DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 10:37 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35930 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 10:37 ---
*** Bug 36087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tomcat 5.5.10: APR-SSL doesn't work in chrooted UML

[Markus Schönhaber]

Hello!

I'm trying to run Tomcat 5.5.10 [1] on user mode linux which is started in a 
chrooted environment but Tomcat hangs when initializing the SSL-Connector - 
i. e. the message
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol init
does never show up in the log. When I try to connect to the SSL-port the TCP 
handshake is made but no data at all is transmitted.

Everything runs fine if:
- The UML-kernel is *not* started in a chroot environment. (!)
- APR is used but SSL is turned off (ex. the Connector has set the "SSLEngine" 
config attribute  to "off").
- APR isn't used at all.

I don't have the slightest idea why it should matter whether UML is started in 
a chroot environment or not. To tell the truth, I don't have the slightest 
idea whether it's a bug in Tomcat, APR, Tomcat's native binding to APR, 
openssl, UML or if it's myself overlooking something absolutely obvious.

Any proposals what I could do to track this one down?

Regards
  mks


[1] In fact, it is a nightly build I made on August 6. - but the official 
5.5.10 binary behaves identically.

System spec:
- Gentoo Linux on both host and guest.
- Host kernel: vanilla 2.6.12.4 with blaisorblade's skas-2.6.12-v8.2 patch.
- Guest kernel: vanilla 2.6.12.4 with blaisorblade's uml-2.6.12-bs9 patch.
- APR 1.1.1.
- OpenSSL 0.9.7e.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bugreports for commons-daemon

[Longson, Robert]

Hi,

I'm writing to the tomcat-dev list as I understand that commons-daemon 
originated here. I've provided a number of bugreports, each with an associated 
patch to commons-daemon over the last three months (and also one for tomcat) 
but none of them have been applied.

Am I doing something wrong with bugzilla or is it just that there isn't a 
committer who understands commons daemon actively looking at the commons-dev 
list? If there are any tomcat developers willing to spend some time on 
commons-daemon I would appreciate it very much.

Best regards

Robert Longson 
  

 
The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, 
and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be 
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any 
dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

 

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] New: - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102

   Summary: jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
   Product: Tomcat 4
   Version: 4.1.27
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I was told by the jk connector component developer to open a new bug here.  He
closed the one in his queue as works-for-him (see bug # 35901). So here goes...
=
Jk version in use is a 1.2.14 binary.

Scenario: open jkstatus in broswer click worker #1, check "Stopped" and "Update
Worker".  Stat now shows stopped. 

Open second browser.  Navigate to the same jkstatus page.  Worker
#1 stat is OK.

Both browsers are IE5 one located on my workstation, one the browser for a
server, so broswer cash should not be involved. 

The same symptoms are seen in a single browser instance if you click worker #1
again, but not on a simple page refresh.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: bugreports for commons-daemon

[Yoav Shapira]

Howdy,
Commons-Daemon is fairly stagnant, as you've noticed.  Mladen looks at it
every now and then, as do I, but it's a function of how busy we are with
other things ;)  You can always build your own custom version if you need
something urgently...  The patches will be evaluated when someone gets
around to them, which will hopefully be soon but can never be guaranteed.

Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

> -Original Message-
> From: Longson, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:22 AM
> To: Tomcat Developer List (E-mail)
> Subject: bugreports for commons-daemon
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm writing to the tomcat-dev list as I understand that commons-daemon
> originated here. I've provided a number of bugreports, each with an
> associated patch to commons-daemon over the last three months (and also
> one for tomcat) but none of them have been applied.
> 
> Am I doing something wrong with bugzilla or is it just that there isn't a
> committer who understands commons daemon actively looking at the commons-
> dev list? If there are any tomcat developers willing to spend some time on
> commons-daemon I would appreciate it very much.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Robert Longson
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
> recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
> otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
> or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient,
> please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it
> from your computer.
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 15:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=15986)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15986&action=view)
ISAPI Redirect log


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 15:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=15987)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15987&action=view)
uriworkermap.properties


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 15:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15988)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15988&action=view)
workers.properties


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 15:41 ---
It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown length. 
There are two cases where this might happen: for a chunked request body, or if
there are request input filters in use such as mod_deflate.

The correct thing to do here in mod_jk is:

 if (r->proto_input_filters != r->input_filters
 || apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Transfer-Encoding")) {
 /* refuse to handle the body */
 }

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 15:48 ---
Does this mean mod_jk will simply not accept mod_deflate'd or chunked uploads? 
If so, that would buy us nothing...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jackie Gharibi is out of the office

[Jacqueline Gharibi]

I will be out of the office starting  04/08/2005 and will not return until
17/08/2005.

I will respond to your message when I return but should  you require an
urgent reply please contact Una O'Brien at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michael Bünermann/HBF/Minden/kampa/DE ist außer Haus .

[Michael . Buenermann]

Ich werde ab  08.08.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
10.08.2005.

Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden
Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte Herrn Bagehorn
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Herr Bagehorn hat die Rufnummer
0571/93425-80) Alternativ erreichen Sie mich auch über die Funk-Rufnummer:
0171/99 33 525.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 16:45 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Wouldn't it be a good thing to have this defined already after installation, 
> like catalina.home? Yes why isn't there any documentation on your websit to 
resolve this issue with what you mentioned.  But do you need to make this and 
environmental variable in Windows XP ? is that what you mean?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

[Jim Jagielski]

On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote:


We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk.  We've added a new
workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness", and
updated the jkstatus display page accordingly.  I wanted to get any
feedback or suggestions from the mailing list before submitting the
patch to bugzilla.  Thanks,



Please do so... There is also some overlap with Apache's
proxy load balancer as well, which I would want to fold
back in. For example, in Apache I added the bytraffic
method, which was then folded into mod_jk by Mladen.
So once "busyness" is added to mod_jk, I'll look on
adding it to the Apache tree.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 17:04 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown 
length. 

The AJP protocol handles request bodies of unknown length perfectly well.  It 
doesn't handle rogue modules like mod_deflate lying to it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 17:12 ---
So does this really mean that mod_deflate should simply not give a
content-length when it does not know it?  That would seem (quite) reasonable
(and correct).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 18:43 ---
Ralph, I'am not sure if your question was addressed to me, but this bug should 
definitly be fixed in the downloadable windows version, because of the missing 
environment varaible. But this can be only done by the tomcat developers. 
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10.exe has this bug, but startup.bat in jakarta-tomcat-
5.5.10.tar.gz sets the variable, so its just an issue with the .exe

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-09 20:13 ---
I marked the bug as fixed, which means the bug has been fixed, and I provided
you with an easy workaround, so can you please stop whining ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon

[Yoav Shapira]

Hey,
Is anyone speaking about Tomcat at ApacheCon 2005 US?  It will be nice to have
something...  And related to that, who's planning on going?

Yoav

--- Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:40:13 -0400
> From: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon
> 
> A reminder to all PMCs that the CFP for ApacheCon 2005 US expires at
> noon on Thursday. If your project has traditionally be unrepresented at
> ApacheCon, you might want to make sure that someone is submitting a talk
> from your project. We can only accept talks that get submitted, and the
> "why weren't there any talks about ..." questions that get asked every
> year invariably get answered with "because nobody submitted a talk about
> that."
> 
> Please ensure that your project is represented at ApacheCon.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Rich, for the ApacheCon planners.
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] New: - Bug with FormAuthenticator

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108

   Summary: Bug with FormAuthenticator
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.30
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I am using apache with JBoss 3.2.5 (Tomcat 5.0.30).
After logging in I get a HTTP Status 400 - Invalid direct reference to form 
login page.
It appears that the requestURI is null when it comes to 
org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc4.authenticator.FormAuthenticator

Could you update the FormAuthenticator to look up the j_uri from the request 
parameter when the saveRequestURI is null?
I'll appreciate the feedback.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] - Bug with FormAuthenticator

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |major
 OS/Version|other   |All
   Priority|P2  |P1




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36109] New: - Unsuported JNI version 65537

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109

   Summary: Unsuported JNI version 65537
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.27
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P1
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I have installed Apache tomcat 5.0.27. I have windows xp. I tried to run the 
apache tomcat 5.0.27. But it was not run sucessfully. I got the message in log 
file as follows

2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Running Service...
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Starting service...
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [364  javajni.c] [error] Unsuported JNI version 65537
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [770  prunsrv.c] [error] Failed initializing java 
C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\bin\bootstrap.jar
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [982  prunsrv.c] [error] ServiceStart returned 2
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Run service finished.
[2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Procrun finished.

Please help me out on this

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass "-ea" to Tomcat JRE

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-10 07:47 ---
Actually, "-ea" does not work even with the patch provided by Remy so I'm
reopening this issue. On a related note "-server" doesn't work either. Is this
one and the same issue or do I need to file a separate bug report?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36109] - Unsuported JNI version 65537

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-10 08:00 ---
This is INVALID simply for the reason that it's a commons-daemon problem, not 
a Tomcat problem.

That having been said, it's even INVALID as a commons-daemon problem since 
it's simply saying that your JVM version isn't supported.  I'm just too lazy 
to lookup the duplicate for a cite :).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass "-ea" to Tomcat JRE

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-10 08:19 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Actually, "-ea" does not work even with the patch provided by Remy so I'm
> reopening this issue. On a related note "-server" doesn't work either. Is 
this
> one and the same issue or do I need to file a separate bug report?

On a related note, filing a bug for "-server" will politely get a response to 
RTFM, and will be marked as INVALID.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass "-ea" to Tomcat JRE

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-10 08:26 ---
William,

I am discussing the WinXP service configuration manager. I can't insert -server
into the startup script file as I would under Linux (because there no longer is
one under Windows).

I also ran a Google search for "server vm" across the online documentation and
found nothing useful there so please if this *is* documented somewhere I would
appreciate you pointing out where.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass "-ea" to Tomcat JRE

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-10 08:29 ---
Nevermind, I just realized I need to change the "Java Virtual Machine" value
under the Java tab. All this time I was looking for an option of "client" or
"server" and it never occured to me I'd have to specify the full DLL path :)

Thanks anyway!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]