Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
James Duncan Davidson wrote: > On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so > >> hopefully we will be much closer to the

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-21 Thread Dave Oxley
ave. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:13:45 -0800 > >On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-20 Thread James Duncan Davidson
On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so >> hopefully we will be much closer to the "reality" end of the scale soon. >> > Wh

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-20 Thread Arshad Mahmood
' and Java programmer. Regards, Arshad - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 8:21 PM Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache > Nick Bauman wrote: > > > Craig, > > >

RE: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
to a chimpanzee." -- Ted Ts'o >-Original Message- >From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 11:03 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache > > >on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" &

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Jon Stevens
on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so > hopefully we will be > much closer to the "reality" end of the scale soon. Why isn't development happening in public? Having local CVS tree does not e

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Nick Bauman wrote: > Craig, > > These design goals are AWESOME. It makes much more sense to do this > way. However, I _did_ do this as you mentioned: I have *.jsp and *.j > mapped to specific servlets in my ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml and all I got was > the output of index.jsp as something Netscape had

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Nick Bauman
Craig, These design goals are AWESOME. It makes much more sense to do this way. However, I _did_ do this as you mentioned: I have *.jsp and *.j mapped to specific servlets in my ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml and all I got was the output of index.jsp as something Netscape had to download. telnetting to the

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Nick Bauman wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > Nick Bauman wrote: > > > > > Uhhh, I just realized something > > > > > > With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine > > > with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can som

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Nick Bauman
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Nick Bauman wrote: > > > Uhhh, I just realized something > > > > With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine > > with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone > > enlighten me? > > > > Th

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Nick Bauman wrote: > Uhhh, I just realized something > > With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine > with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone > enlighten me? > The design goals for mod_webapp say that it should respect web.xml mapp

Re: Catalina + Apache

2001-01-18 Thread Nick Bauman
Uhhh, I just realized something With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone enlighten me? On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Nick Bauman wrote: > Hello Jakarta Tribe, > > We are targeting Tomcat 4.0 for a