Jeff Trawick wrote:
This fixes mod_jk segfaults when gcc is used to build mod_jk with gcc on
AIX. Currently, the -brtl ld flag is missing. Linking with apxs takes
care of that and, in general, can clear up other differences.
According to the comment, apxs wasn't used because it compiles all
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Argh, that config option didn't get tested with the mod_dir/mod_alias
change.
Happy to help ;-)
With that bug fix, and the others recently submitted it looks like we
will
need to do another mod_jk 1.2 release in the next month.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i.e ecs, tomcat-4.1.24,
Any example?
On ftp.task.gda.pl and on sunsite.icm.edu.pl I'm not able to find rpm files
for
ecs and tomcat-4.1.24.
As
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-06-19/jakarta-tomcat-5.html
Buildfile: build.xml
prepare-release:
[mkdir] Created dir:
hi,
is there any design doc for tomcat and jtc. even one or two pages in
text will do. i just wanted to have a feel of the system.
i have gone through the source didn't have the confidence to tweak it
for my custom needs. and can somebody also tell me what part of the code
is not necessary
jean-frederic clere wrote:
That needs a little more, because the *.lo files are in common are build
before using LIBTOOL instead apxs.
When using the actual make in apache-2.0 the common/*.c are compiled and
left in apache-2.0 but apxs looks for the *.lo in common: (that is with
2.0.40)
+++
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20907.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
That needs a little more, because the *.lo files are in common are
build before using LIBTOOL instead apxs.
When using the actual make in apache-2.0 the common/*.c are compiled
and left in apache-2.0 but apxs looks for the *.lo in common: (that
funkman 2003/06/19 05:23:47
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
DefaultServlet.java
Log:
Cleanup for xslt and readme functionality
- make readme retrieval its own method
- getting xsltInputStream its own method
- use Resource for
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
That needs a little more, because the *.lo files are in common are
build before using LIBTOOL instead apxs.
When using the actual make in apache-2.0 the common/*.c are compiled
and left in apache-2.0 but apxs looks for the *.lo in common: (that
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
That needs a little more, because the *.lo files are in common are
build before using LIBTOOL instead apxs.
When using the actual make in apache-2.0 the common/*.c are compiled
and left in apache-2.0 but apxs looks for the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20907.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
gmake in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native builds correctly.
It fails only if apxs -q LIBTOOLS does not work and Apache-2.0
libtools is incompatible with the system one.
btw... when does apxs -q LIBTOOL not work? apache 2.0.40?
or maybe there is some path-related
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
gmake in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native builds correctly.
It fails only if apxs -q LIBTOOLS does not work and Apache-2.0
libtools is incompatible with the system one.
btw... when does apxs -q LIBTOOL not work? apache 2.0.40?
When you have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20919.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20483.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20919.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2003/06/19 14:06:31
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
messages.properties
Log:
- Fix 20894: body-content value of JSP should be error if SimpleTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20894.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
funkman 2003/06/19 14:37:15
Modified:webapps/docs proxy-howto.xml
Log:
Remove mod_webapp references
Fix links to Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector
Add quick blurb about apache 2
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +9 -7 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/proxy-howto.xml
funkman 2003/06/19 14:42:43
Modified:webapps/docs tomcat-docs.xsl
Log:
Update copyright year
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/tomcat-docs.xsl
Index: tomcat-docs.xsl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20821.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Have a look at my How Tomcat Works :), downloadable from www.brainysoftware.com.
Rgds,
budi
---Original Message---
From: Nishant Kumar
Subject: tomcat design doc
Sent: 19 Jun 2003 10:18:37
hi,
is there any design doc for tomcat and jtc. even one or two
Since the PDF is in a database and being served by a servlet, it is the
responsibility of the servlet to read the byte range headers and return the
correct content.
The DefaultServlet will also serve parts of a file if the file is a physical
file. (I think it works fine for war files too) If
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ok, yes I know that this should go to commons-dev, but I don't monitor that
list as closely and all of the active developers hang-out here.
I would like to make some changes to native/unix/native, and (keeping with
commons conventions) should ask first. I already have commons-sandbox
karma, so
Bill Barker wrote:
Ok, yes I know that this should go to commons-dev, but I don't monitor
that list as closely and all of the active developers hang-out here.
I would like to make some changes to native/unix/native, and (keeping with
commons conventions) should ask first. I already have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20935.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello.
I have a quick question about support for WEBDAV in Tomcat and the AJP13
connector.
We use Tomcat and Apache in a reverse-proxy product that we have
developed. When we employ this reverse proxy against Microsoft's Outlook
Web Access client and Exchange 2000 server that implements
36 matches
Mail list logo
