an update?
It's been a few months, so just wondering (even if there's not much to say).
thanks,
Rob
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> On 14 Feb 2020, at 22:03, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:46:56AM -0500, Michael D'Errico wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been a long time since I posted to this list but saw that the charter
>> is being updated and wanted to share an idea I had a while ago but
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:46:56AM -0500, Michael D'Errico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been a long time since I posted to this list but saw that the charter is
> being updated and wanted to share an idea I had a while ago but have not
> found the time to work on. The TL;DR is to deprecate
Great! I'll push it on over and continue reviewing.
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Nick Sullivan
> wrote:
>
> Carrick,
>
> Thank you for reading the document and identifying an embarrassingly
> difficult to parse motivating paragraph (with an annoying unclosed
> parenthesis to boot).
Carrick,
Thank you for reading the document and identifying an embarrassingly
difficult to parse motivating paragraph (with an annoying unclosed
parenthesis to boot). You've correctly identified the meaning it was trying
to convey and we'll happily review this as a PR here:
Ilari,
Thank you for identifying these errors in the document. There was no
intention to allow the client to constrict the server certificate's
algorithm with the delegated_credential extension, and no intention to
restrict the delegated credential's algorithm with the
signature_algorithms. Let
I support adoption
From: TLS On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:13 PM
To:
Subject: [TLS] Call for Adoption: draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange" have asked for adoption of their draft as
a WG item. Please state whether you
I would like to see this work adopted by the working group. I think the
language issues can be addressed after adoption.
However, given the disagreements raised, I would also be okay if the
adoption decision was postponed until after discussion in Vancouver.
Jonathan
On Thu., Feb. 13, 2020,
Hi,
It's been a long time since I posted to this list but saw that the charter is
being updated and wanted to share an idea I had a while ago but have not found
the time to work on. The TL;DR is to deprecate TLS and rebuild security on top
of DTLS. With DTLS, you have encrypted packets, so
Sorry, I had meant to reply to this but forgot...
On 13/02/2020 21:34, Nick Sullivan wrote:
> Hi Justice,
>
> Thanks for reaching out and welcome. At this point, another implementation
> of draft-02 wouldn't hurt, but it also likely won't contribute much to the
> development process for this
10 matches
Mail list logo
