On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:02:45 +0200 Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Some ISP use this trick like antispam solution:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks
It's yet another half-baked(TM) solution to the spam problem. From my
experience, more than 80% of the mail received by machines acting as
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:10:23 -0400 Rick Macdougall wrote:
Actually, if the primary MX does not respond, qmail will try the
higher MX. If the primary MX responds but temp fails the message,
qmail will try the same MX again later.
That's correct, thanks!
--
Adi Pircalabu
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:02:45 +0200 Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Some ISP use this trick like antispam solution:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks
It's yet another half-baked(TM) solution to the spam problem. From my
experience, more than 80% of the mail received
Some ISP use this trick like antispam solution:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks
But the wiki page says that with qmail remote server you can have some
problem.
And in fact i have find that qmail in some situations is unable to delivery
the email in this situations.
Why? Is
RAID 5 ? Fast ? Oh come on !
The performance of any RAID array is very low comparing to a BUSY mail
server if data integrity is an important aspect.
I'd recommend only the Raid 10 which does a strip over two mirrors.
Meaning you have 4 drives, they each are in a RAID 1 array and the two
RAID 1
Hello,
I'm looking for some advice about webmail clients. I'm still using sqwebmail
because it's very lighter and accesses maildirs directly.
Now I'm gonna move to a new server, and I'm looking for a new webmail client
for my toaster. With more than 20,000 users accessing daily the webmail, I'm
Yes we did.
On about 5 machines, 2.6.15 to 2.6.22, gentoo everywhere.
Roman
Jeff Koch napsal(a):
Has anyone successfully setup Bill's toaster with SATA RAID? A year or
two ago we setup a toaster with a two drive 3ware IDE RAID mirroring
setup and the performance was awful. Maybe it was
On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Jose wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for some advice about webmail clients. I'm still using
sqwebmail because it's very lighter and accesses maildirs directly.
Now I'm gonna move to a new server, and I'm looking for a new
webmail client for my toaster. With more than
Thanks for the picture Bill.
I'll try the Openmail, it's perl, there's a patch to access maildirs
directly instead fo imap and pop3 connections, so maybe it's a good
alternative to sqwebmail.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: toaster@shupp.org
Sent:
--- Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 10:43 PM, Mark wrote:
Hello,
Kindly let me know if it is possible to integrate
blackberry with the toaster and if yes how to do
it.
Please treat as urgent.
The toaster works with any IMAP/POP client.
Thank you for the
Dear all,
I am trying to setup the toaster using CentOS 5.
However when I reach to the compilation of qmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] netqmail-1.05]# make setup check
nroff -man qmail-qread.8 qmail-qread.0
/bin/sh: nroff: command not found
make: *** [qmail-qread.0] Error 127
please advice.
regards
11 matches
Mail list logo
