James Duncan Davidson wrote:
> On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so
> >> hopefully we will be much closer to the
ave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache
>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:13:45 -0800
>
>On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTE
On 1/19/01 2:03 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so
>> hopefully we will be much closer to the "reality" end of the scale soon.
>>
> Wh
'
and Java programmer.
Regards,
Arshad
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache
> Nick Bauman wrote:
>
> > Craig,
> >
>
to a chimpanzee."
-- Ted Ts'o
>-Original Message-
>From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 11:03 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Catalina + Apache
>
>
>on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan"
&
on 1/19/01 12:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know Pier has a bunch of bugfixes currently in his local CVS tree, so
> hopefully we will be
> much closer to the "reality" end of the scale soon.
Why isn't development happening in public? Having local CVS tree does not
e
Nick Bauman wrote:
> Craig,
>
> These design goals are AWESOME. It makes much more sense to do this
> way. However, I _did_ do this as you mentioned: I have *.jsp and *.j
> mapped to specific servlets in my ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml and all I got was
> the output of index.jsp as something Netscape had
Craig,
These design goals are AWESOME. It makes much more sense to do this
way. However, I _did_ do this as you mentioned: I have *.jsp and *.j
mapped to specific servlets in my ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml and all I got was
the output of index.jsp as something Netscape had to download. telnetting
to the
Nick Bauman wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> > Nick Bauman wrote:
> >
> > > Uhhh, I just realized something
> > >
> > > With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine
> > > with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can som
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Nick Bauman wrote:
>
> > Uhhh, I just realized something
> >
> > With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine
> > with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone
> > enlighten me?
> >
>
> Th
Nick Bauman wrote:
> Uhhh, I just realized something
>
> With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine
> with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone
> enlighten me?
>
The design goals for mod_webapp say that it should respect web.xml mapp
Uhhh, I just realized something
With TC 3x, you could map an extension from Apache to the servlet engine
with an AddHandler directive. I see nothing like this for TC4. Can someone
enlighten me?
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Nick Bauman wrote:
> Hello Jakarta Tribe,
>
> We are targeting Tomcat 4.0 for a
12 matches
Mail list logo