DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
NormW wrote:
Good morning All
In Mod_Jk2, jk_UriEnv.c, line 419,
jk_uriEnv.c.
there is is a test to determine which end
of a URL template string has the *, to determine if the 'match type' should
be PREFIX or SUFFIX.
[ if (uri[strlen(uri) - 1] == '*') { ]
A URL template found in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27517.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27527.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/03/09 03:44:04
Modified:jk/conf jk2.manifest
Log:
- Add two JARs for Tomcat 5 (untested).
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/conf/jk2.manifest
Index: jk2.manifest
Hi,
I'm working on a new shmem for JK2 implementation using APR (It took me more
then I've expected :-).
After having few different implementations, here is what I propose:
Use the shared memory (anonymous where applicable) through apr_rmm.
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if
Yoav,
Can you kill this account?
Think that anyone posting to this list during last few days receives the
message stating that this account doesn't exists.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9737.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support.
So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's
implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr.
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY appears bogus on Solaris 2.8 with 0.94 and CVS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support.
So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's
implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr.
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY appears bogus on Solaris 2.8 with 0.94
and CVS (1.0).
First of all why? What is the reason, apr or solaris?
Looks like it is apr.
How can you change the apr build as mod_jk2 builds apr when
trying to make apr for apache 1.3.x? Using Suns complier.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
It is a little strange that noone from the apache team has stepped
forward to clarify that these are fake... since they are being sent
to an apache mailing list after all.
That depends on how you define stepped forward. We've identified
these as fake/virus emails early on. There was never
to these mailing lists (who are, given the context, assume=
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This is an automated response. There is no need to reply.
Hello, from Networking Telecommunication Services.
Your message regarding:
[Unet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/03/09 07:22:11
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core ContextManager.java
Log:
Updating version to 3.3.3-dev.
Revision ChangesPath
1.209 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/ContextManager.java
Index: ContextManager.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support.
So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's
implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr.
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I very seriously doubt this. Apache uses shared memory for the
scoreboard communication between the parent and child
processes. In
Apache 2.0, this is done using APR's
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support.
So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's
implementation is bogus, one can disable that when
I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these?
I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be the only one
that consistently has this problem. This is pretty amazing considering
the low number of subscribers.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
Hi,
I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these?
Why wouldn't it? It's a message sent to the list from a subscribed
address.
I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be the only
one
that consistently has this problem. This is pretty amazing considering
Perhaps it is a combination of two things.
On other lists like Linux-Kernel, subscribers are not clueless enough to
use an auto-responder that replies to messages that have Precedence:
bulk set. Additionally, most UNIX auto-responders will only send one
notice per configurable time period (i.e. a
-Original Message-
From: George Sexton
Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies
I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these?
I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be
the only one that consistently has this
Hi,
I don't know, I've forwarded your filtering suggestion to the general
Apache mail admin.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:22 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [OT]
Hello,
I have been searching through the archives for references to an apparently
common hung tomcat problem. We have been encountering this with our tomcat
installation (tomcat 4.1.24 / apache 1.3.27 / mod_jk 1.2.4) and I am trying to
piece together more information on how to fix it.
It
As per above, Solaris apr build appears to have bugs. As
yet I have not had
the time to look at why.
Does the above help?
I very seriously doubt this. Apache uses shared memory for
the scoreboard
communication between the parent and child processes. In
Apache 2.0, this is
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies
Hi,
I don't know, I've forwarded your filtering suggestion to the
general Apache mail admin.
One other thing.
Don't know if that would solve the amount of fake list
Hi,
Don't know if that would solve the amount of fake list subscription,
but
perhaps the mechanism like one on bugzilla (for creating accounts)
would
help.
I know it would require lot of work to implement that, but IMO it will
stop
the auto subscribe programs.
It will stop the auto-subscribe
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, and ezmlm supports this via a deny list functionality.
However, this feature is not available to list moderators such as
myself under the current setup and must be requested from the
general mail administrator.
AFAIK you can
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
I know it would require lot of work to implement that, but
IMO it will
stop
the auto subscribe programs.
It will stop the auto-subscribe programs, but at too great an
infrastructure cost I think. Anyways, it's not my call: you
can
Hi,
AFAIK you can subscribe people to the deny list as moderator by
sending a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You must
use your moderator's address when you do that.
Hmm, I've tried that without success in the past and was told to contact
apmail (which I did, and they took care of it). Maybe I can
kinman 2004/03/09 09:53:37
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet Tag:
tomcat_4_branch JspServletWrapper.java
Log:
- Patch by Torsten Fohrer
Fix for bug 16113: removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/03/09 10:35:14
Modified:webapps/manager status.xsd
Log:
- Scema fixes, submitted by Peter Lin.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +15 -15jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager/status.xsd
Index: status.xsd
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm2004/03/09 10:39:25
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
StatusTransformer.java
Log:
- Replace '?' with 0 which is easier to process using data binding tools.
- Submitted by Peter Lin.
Revision ChangesPath
Mike Charnoky wrote:
Is there a concise reference for this problem? It is intrinsically a
tomcat issue or is it a problem with a badly behaved app? How can I
determine what is causing the hang? Is there something in the
archives that I am completely missing?
In my case, Tomcat hangs were
remm2004/03/09 10:51:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardWrapper.java
Log:
- Fix object name.
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27547.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
in case some commiters don't subscribe to tomcat-user. I plan to post the prototype
tomcat monitor tonight. I just ran a couple of tests simulating 60 threads hitting the
homepage on TC5.1.18.
the monitor correctly registered an increase in activity while the 60 threads were
hitting the
Good morning All.
Please find attached a patch foe what I believe is the last erroneous
reference to lb:0.
It left here as an attachment and replicated it below.
Thanks,
Norm
--- configwebcom.xml.orig Fri Mar 5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27547.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2004/03/09 12:11:45
Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html resources.html
docs/faq misc.html
docs/faq/printer misc.html
xdocs-faq misc.xml
Log:
Added link to JavaRanch FAQ about Invoker Servlet.
Revision
yoavs 2004/03/09 12:12:56
Modified:docs/faq misc.html
docs/faq/printer misc.html
xdocs-faq misc.xml
Log:
Fixed JavaRanch link.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/misc.html
Index: misc.html
From: Al Banard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/bin/sh /usr/lib/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=install
/bin/cp
../../../build/jk2/apache2/mod_jk2.la
`pwd`/../../../build/jk2/apache2
...
/bin/sh /usr/lib/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=install
/bin/cp
../../../build/jk2/apache2/libjkjni.la
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per above, Solaris apr build appears to have bugs. As yet I have not
had the time to look at why.
I believe there's a problem with the file rights, not with SHM self. I think the
scoreboard is created by the init process, but later on when the child wants to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27547.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
amyroh 2004/03/09 13:45:02
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users
GroupForm.java UserForm.java
Log:
Fix 24085 - Display group and role list when validation fails.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +26 -3
amyroh 2004/03/09 13:49:37
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users
GroupForm.java UserForm.java
Log:
Port fix for 24085 from TC 5.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +27 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24085.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27552.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27552.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10903.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18250.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good morning All.
In jk_uriEnv.c, the getAttr function presently supports both uri and
path as properties. However both 'properties' return the same value,
namely uriEnv-uri.
This patch removes path from the getAttr properties list only, the nett
affect being that one less (duplicated) column
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/03/09 16:00:23
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteAdapter.java
Log:
- Much less verbose logging when there's a bad cookie. Unexpected exceptions
will be handled by service.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat
3.3.2. This is the latest stable release in the Tomcat 3 line, and users of
Tomcat 3.x are encouraged to upgrade to 3.3.2. This release includes
bugfixes from 3.3.1, as well as some new feature enhancements such as
support for
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration, and has
mod_jk2.so is there but libjkjni.so isn't, which seems to be what its
complaining about.
From a previous email ...
make clean build makeOutput
- This produces the attached makeOutput file and the following error to the
terminal:
libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish
71 matches
Mail list logo
