Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Alexey Amerik
Problem fixed! The problem was related to severely crippled downstream because of a switch misconfiguration that resulted in packet collisions, and very poor performance. it is my guess that simscan simply gave up waiting on downloading of messages with fairly large attachments . Thank

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: Problem fixed! The problem was related to severely crippled downstream because of a switch misconfiguration that resulted in packet collisions, and very poor performance. it is my guess that simscan simply gave up waiting on downloading of messages with fairly large

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 6, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: If they are still there, then it's pretty likely that the messages were retried anyway. Perhaps someone will have a method for getting them into the queue. But if I were you, I'd just archive it, and remove it from /var/qmail/simscan. If the

RE: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-05 Thread Bill D'Anjou
Message- From: Alexey Amerik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:52 PM To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan It does not appear that the message makes it to clamd or spamd. On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Alexey Amerik wrote: 2007-04-04 18

RE: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-05 Thread Abel Lucano
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Bill D'Anjou wrote: For me, the problem seemed to arise when we were under a spam attack. It appears as though simscan could not keep up under the load (or is spamassassin the problem?). Are there faster, more robust alternatives to consider? Maybe not directly related

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-05 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:34 PM, Bill D'Anjou wrote: For me, the problem seemed to arise when we were under a spam attack. It appears as though simscan could not keep up under the load (or is spamassassin the problem?). Are there faster, more robust alternatives to consider? FYI, I am running

[toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Hello all, Some important messages are getting stuck in /var/qmail/simscan. Currently the dir is totalling 14 megabytes. I am scratching my head here as there is nothing thats obviously wrong. Can someone, anyone, please assist? I've been at it for a week almost. thanks, Alexey

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
At any given time while things are turned on this is what I see for spamd in process list..can someone confirm if this is correct: root 4489 2.9 1.9 33576 31064 ? S16:32 0:05 /usr/ bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -D -x -u vpopmail -s stderr vpopmail 4525 22.2 3.2 53724

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Yes, it is working according to the message headers: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.tournament1.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 But it doesnt like attachments!? On Apr

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
simscan queue does back up, and spamd begins to max out the cpu. On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: Alexey Amerik wrote: Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489]

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: Yes, it is working according to the message headers: *X-Spam-Checker-Version: * SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.tournament1.com *X-Spam-Level:** * *X-Spam-Status: * No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 But it doesnt like

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Rick Macdougall
Alexey Amerik wrote: Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
2007-04-04 18:26:44.830410500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.227 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-04-04 18:26:45.087796500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.227 rcpt

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
It does not appear that the message makes it to clamd or spamd. On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Alexey Amerik wrote: 2007-04-04 18:26:44.830410500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.227 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-04-04