RE: Jk2: scoreboard format and semantics.

2002-04-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
- Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..

2002-04-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8363] New: - Out of memory error

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8363. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: MinTC, terrible rudeness, persistence

2002-04-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: This cannot be done, as the layering structure of the ASF won't allow it. It can be hosted either in commons, either here (but then it would be swallowed by the TC project itself), or as a top level project of Jakarta (or some other project)... couldn't it be a tomcat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8363] - Out of memory error

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8363. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8339] - Request.getInputStream() has no data

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8323] - No support for running the 64 bit JVM

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8323. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8318] - class not found for: org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8235] - message.properties is missing in package Tyrex-0.9.7.0.jar

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8235. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Bad build process for mod_webapp for Apache 2

2002-04-22 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
(sorry if this has come through already, but I did not see the post on the mail archive, so I done went and subscribed to the list to resend it) For those of you who do not regularly cruise the tomcat-user postings (you all do that regularly, right? ;-), a number of us in the user community

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7640] - JDBC connection and transaction related

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7640. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt

2002-04-22 Thread remm
remm02/04/22 08:12:23 Added: .RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt Log: - Major features have been added to Tomcat since 4.0.x (list of the major features is included in the document), and as all (but one) is now feature complete, I think it is time to start a new release

[COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1 release plan draft posted

2002-04-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
I have committed a draft of a release plan for the next major release of Tomcat 4.x (proposed version number: 4.1). All the major features currently in development in HEAD, j-t-c, j-t-j are either feature complete, or reasonably close from being feature complete, and should all contribute to

Daemon Thread Problem in J-T-C

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
With the latest and greated J-T-C code, the HEAD branch of Tomcat 4 doesn't shut down cleanly. Usually, this implies that somebody forgot to mark their threads as daemon threads (or otherwise clean them up at shutdown time). Indeed, a thread dump after the shutdown command is executed shows a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8339] - Request.getInputStream() has no data

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8339] - Request.getInputStream() has no data

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8339] - Request.getInputStream() has no data

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin TomcatTreeBuilder.java

2002-04-22 Thread manveen
manveen 02/04/22 11:53:51 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin TomcatTreeBuilder.java Log: Do not show fully blown tree at tool startup. Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +7 -7

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Reaper.java ThreadPool.java

2002-04-22 Thread costin
costin 02/04/22 11:55:56 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Reaper.java ThreadPool.java Log: Make the ThreadPool threads 'daemon'. Make the Reaper non-deamon. In 3.x there is no thread waiting for the shutdown, so we need at least

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java JkMain.java

2002-04-22 Thread costin
costin 02/04/22 12:03:34 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java JkMain.java Log: Fix the shutdown for jk2. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/JkCoyoteHandler.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java ContextConfig.java

2002-04-22 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc02/04/22 12:04:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java ContextConfig.java Log: When parsing server.xml and web.xml files, use an InputSource rather than an InputStream so that we can set a system identifier. Among

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8024] - Can't include entities in web.xml

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8024. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8318] - class not found for: org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8318] - class not found for: org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java

2002-04-22 Thread remm
remm02/04/22 13:19:02 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java Log: - Fix the fix for the shutdown. - Costin: if the fix is not good, feel free to revert or fix it. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +3 -0

Re: Daemon Thread Problem in J-T-C

2002-04-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
With the latest and greated J-T-C code, the HEAD branch of Tomcat 4 doesn't shut down cleanly. Usually, this implies that somebody forgot to mark their threads as daemon threads (or otherwise clean them up at shutdown time). Indeed, a thread dump after the shutdown command is executed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6990] - Catalina 4.0.2 hangs after a few days

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6990. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev web.xml.txt

2002-04-22 Thread remm
remm02/04/22 13:31:16 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev web.xml.txt Log: - XML was not well formed. - Patch submitted by Andy Warburton andy2602 at lycos.co.uk Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/web.xml.txt

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev web.xml.txt

2002-04-22 Thread remm
remm02/04/22 13:31:57 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev Tag: tomcat_40_branch web.xml.txt Log: - XML was not well formed (bug 8344). - Patch submitted by Andy Warburton andy2602 at lycos.co.uk Revision ChangesPath No revision No

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8344] - Badly formed XML doc

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8344. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs realm-howto.xml

2002-04-22 Thread remm
remm02/04/22 13:45:52 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs Tag: tomcat_40_branch realm-howto.xml Log: - Fix JDBC URL (bug 7580). - Patch submitted by Konrad JagodziƱski konrad at hansin.com.pl Revision ChangesPath No revision No

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7580] - Wrong URL for jdbc connection

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7580. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6908] - JavaCompiler interface setOutputDir always called with null parameter

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6908. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7558] - ClassLoader can't find classes in new created jar from zip

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7558. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

patch to jk_uri_worker_map.c

2002-04-22 Thread Aravind Gottipati
Hi, I was looking at jk_uri_worker_map.c because my context url maps were not working like expected. I also saw a bunch of posts on the web about this problem. I looked at the source code and I am submitting a patch to this in a different mail. Basically, I am just extracting the sub

[PATCH] to jk_uri_worker_map.c (fix url matching for context matches)

2002-04-22 Thread Aravind Gottipati
Index: jk_uri_worker_map.c === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 jk_uri_worker_map.c --- jk_uri_worker_map.c 7 Dec 2001 00:57:16 -

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/doc mod_jk-howto.html

2002-04-22 Thread costinm
Hi Glenn, Could you update at least the apache2 connector ? This features makes sense on all servers actually ( i.e. IIS, etc ) - but we should have it at least in 1.3 and 2.0. Also, any chance to update this on native2 ? I'll do it later if you don't have the time. Costin On 21 Apr

[PATCH] org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpRequestHandler.java

2002-04-22 Thread Cavan Morris
Could someone please tell me what I need to do to get the attached patch committed? It fixes a NullPointerException thrown when the Warp Connector is used with a user-data-constraint. I got the original file from the archive located here

Re: [PATCH] possible speed enhancement to JspServlet.java

2002-04-22 Thread Kin-Man Chung
Duncan, I looked at your patch carefully, looks like Remy's work on jasper2 already addressed the issues that you are trying to solved. In fact, Remy only creates a compiler for the container, whereas you would have created a compiler for each jsp page. OTOH, you save the modification date for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8390] New: - debug logging is always on

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8390. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8356] - Can't remove this package using rpm version 4.0.3

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8392] New: - Removal of

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8392. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8393] New: - Removal of WEB-INF from jk connector not noted in parent build.xml

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8393. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8392] - Removal of

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8392. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8393] - Removal of WEB-INF from jk connector not noted in parent build.xml

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8393. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1 release plan draft posted

2002-04-22 Thread Punky Tse
Rempy, * New Coyote HTTP/1.1 connector Do you plan to replace the old HTTP connector and set it as default? +1 for this. Comments ? Remy Punky _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To

Re: [COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1 release plan draft posted

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Punky Tse wrote: Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:08:40 +0800 From: Punky Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], Punky Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [COMMENTS] Tomcat 4.1 release plan

Tomcat in industry

2002-04-22 Thread Paul Wallace
Hello, I don't know where I heard it, or if indeed I heard it all, but can someone clarify if Tomcat can be used in industrial strength web applications? That is, is it able to handle for example, traffic of 100 hits p/s? Must it be integrated with the Apache web server to make it so? Where

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/doc mod_jk-howto.html

2002-04-22 Thread costinm
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Hmmm, this gives me an incentive to play around with Apache 2.0. It's a nice server :-) What would help the most is a 'common' implementation - i.e. have as much as possible independent of the server. Also, any chance to update this on native2 ?

Why is JDK needed to install Apache Tomcat 4.0 on WinNT?

2002-04-22 Thread Kiran Kumar N (RBIN/DCA-NMS)
I am trying to create a setup an application of mine for distribution among my associates. But during the installation of Tomcat 4.0, it initially checks if JDK is installed and if not, it exits the installation. Why does it need the JDK? All my target PCs have JREs installed. What should be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8399] New: - Nightly Build from 04/22/2002 does not shutdown

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla
: Normal Priority: Other Component: Catalina AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I started tomcat with startup.bat (jakarta-tomcat-4.0-20020422.zip), everything runs fine but when i run shutdown.bat this doesnt work, i was running tomcat alone

PATCH: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/ApplicationResources_es.properties

2002-04-22 Thread Adrian Almenar
Its not all done but now its a lot betterthan before. Cheers, Adrian Almenar ApplicationResources_es.properties.patch Description: Binary data -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Why is JDK needed to install Apache Tomcat 4.0 on WinNT?

2002-04-22 Thread Bojan Smojver
Maybe because TC compiles JSP's into classes and it needs javac for that, which is probably not part of the JRE. Bojan Quoting Kiran Kumar N (RBIN/DCA-NMS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am trying to create a setup an application of mine for distribution among my associates. But during the

Re: Tomcat in industry

2002-04-22 Thread Bojan Smojver
It is easy to find out. Install it on your target system, put your applications in it (i.e. JSP's, Velocity pages, servlets or whatever else you use) and run 'ab' (from Apache) on it. It will come back with the number of pages served per second. Do the above for a few days and you'll find out if