Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open
and could be fixed quickly ...
And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well
i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on,
they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to
the AJP13
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open
and could be fixed quickly ...
And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well
i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on,
they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to
: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open
and could be fixed quickly ...
And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well
i_r.dll works
5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL
;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ??
Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ?
I have retested it with TC4.
Could you give me more details about how you get :
cipher_suite:
key_size:
ssl_session:
BTW, I
We have a serious problem with jk and apache2.
Try running:
ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp
I have 59
[Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler
jakarta-servlet not found for: date.jsp
Now, IMHO there is problem with map_uri_to_worker,
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
We have a serious problem with jk and apache2.
Try running:
ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp
I have 59
[Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler
jakarta-servlet not found for: date.jsp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:26
To: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: GOMEZ Henri
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
I'm not sure I understand how request_rec gets recycled while
we
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:39
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Cc: 'GOMEZ Henri'
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
Can't believe it!
We have a race condition beetwen the:
Alias /examples /tomcat/webapps/examples
and
JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
If I comment out the Alias directive there is no more colision, and if I
slow down the map_uri_to_worker putting the
De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 15 de junio de 2002 5:50
In TC33, there are for i_rdr:
8297 Blo inetinfo.exe error ; Also no resource found (error 404)
5411 NorJSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3
Thanks Bill, lost them, marked as INVALID
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0
(after all I asked for this release)
I'll check all open bugs in bugzilla and sort what
are revelants to jk 1.2.0 and what to 2.0.0.
Since mod_jk (and jtc) are now revelants to both
tomcat3/tomcat4, what about creating a jtc entry
in bugzilla to have
There are several bugs related to auth, I'll take a look.
We must have all the bugs evaluated ( even with LATER ) before
a formal release.
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0
(after all I asked for this release)
Great, thanks for volunteering !
( we should also start looking for a
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0
(after all I asked for this release)
;) Thanks for volunteering !!!
I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :)..
And i doubt that they
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0
(after all I asked for this release)
I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :)..
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:06 PM
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57
OK
1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my
systems for a really long time
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 16:11
Did there is still opened bugs in mod_jk 1.2.0 (jtc/native)
which could prevent us to make a release ?
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang
tomcat AFAIK.
we need some time to
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3
test hang tomcat AFAIK.
Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ?
we need some time to test jk 1.2 under IIS..
You're the boss here ;)
AFAIK there is some problems with file names, the given reg
file, docs and binaries has different names
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3
test hang tomcat AFAIK.
Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ?
Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the
jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with
modjk1.1
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3
test hang tomcat AFAIK.
Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ?
Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the
jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with
modjk1.1 should not upgrade ).
This affects only
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If
someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release,
and if this is listed I'll fix it.
Hum, what's should do the release manager ?
Build the 'official' release, review the
Hum, what's should do the release manager ?
Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what
bugs must be
fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements.
May be we could team-up with Larry ?
And of course, make sure the stars are in the right position and
all
, June 12, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Hum, what's should do the release manager ?
Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what
bugs must be
fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 18:46
Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the
jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with
modjk1.1 should not upgrade ).
OK, i was only pointing to some problem i know
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If
someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release,
and if this is listed I'll fix it.
The silence can be masked :)
Could we do some kind of collective RM for that
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 22:01
No, we need a benevolent worker :-)
Just realized i was falling in my habitual naiveness.. :)
The tasklist of the RM starts with collect open bugs, ok?
We have the bugs reported by the query below in
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my
systems for a really long time now.
Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used
with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows?
To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35
and
Yes it could be a good idea because I can't have access to the CVS repository to
generate a newer release of mod_jk under AIX 4.3.3.
Thx
-Message d'origine-
De: GOMEZ Henri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: lundi 10 juin 2002 15:26
A: Tomcat Developers List
Objet: jk 1.2
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ?
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot,
and ask
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ?
If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot,
and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there
platforms.
+1 !
The recent bug report about 'deadlock' turned out
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
And jk1.0 = tomcat3.2/mod_jk.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
And jk1.0 =
I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again
with more tests.
I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a
Fujitsu compiler,
Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug).
+++
error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init()
uri:/jkstatus/* host
=(null)
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again
with more tests.
I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a
Fujitsu compiler,
Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug).
+++
error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init()
uri:/jkstatus/* host
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my
systems for a really long time now.
Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used
with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows?
To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 and
36 matches
Mail list logo
