DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2004/02/25 22:00:29
Will it be in rc2 ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:50 AM
Subject: TC 3.3.2 and JMX
Any objection to set the default JMX port to -1 ?
None here. Jk-Coyote is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
here is the document.
attachment: msg.zip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to get this patch into CVS in order to use PCRE on NetWare where only the
ap_ prefixed pcre functions are exported. I have tested that the patch below compiles
fine with NetWare, Linux and Win32.
As a positive side effect on Win32 the binary is about 24
Hi Henri,
+#include httpd.h
httpd.h may not be found for IIS or Netscape, so it will brake these.
Ditto for others.
yep - found this already; please see my second patch which shouldnt break any other
platforms.
BTW while testing with this I found that on Linux when compiled with APXS also no
Thanks Dave,
This seemed to be an issue with tomcat 4.1.24.
Using 4.1.29 resolves this issue.
Thanks for the pointers, especially the one to open my eyes and check which
tomcat version I was using.
Feel a bit of a muppet!
Greg
-Original Message-
From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Henri,
+#include httpd.h
httpd.h may not be found for IIS or Netscape, so it will brake these.
Ditto for others.
yep - found this already; please see my second patch which shouldnt break any other platforms.
ok
BTW while testing with this I found that on Linux when
Hi All,
We have been giving the latest CVS code for mod_jk2 a thorough test to look
towards using it as our next production release.
Happy to say that thus far it seems fine.
The following still looks like a bug to me so I have attached a diff (not
huge) of
Sorry, this seems to be a bad week.
The diff should be:
$ diff jk_shm.c.org jk_shm.c
201c201
shm-fname, finfo.size, rc, globalShmPool, error );
---
shm-fname, (int) finfo.size, rc, (int)
globalShmPool, error );
Greg
-Original Message-
Hi,
Sorry, this seems to be a bad week.
The diff should be:
$ diff jk_shm.c.org jk_shm.c
can you please use unified diffs:
diff -u jk_shm.c.org jk_shm.c
this is the preferred patch form with all ASF stuff...
Guenter.
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18449.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Kurt,
I've reviewed your patch and have some comments included inline below.
regcomp and ap_pregcomp are not interchangeable like this. ap_pregcomp
needs an apr_pool to be passed to it and it returns the regex_t. I
think (apr_pool_t *)uriEnv-pool-_private is correct here (Henri?,
Henri,
BTW while testing with this I found that on Linux when compiled with APXS
also no PCRE is used...
What do you means ?
just to confirm this quickly I just inserted a line 'xxx' inside the HAS_PCRE in
jk_uriEnv.c and compilation went trough without error, while if I add '-DHAS_PCRE'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the ap_hook_translate_name from APR_HOOK_FIRST to
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE and I've get the ErrorDocument.
jk use also APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for ap_hook_translate_name, so I wonder
why it's set to APR_HOOK_FIRST in jk2
Henri Gomez wrote:
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the ap_hook_translate_name from APR_HOOK_FIRST to
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE and I've get the ErrorDocument.
jk use also APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for ap_hook_translate_name, so I wonder
why it's set to
Hi,
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the ap_hook_translate_name from APR_HOOK_FIRST to
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE and I've get the ErrorDocument.
jk use also APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for ap_hook_translate_name, so I wonder
why it's set to
Hi,
I'm unsubscribing you so we don't get these automatic responses.
Thanks,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:29 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Steven
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27253.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
thats wrong
attachment: friend.zip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/02/26 07:26:13
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteConnector.java LocalStrings.properties
Log:
- Add missing properties. Display the root cause if something bad happens, and
don't rethrow the exception.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
looks like this was already done by Mladen with mod_jk2 version 1.42, but two days
later the patch was reverted again with 1.43 by BoJan...
Guenter.
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the ap_hook_translate_name
Henri Gomez wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
looks like this was already done by Mladen with mod_jk2 version 1.42,
but two days later the patch was reverted again with 1.43 by BoJan...
Guenter.
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the
Thanks,
Unfortunately my OS is Gentoo and after installing there ebuild (basically
equivalent to an RPM) directories are all over the place. The base location
of apache is actually /etc/apache2 but when I try using this as a configure
option I get this message:
building connector for
Hi to all,
while playing with jk2, I discovered many things I didn't like :
* If no worker or group is defined for an uri, it goes to lb:lb.
The default worker SHOULD BE configurable, I'll modify this.
* Stupid question, but how could I use a normal ajp13 socket, not a
group in uri defs ?
jfarcand2004/02/26 09:21:32
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
LocalStrings_fr.properties
Log:
Fix minor typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3
Are you using the current source from CVS or
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ yet?
libtool is set correctly for you in the current version. Simply
configure with --with-apxs2 with current source and it should be
correctly set for you.
From: Al Banard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
funkman 2004/02/26 09:30:01
Modified:xdocs-faq tomcatuser.xml
docs/faq/printer tomcatuser.html
docs/faq tomcatuser.html
Log:
Change wording for the links to good etiquette. The good etiquette
links were non-tomcat related but users were still emailing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteInterceptor2.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I never look at these emails I get because I fear they are spoofs. Are
they? This was an email that said it came from the list via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and had an attached file called friend.zip. Is this a
trojan horse?
At 07:02 AM 2/26/2004, you wrote:
thats wrong
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Michael,
I never look at these emails I get because I fear they are spoofs. Are
thats best you can do - delete then immediatly.
they? This was an email that said it came from the list via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and had an attached file called friend.zip. Is this a
trojan horse?
its one of
Hi,
I'm unsubscribing you so we don't get these automatic responses.
thanks
is it possible to filter some more from the subject?
f.e. recent worms with 're:hi' and 're:unknown' etc.? and perhaps 'autoresponder' too?
that would help a lot I believe
Guenter.
Hi Guenter,
Just a tweak or two and its ready. The preg calloc only applies to the
HAS_PCRE case and PREGCOMP isn't needed. Otherwise it looks good. I'll
test and commit it tomorrow.
-Kurt
From: Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Kurt,
I've reviewed your patch and have some comments included
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14885.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15172.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27273.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/02/26 17:03:56
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TldLocationsCache.java JspConfig.java
Log:
Close input stream
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +47 -37
luehe 2004/02/26 17:30:39
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TldLocationsCache.java
Log:
80 char limit
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +3 -2
Hi,
patch to be a bit more verbose than showing a blank page when no scoreboard
available...
Guenter.
--- jk_worker_status.c.orig Tue Feb 24 12:30:10 2004
+++ jk_worker_status.c Fri Feb 27 03:43:30 2004
@@ -173,6
Hi Kurt,
Just a tweak or two and its ready. The preg calloc only applies to the
HAS_PCRE case and PREGCOMP isn't needed. Otherwise it looks good. I'll
test and commit it tomorrow.
thanks again for reviewing and comments!
Guenter.
http://www.gknw.com/test/pcre_patch4
Hi,
if my last patch for PCRE functions gets accepted,
this patch to the makefile makes usage of the PCRE on NetWare.
Guenter.
http://www.gknw.com/test/NWGNUmakefile.diff
###
---
Hi,
if my last patch for PCRE functions gets accepted,
this patch to the makefile makes usage of the AP_PCRE on Win32.
Guenter.
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.dsp.diff
###
---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/02/26 21:32:58
Modified:src/shell cpappend.bat jspc.bat jspc.sh shutdown.bat
shutdown.sh startup.bat startup.sh tomcat.bat
tomcat.sh tomcatEnv.bat
Log:
Updating to the Apache License v2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/02/26 21:45:47
Modified:src/etc apps-127.0.0.1.xml apps-admin.xml apps-examples.xml
modules.xml server.xml tomcat.policy
src/etc/jk mod_jk.conf mod_jk.conf-jni obj.conf
uriworkermap.properties
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the
request please visit http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration,
billbarker2004/02/26 21:39:34
Modified:src/webpages index.html
src/webpages/WEB-INF web.xml
Log:
Updating to the Apache License v2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +15 -0 jakarta-tomcat/src/webpages/index.html
Index: index.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25234.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Kurt,
Just a tweak or two and its ready. The preg calloc only applies to the
HAS_PCRE case and PREGCOMP isn't needed. Otherwise it looks good. I'll
test and commit it tomorrow.
yep, forgot to remove PREGCOMP.
you mean perhaps so:
{
#ifdef HAS_AP_PCRE
regex_t *preg =
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27273.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seemed to be an issue with tomcat 4.1.24.
Using 4.1.29 resolves this issue.
Thanks for the pointers, especially the one to open my eyes and check
which tomcat version I was using.
While you're at it, you should upgrade to 4.1.30 which fixes some memory
leaks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Kurt,
I've reviewed your patch and have some comments included inline below.
regcomp and ap_pregcomp are not interchangeable like this. ap_pregcomp
needs an apr_pool to be passed to it and it returns the regex_t. I
think (apr_pool_t *)uriEnv-pool-_private is correct here (Henri?,
Hi Guenter,
I've reviewed your patch and have some comments included inline below.
From: Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
the previous patch seems to break non-Apache connectors, so here's
another patch which shouldnt break anything unless you set the
HAVE_AP_PCRE.
I would like to get
hgomez 2004/02/26 08:02:38
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
LocalStrings_fr.properties
Log:
Update the french translation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +18 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
looks like this was already done by Mladen with mod_jk2 version 1.42, but two days
later the patch was reverted again with 1.43 by BoJan...
Guenter.
With the actual code in jk2, we can't use mod_alias, for instance
ErrorDocument.
I changed the ap_hook_translate_name from APR_HOOK_FIRST
i wait for a reply!
attachment: concert.zip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried that, but Solaris (8) diff does not support unified diff's
(according to my Solaris 8 man page), but in the interests of unity:
--- jk_shm.c.org2004-02-23 14:40:01.0 +
+++ jk_shm.c2004-02-26 11:03:38.0 +
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
75 matches
Mail list logo
