Jason Brittain wrote:
On 7/23/05, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been doing some quick tests and my totally unscientific,
statistically invalid results are that cvs annotate seems to be about 7
to 8 times faster than svn blame (50s compared with 7s) and cvs log
seems to be about 2
--- Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I have looked a little at the command line tool now. It's actually more
like the regular svn log. It looks like the thing missing is good UI
support.
Have you tried TortoiseSVN for Windows, and the SVN Plugin for Eclipse ? I use
both
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's not really a UI thing for me. One feature I use often are revision
lists for a particular file, to be able to tell where a bug has been
introduced (I then do diffs between revisions). It seems with SVN I have
to retrieve the full revision list for the repository
Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 3:14 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: New tag ?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's not really a UI thing
On 7/23/05, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been doing some quick tests and my totally unscientific,
statistically invalid results are that cvs annotate seems to be about 7
to 8 times faster than svn blame (50s compared with 7s) and cvs log
seems to be about 2 to 3 times faster
Hey Remy,
I talk with Stefan Bodwig at ApacheCon about the revision problem.
He has implement a small antlib project and hope this help
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/
I have not test it yet, but it seams that we can use this ...
==
I can help to migrate to svn
Yes,
I also think we can build a 5.5.10 release with all the new stuff. The
new cluster redesign version is yet only tested under small
load. Better I commit my new jkstatus task after my three week holiday
for next release (5.5.11).
I have add a new lib (catalina-jmx-ant.jar) for jmx ant
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Yes,
I also think we can build a 5.5.10 release with all the new stuff. The
new cluster redesign version is yet only tested under small
load. Better I commit my new jkstatus task after my three week holiday
for next release (5.5.11).
Sounds good.
I have add a new lib
Hi,
I'm OK with cutting 5.5.10 tomorrow or Saturday. If that's too early, let's
pick a different time.
After 5.5.10, I want to talk about SVN migration again ;) I'm aware of the
lack of satisfaction among the CVS GUI users, but infra is cutting off CVS
on January 1st, and for me personally,
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I'm OK with cutting 5.5.10 tomorrow or Saturday. If that's too early, let's
pick a different time.
I don't have further code changes to add in this build, it seems.
After 5.5.10, I want to talk about SVN migration again ;) I'm aware of the
lack of satisfaction among
Subject: Re: New tag ?
AM
Please respond
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I'm OK with cutting 5.5.10 tomorrow or Saturday. If that's too
early, let's
pick a different time.
I don't have further code changes to add in this build, it seems.
After 5.5.10, I want to talk about SVN migration again ;) I'm aware
of
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:42 AM
Subject: New tag ?
Hi,
I think the APR capabilities that we added are now sufficiently stable
to warrant testing. If the other
Bill Barker wrote:
Hi,
I think the APR capabilities that we added are now sufficiently stable
to warrant testing. If the other areas that saw changes recently
(clustering, JK) are ok too, then it could be a good idea to release a
new build.
JK should be fine. I've been pretty careful with
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: New tag ?
Bill Barker wrote:
Hi,
I think the APR capabilities that we added are now sufficiently stable
to warrant
15 matches
Mail list logo
