The patch seems valid and the pmsg was passed for this
purpose in previous release of J-T-C but some folks
(didn't remember who) make modifications in mod_jk
part of code and the update was lost.
Seems ok, you could commit :)
This patch fix a real problem and should be also
propagated to
there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's
the status of
loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
there won't be
any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
State of the art is that today only mod_jk could
As I tested, Tomcat 3.3 runs much faster than 3.2.3
(for both JSP and Servlet requests). What changes are
the main factors of this performance improvement? Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5438.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5364.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Try to update your libtool.
I use the following:
+++
jfclere@vtxclere:~ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.3.5 (1.385.2.206 2000/05/27 11:12:27)
+++
Cavan Morris wrote:
I am unable to build mod_webapp.so for apache 2.0.28 on my redhat 7.2
system.
Here's what I've been doing.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3509.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4930.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4139.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5379.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If the trafic becomes too big, we should definitely separate them, but
what is big remain open ( tomcat-users is huge, I just can't read it
without headaches - that's where a split will be most needed )
Exact, we'll have to split at some time just to be able to
see if the question is related to
seguin 01/12/17 07:29:38
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
actually send post data beyond the first ~8K to the servlet container.
if a client request contains post data, the first chunk of it is sent to the
container directly after the forward request is sent.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The patch seems valid and the pmsg was passed for this
purpose in previous release of J-T-C but some folks
(didn't remember who) make modifications in mod_jk
part of code and the update was lost.
Seems ok, you could commit :)
done.
This patch fix a real problem and should be also
- Original Message -
From: Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing
| When my work is done, Session Affinity will not be required in order to
|
there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's
the status of
loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
there won't be
any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
State of the art is that today only
Hey Guys,
My name is Will I've been trying to do Transfer-Encoding: chunked on my
request to Tomcat 4.0.1, with no success I've tried using the Apache Commons
jar, a HttpClient library that said it had chunked encoding on requests, and
my own implementation. I've look through the Catalina
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote:
Tomcat 4.0.x support ajp13 protocol, used in mod_jk
but still miss a subtil feature (jvmroute) to be
able to keep the route to the good JVM in
session mode (SessionAfinity).
how does the connector set/use jvmroute? i assume there is some sort
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
couldn't the connector be solely
responsible for
this? the connector could add a cookie to the response, then read this
cookie on subsequent requests, and then you wouldn't have to
add stuff to
servlet containers to handle this. or, i could be
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:25:17 -0600
From: Kevin Seguin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing
Tom,
Will the repository be a single point of failure then ?
Oliver
AXA eSolutions GmbH
AXA Konzern AG Germany
Oliver Lauer
Web Architect
Wörthstraße 34
D-50668 Köln
Germany
Tel.: +49 221 148 31277
Fax: +49 221 148 43963
Mobil: +49 179 59 064 59
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patrickl01/12/17 09:34:05
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources_en.properties
ApplicationResources_es.properties
SetUpServerAction.java SetUpServiceAction.java
Log:
patrickl01/12/17 09:37:43
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
SetUpServerAction.java
Log:
Replace tabs with proper number of spaces to conform to coding style standard
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +27 -27
Oliver:
No, there is no single point of failure. The way it works is thus:
Each tomcat instance in a cluster (defined by a single multicast
address/port):
- Shall keep a copy of all sessions that it owns (created).
- May be configured to be a session repository (or not).
Session
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
Keep in mind that with distributed sessions (coming soon to a tomcat
near you), affinity is no longer 'required' in order to function. This
provides the added benefit of fail-over.
As I mentioned in a thread about this on TOMCAT-USER, there *are*
remm01/12/17 12:21:12
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves
ErrorReportValve.java
Log:
- Fix a problem where an exception report thrown from a servlet or a JSP would
not get properly displayed. The bug was caused because sendError
remm01/12/17 12:41:00
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves Tag:
tomcat_40_branch ErrorReportValve.java
Log:
- Fix a problem where an exception report thrown from a servlet or a JSP would
not get properly displayed. The bug was
I am trying to set up a project which uses servlets and thought I was doing fine until
it came time to access the server
via port 8180. All the emails refer to 8080, but it looks to me like the default port
for non-secure HTTP
communications comes as 8180 in web.xml.
Anyway...
I have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5471.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
patrickl01/12/17 18:50:30
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java
Log:
Implement a better fix for the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in main
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +5 -9
craigmcc01/12/17 20:17:32
Modified:webapps/admin tree-control-test.jsp
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF controls.tld
Removed: webapps/admin/WEB-INF tree-control.tld
Log:
Change the name of the application-specific tag library to controls so
that we can add some
41 matches
Mail list logo
