hgomez 2004/02/27 00:34:18
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
jk/native2/include jk_worker.h
Log:
Fix problem with ErrorDocument and Apache 2.0.
By default now, WE DON'T touch the headers
Revision
hgomez 2004/02/27 00:34:34
Modified:jk/native2 CHANGES.txt
Log:
Update changelog
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +13 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/CHANGES.txt
Index: CHANGES.txt
===
hgomez 2004/02/27 00:35:39
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml
Log:
Update documentation with noErrorHeader (lb won't touch headers)
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +7 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configwebcom.xml
Index: configwebcom.xml
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
if my last patch for PCRE functions gets accepted,
this patch to the makefile makes usage of the AP_PCRE on Win32.
Guenter.
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.dsp.diff
###
---
hgomez 2004/02/27 00:37:48
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_status.c
Log:
Gunter addon (and initial stylesheet)
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +5 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c
Index: jk_worker_status.c
hgomez 2004/02/27 00:40:04
Modified:jk/native2/include jk_worker.h
Log:
Oups,
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include/jk_worker.h
Index: jk_worker.h
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heureusement que nous avons nos cousins québécois pour corriger
nos petites boulettes :)
jfarcand2004/02/26 09:21:32
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
LocalStrings_fr.properties
Log:
Fix minor typo.
Revision
hgomez 2004/02/27 01:07:23
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c
Log:
Fix BR27281, when user stop its browser return 206 instead of 500
Revision ChangesPath
1.60 +4 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good evening Henri.
Can the 'avaiable' be 'available' by the time of the jk2 release? :-)
Norm
P.S. Great work regardless of my nitpicking.
P.S.2 Gunter deliberately puts a few crumbs in his contributions so others
less gifted can contribute something.
hgomez 2004/02/27 00:37:48
hgomez 2004/02/27 01:24:45
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_status.c
Log:
Fix typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.50 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c
Index: jk_worker_status.c
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri.
Can the 'avaiable' be 'available' by the time of the jk2 release? :-)
Norm
P.S. Great work regardless of my nitpicking.
P.S.2 Gunter deliberately puts a few crumbs in his contributions so others
less gifted can contribute something.
Fixed.
I wonder how to
Good evening from Down Under.
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri.
Can the 'avaiable' be 'available' by the time of the jk2 release? :-)
Norm
P.S. Great work regardless of my nitpicking.
P.S.2 Gunter deliberately puts a few crumbs in his contributions so
others
less gifted can
NormW wrote:
Good evening from Down Under.
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri.
Can the 'avaiable' be 'available' by the time of the jk2 release? :-)
Norm
P.S. Great work regardless of my nitpicking.
P.S.2 Gunter deliberately puts a few crumbs in his contributions so
others
less gifted can
Good evening Henri.
NormW wrote:
Good evening from Down Under.
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri.
Can the 'avaiable' be 'available' by the time of the jk2 release? :-)
Norm
P.S. Great work regardless of my nitpicking.
P.S.2 Gunter deliberately puts a few crumbs in his
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dues to the environment the word upgrade tends to send shivers down some
of my team!
We have a strict complaince system to work under.
This is not just a tomcat issue, but an Opensource issue where bug fixes are
released as upgrades. Most vendors release patches so that an existing
version can
Hi
I'm mystified as to how the isapi_redirect filter treats interacts with
the NTFS permissions set on the physical dll file.
My intent is to restrict access to my Tomcat application to a users in a
particular Active Directory group.
I've tried to do this by setting the NTFS permissions on
Dear All,
Testing the jk2-2.0.3 cvs we seem to get this error, which makes 2.0.3-dev
useable for us.
I can only assume others are not seeing this (apache 1.3.26 + mod_perl) on
Solaris 2.8 (sparc). Has anyone had any success with 1.3.x on Solaris with
the jk2-dev code?
I an getting apr and
Hi,
Testing the jk2-2.0.3 cvs we seem to get this error, which makes 2.0.3-dev
useable for us.
you mean 2.0.4-dev?
I can only assume others are not seeing this (apache 1.3.26 + mod_perl) on
Solaris 2.8 (sparc). Has anyone had any success with 1.3.x on Solaris
with the jk2-dev code?
Hi,
I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2.
Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean the IIS
port.
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the
release.
MT.
-
To
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2.
Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean the IIS
port.
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the
release.
Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!!
Hi all,
I would like to get the MMAP code back into CVS which was removed with version 1.36:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c?r1=1.35r2=1.36
This code would enable the scoreboard working on NetWare; and probably on other
platforms too where
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to get the MMAP code back into CVS which was removed with version 1.36:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c?r1=1.35r2=1.36
This code would enable the scoreboard working on NetWare; and probably on other
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2.
Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean the IIS
port.
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the
release.
Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help
Hi Greg,
look at your apr.h for APR_HAS_MMAP and tell us how this is set...
#define APR_HAS_MMAP 1
thats strange. Is is possible that there's a permission issue with creating the file?
Can you please try to configure the shm file to be created in a public writable dir,
f.e. /tmp
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we
can make the
release.
Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!!
How did you came to that number?
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we
can make the
release.
Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!!
How did you came to that number?
I'm seeing only 25 of them.
I've also have some problems with
Hi,
Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff
thanks, Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Anyone has a clue why I'm receiving this on each mail send to this group?
-Original Message-
From: Autoresponder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please update your email address...
Reply-To: Autoresponder [EMAIL
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff
Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2.
Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean
the IIS
port.
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the
release.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2004 13:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 buglets
Hi Greg,
look at your apr.h for APR_HAS_MMAP and tell us how this is set...
#define APR_HAS_MMAP 1
thats strange. Is
Hi,
found yesterday that the jk2 folder belows tomcat-docs is now removed, and the link
now goes online to apache.org?
what was the reason for this change?
Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I'm looking now why jk2_init() can't find child XXX in scoreboard.
The MPM should BEFORE after us ? :
ap_hook_child_init(jk2_child_init, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_LAST);
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Henri Gomez wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff
Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object...
That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff
Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object...
That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR.
I agree, but let fix this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16331.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
jean-frederic clere wrote:
That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR.
sure, agreed;
and I work closely together with those maintaining Apache at Novell, as well as with
the core OS folks; but I cant expect that I have mmap support in APR before the next
half year...
I
Hi,
Permissions should be ok. It does create a file, but with 0 size (even
though we have set something like 16m)
ie:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 0 Feb 27 12:31
cr.sandwich.pfizer.com_81.shm
Compared to the old version (same config bar the name and old conector
used)
hgomez 2004/02/27 06:24:57
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Move translate to APR_HOOK_MIDDLE and make sure mod_rewrite will be
before us
Revision ChangesPath
1.69 +8 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
hgomez 2004/02/27 06:25:32
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_shm.c
Log:
Revert to old code until APR shm problem is fixed...
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +85 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c
Index: jk_shm.c
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we
can make the
release.
Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!!
While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278.
Seems to be a
Hi,
I've started migrating the jakarta-tomcat-catalina module to the Apache
License v2.0 per the instructions in
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html. I assume no one else is
doing this at this time, so no conflicts or issues should arise? I
should be done within a few hours, depending
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278.
Seems to be a problem with 16bits int ?
Sure :-).
Well I'd like to use apr types on all function calls, returning APR_STATUS,
etc...
Some work has already been done, but
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278.
Seems to be a problem with 16bits int ?
Sure :-).
Well I'd like to use apr types on all function calls, returning APR_STATUS,
etc...
Ok, but for next
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27293.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/02/27 07:06:54
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
DefaultServlet.java
Log:
- Bug 27293: Fix if-unmodified-since check, using the old-and-simple trick of
adding 1000.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27293.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I've finished migrating this module to license 2.0, added the NOTICE
file, and tested a clean anonymous build from scratch -- no problem.
I've also hand-inspected a dozen or so files to make sure they're fine,
again no problems.
Assuming no objects, I'll proceed with
yoavs 2004/02/27 07:14:09
Modified:coyote/src/test/org/apache/coyote SimpleAdapter.java
http11/src/test/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
FileTester.java RandomAdapter.java TestAdapter.java
jk/native/domino config.h
On 27 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently many C files don't have the license?
This is bad.
The insert_license.pl script from almost the same location that holds
the Java file you've used worked quite well for me to mass add
licenses to files in Gump.
You'd probably need to add .c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yoavs 2004/02/27 07:14:09
Modified:coyote/src/test/org/apache/coyote SimpleAdapter.java
http11/src/test/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
FileTester.java RandomAdapter.java TestAdapter.java
jk/native/domino
/* First make sure the file exists and is big enough
*/
rc=apr_file_open( file, shm-fname,
APR_READ | APR_WRITE | APR_CREATE | APR_BINARY,
APR_WREAD|APR_WWRITE|APR_WEXECUTE,
globalShmPool);
Thanks Guenter,
Same sort of issue:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Greg,
Same sort of issue:
[Fri Feb 27 15:12:08 2004] (error ) [jk_shm.c (163)] shm.create(): error
creating /tmp/cr.sandwich.pfizer.com_81.shm 2117992 22 0x1f5020 Invalid
argument
[Fri Feb 27 15:12:08 2004] (error ) [jk_shm.c (238)] shm.create(): error
mmapping
This has happened to a few people in the last few months. Whomever from
radgametools that is subscribed here needs to unsubscribe out of
curteousy to the rest of the group, or subscribe on of these accepted
addresses they list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/27/04 6:33:38 AM
Anyone has a clue why I'm
From: Jeff Tulley
This has happened to a few people in the last few months.
Whomever from radgametools that is subscribed here needs to
unsubscribe out of curteousy to the rest of the group, or
subscribe on of these accepted
addresses they list.
In fact I'm receiving tree mails on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
In fact I'm receiving tree mails on each post i make (_very_ annoying
).
1. Thank you for your enquiry or message. (from
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. Dear PC Mechanic Supporter, (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
3. Thank you for your email to The Bridal Shop. (from
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
The second one has a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
There are a variety of causes. We've seen a great increase in the
number of 'smart' spam mailers than can subscribe themselves to our
lists. Accordingly, the amount of things like the above has increased.
The fact that only you get these three messages suggest it's your
computer or a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Guenter Knauf
I dont use a
SPAM mailer such as Outlook; so chances that a worm has
subscribed to one of those lists from my machine is == 0.
:-).
In addition I believe that many do just the same as I: they
have a separate account for list post, and a white list which
only
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
Nonetheless, I've sent new unsubscribe instructions to the
above three addresses, which I can do as a moderator for
tomcat-dev. Try sending a message to this list in a few
minutes and see if you still get all three responses, or if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I think the files
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf
are broken.
I've tested in under linux with gs and under Windows with Acrobat
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:07 AM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common
jk_worker_ajp13.c
hgomez 2004/02/27 01:07:23
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c
Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2004/02/27 10:48:22
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp isapi.dsw
Log:
Remove unneeded link targets to apr libraries.
Use the dependencies instead.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsp
Howdy,
I think the files
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf
are broken.
They're broken on the web site, but they're OK in CVS:
mturk 2004/02/27 10:53:30
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp
Log:
Remove unneeded linker paths to apr and pcre libraries.
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsp
Index: isapi.dsp
kinman 2004/02/27 10:54:34
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TextOptimizer.java
Log:
- Fix bugzilla 27300: Wrong Smap when jsp comments are present
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -6
HI,
Ok, two have gone.
I'm sending you the header's of the rest two I receive.
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Good, we're making progress. I've booted [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] off tomcat-dev, in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which
I unsubscribed earlier. Hopefully
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
truk2004/02/27 11:10:07
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c jk_uriMap.c
Log:
Use apache pcre functions when HAVE_AP_PCRE is defined. From Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +16 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c
Index:
truk2004/02/27 11:14:33
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 Makefile.apxs.in Makefile.in
NWGNUmakefile mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Remove HAS_PCRE and add HAS_AP_PCRE. From Guenter Knauf.
apache2 doesn't need --with-pcre now and is silently ignored.
pcre
mturk 2004/02/27 11:15:45
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsw
Log:
Change the dependencies so that VS7 makes
correct solution file
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +6 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsw
Index: isapi.dsw
mturk 2004/02/27 11:28:51
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c
Log:
Remove the SF_NOTIFY_AUTH_COMPLETE define
checking. If someone wishes to compile jk2 he will anyhow
need the platform SDK. Any sdk since year 2000 has that
defined in the httpfilt.h
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I think the files
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-
doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf
are broken.
They're broken on the web site, but they're OK in
Howdy,
Maybe it occurs because I upload the docs using a zip. I'll try to
improve this in the next release.
Good theory, I didn't check that. But I think for right now I'll
overwrite the PDFs on the site with the ones from CVS manually. Thanks,
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any
Howdy,
Maybe it occurs because I upload the docs using a zip. I'll try to
improve this in the next release.
Good theory, I didn't check that. But I think for right now I'll
overwrite the PDFs on the site with the ones from CVS manually.
Thanks,
A manual copy seems to work fine. Note size
A manual copy seems to work fine. Note size difference, before:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 remm jakarta 46121 Feb 14 11:27 serverStartup.pdf
after:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 remm jakarta 46175 Feb 27 11:40 serverStartup.pdf
Thank you very much! everything is OK now :) Good to see such a beautiful
diagrams!
When I browse to a Coyote Connector in Tomcat's admin in 4.1.30, I get
an HTTP 500 error - Error retrieving attribute allowTrace. I know the
allowTrace functionality was added about a month ago, and was not a
required attribute on the connector.
This functionality works in Tomcat 5.0.19, but not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15400.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Michal Kostrzewa wrote:
Hi,
I think the files
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf
are broken.
When attempting to open them Acrobat Reader
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:07 AM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common
jk_worker_ajp13.c
hgomez 2004/02/27 01:07:23
Modified:jk/native2/common
Good morning All.
From my source, a 302 code is Found - the requested resource lies
temporarily under a different URI, which doesn't seem to match very closely
the text of the default noWorkerMsg.
Speaking of which, the word 'temporary' in the #define noWorkerMsg should be
'temporarily'.
Norm
Actually, if I am not mistaken, the attached txt file patches the
problem. An IntrospectionHelper.setProperty was needed for allowTrace.
On 5.0.x this was done automatically by setting a property in the
setAllowTrace setter. Then the properties were set into
IntrospectionHelper en masse later.
Hi Jeff,
I tested this before the 4.1.30 release, and just retested it,
and it continues to work for me without your patch. Since the
protocolHandler doesn't support the allowTrace property, the
setProperty() is unnecessary in Tomcat 5.0.x and shouldn't make
a difference in Tomcat 4.1.30. It is
markt 2004/02/27 14:03:03
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
UserDatabaseRealm.java
Log:
Provide an implementation for getName() and getPassword(). Found this whilst trying
to use CLIENT-CERT authentication with the Sun web services
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
