- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads
ThreadPool.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:40 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin service.bat
> billbarker2003/12/23 20:40:43
>
> Modified:catalina/src/bin service.bat
> Log:
> Quot
While editing 'service.bat', I noticed that it seems that we are shipping
all of the '.bat' and '.sh' files without including an Apache license.
Before I launch into a realy boring project of fixing this, I wanted to
hear other opinions on how necessary it is.
This message is intended only fo
- Original Message -
From: "Reshat Sabiq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25681] - HTTP request params lost when sent
with a URL ending with a folder w/o '/' at the end of URL
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: TC5 Adding service.bat
>
> Hi,
>
> Can we add some batch file to the TC5 installation that
> will enable users to easily inst
ealmBase.java
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Bill Barker wrote:
> >
> >> N.B. The Filter mapping code looks broken to me. It looks like if I
> >> have a
> >> mapping for a url-pattern '*.jsp' that has
> >> INCLUDE,
> >> then it wi
N.B. The Filter mapping code looks broken to me. It looks like if I have a
mapping for a url-pattern '*.jsp' that has INCLUDE,
then it will incorrectly match a .
However, I haven't actually tested it. :).
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote i
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
RealmBase.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
You could try asking on the users list for more info. TC 3.2.x has been
unsupported for a very long time. The only advice I can offer is to upgrade
to a supported version of Tomcat (e.g. 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x).
- Original Message -
From: "Katalin Fónagy (IJ/ETH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
list ;-).
This means that RealmBase.findSecurityConstraints is going to have to change
to only pass back the 'best-match' constraints. At least this isn't an
interface change. The decision on whether to change the Realm interface, or
move the header processing to AuthenticatorBase is
Yes, this looks like it changed between pfd3 to fr :(. Security-constraints
now work like 'grants' instead of 'constraints'. IMHO, this make the 2.4
security model all but useless.
It would be natural to configure something like:
Client Area
/clients/*
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
> Jeanfrancois Arcand
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
> jfarcand2003/12/01 12:44:14
>
> Modified:http11/src/jav
The "secureCookie" attribute was added to 3.3.2 only to allow backwards
compatibility with 3.3.1. Like Tomcat 4 and higher, the default is 'true'.
It's a pretty small patch:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/mod
ules/session/SessionId.java.diff?r1=1.20&r2=1.2
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Larry Isaacs wrote:
>
> > Hi Remy,
> >
> > Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
> > I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
> > new behavior:
> >
> > U
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I got a support question about LB with mod_jk 2 (and I saw posts about
> that on tomcat-user).
>
> Either there's something I don't understand, or the
> jk2_get_most_suitable_worker method in jk_worker_lb will a
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Mark Thomas
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Mark Thomas as a Tomcat committer. He has
> contibuted a
onnector.java CoyoteRequest.java LocalStrings.properties
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > I'm -1 on this. It gives the Servlet no indication that anything is
wrong,
> > and leaves junk in the input stream for the next keep-alive request. I
> > think that it would be better t
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Response.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > bill
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 1:45 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteConnector.java CoyoteRequest.java LocalStrings.properties
> remm2003/1
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:10 AM
Subject: [5.0] content-type and charset issues
> Hi,
>
> Tomcat 5.0 always adds a charset=ISO-8859-1 to the content type. While
> this
See inline.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony LaPaso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:15 PM
Subject: TC 5.0.14 Breaks UTF-8 Content via HTTP Header
> Hi everyone,
>
> It seems a change to TC v5.0.14 may have broken the se
"Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ApacheCon 2003 will be held in Las Vegas this November 16-19. Who is
going
> to be there from Tomcat Dev? Maybe we can coordinate Tomcat get
together...
> :-)
>
I have way too much work to stay for the conference :(. But
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Connector ObjectName includes address
> Jan Luehe wrote:
>
> >
> >>>Bill Barker wrote:
> >>>
> >>&g
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Connector ObjectName includes address
> Bill Barker wrote:
> >>Current
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Connector ObjectName includes address
> Currently, connector objectname includes address in this format:
>
> domain:type=Connector,p
AFAIK, IPlanet is still supported. However, there hasn't been an active
developer on the project for a very long time, and so there hasn't been
anyone to generate the binaries. I would suggest getting the source distro,
and compiling yourself. And, unless you plan to offer the binaries back,
sto
"Jan Luehe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Remy,
>
> >> I agree we should help users come up with reasonable config values,
> >> but I'm just afraid rejecting any maxThreads < 10 or < 20 will send the
> >> wrong message, as if there was a bug in the way we dispatch i
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Remy has been packaging Jasper in the j-t-4.1.x-src tarball (as "jasper").
- Original Message -
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/
> Hi,
>
> I am "pl
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Coyote Connector logging
>
>
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> >
> >> The Coyote docs state the followi
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: jk2 evolution plan
> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I can help out.
> >
> > This is a significant change for a minor
> +
> +// Optimize on a common case.
> +// If the source is going to fill up all the space in buffer,
may
> +// as well write it directly to the output, and avoid an extra
copy
> +if ( len == limit && end == 0) {
> +out.realWriteChars( src, of
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Luehe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: How to make CLIENT-CERT protection work?
> Consider the following scenario:
>
> 1. Client sends POST request (with content type o
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> >>> Do you speak about the ${xxx} propert
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was:
Important requirement : Re: [next]
You will probably get more traction by posting to commons-dev. While
tomcat-dev still has a couple of commons committers (and, no, I'm not one of
them) that hang out here, its not like the old days :(.
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers Li
> @@ -510,14 +509,19 @@
>}
>
>this.contentType = contentType.substring(0, beginCharsetParam);
> -String tail = contentType.substring(beginCharsetParam + 1);
> +// Trim the semicolon preceding the charset
> +int charsetSemi = this.contentType.l
> +/*
> + * Remove the charset param (if any) from the Content-Type, and
use it
> + * to set the response encoding.
> + * The most recent response encoding setting will be appended
to the
> + * response Content-Type (as its charset param) by
getCont
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib
> Bill Barker a écrit :
>
> > - Original Me
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:28 AM
Subject: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib
> In TC 4.1.x and 5.0.x there is support for endorsed lib but
> nothing like this in tc 3.3.2-dev.
- Original Message -
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Committing binaries in CVS [Was] RE: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
> Remy
Try http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/v4.1.28-alpha/. The 'alpha'
is just because it is still in it's evaluation stage. It's likely to
graduate to at least beta (if not 'stable'). However, your ability to test
it on an os/390 system makes you particularly valuable to the developers, so
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteConnector.java
> luehe 2003/10/05 14:00:38
>
> Modified:catalina/src/
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.j
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
> remm2003/10/04 11:05:29
>
> Modified:util/java/org/ap
The only reason I know of not to use the MAIN branch is that it has JMX
dependencies.
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml
> Remy Maucherat a écrit :
>
> > Henri Gomez wrote:
> >
> >> Re
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Do you agree to use Coyote2 as the default HTTP connector
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] Schedule change
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > By the way, is there any pla
By the way, is there any plan to certify Tomcat 5? As everyone knows, Sun
controls the RI now. While it's rumored to be based on Tomcat code, that's
not the same thing. Also, as everyone knows, Geronimo is planning to test
the Sun/Apache agreement by getting the test-suite under the Sun/Apache
a
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: [5.0] Schedule change
> Hi,
>
> The signals I'm getting from Sun about the schedule of the
> specifications is highly confu
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Jakarta Tomcat 4.1 XSS vulnerability
> On Mon, September 29, 2003 1at 2:32 pm, Bill Bar
Remy has already patched the HTTP Connector for this one (both Tomcat 4&5).
I believe that the patch still needs to be ported to the JK2 Connector.
- Original Message -
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 2:55 AM
Subject: TC 3.3.2
> Hi to all,
>
> I commited the last part of clean imports and started to take a look
> at bugzilla where many reports
I'm a bit confused by the scope for authentication. For purposes of
discussion, assume that there is a sub-section of my web-app that is
protected via:
Protected Area
/protected/*
somerole
If a user successfully authenticates to access a resource in th
For me, doing a "cvs log" doesn't mention a 1.2.5 tag.
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: jk 1.2.5 release : Was: mod_jk does not detect a hung Tomcat
> Did th
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk does not detect a hung Tomcat
>
>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > David Rees a écrit :
> >
> >> Henri Gomez said:
> >>
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:42 AM
Subject: AJP13 in TC 3.3.2-dev
> Did we still use in TC 3.3.2-dev the Ajp13 code in
> org.apache.tomcat.modules.server or the one in J
It doesn't look like you got the servletapi-4 project (or it is in the wrong
place). Try doing:
ant download
to make certain that you've got all of the jars you need to build Tomcat.
If you are behind a firewall, you'll need to set the values of 'proxy.host'
and 'proxy.port' in your build.prope
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Narrow down the list of JARs to be scanned for TLDs
> Jan Luehe wrote:
> > Currently, any JARs in the classl
Sorry, they were small, and I missed them.
Checked in now. Thanks again!
- Original Message -
From: "Kazuhiro Kazama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update Tomcat version to 5 in doc
Done. Thanks much!
- Original Message -
From: "Kazuhiro Kazama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:59 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Update Tomcat version to 5 in documents
> Hi,
>
> This is a patch which changes Tomcat version strings from "Tomcat 4"
- Original Message -
From: "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [x] Beta
>
I've lost the original message
I've gone ahead and re-set the previously Resolved bugs back to Resolved.
My apologies to the very many people that I've spammed tonight doing this
:(.
I didn't reset the Assigned field on the grounds that most of the bugs are
ancient.
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL
+1 From me as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: [patch] wrong rx to invalid url
> Yes it can be, good catch.
>
> Keith
>
> | -Original Messag
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEnd
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
> On 12 Sep 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Being as lazy as anyone else ;-), we prefer diff files. However, you're
script are very nice. I'd prefer that a little more attention was paid to
W9x support (since you've got several statements that will bomb on W9x).
- Original Message -
From: "R. W. Stavros, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> remm2003/09/08 02:31:38
>
> Modified:.build.properties.default
> Log:
> - New PureTLS version.
> - I'll be including PureTLS support in 5.0.11+.
>
While I'm +1, this may cause problems since at the moment To
It works fine for me. I just did an update on j-t-c, and a clean build of
Tomcat 5, and it worked fine (well, up until it got to the docs, but I've
still got an old version of xalan in ant :).
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Su
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: jakarta-tomcat-connector release cleanup
> I have promised to setup the tomcat connector releases so that they
> can be mirrored when I perform the
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native CHANGES.txt
> glenn 2003/09/06 20:49:40
>
> Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
> Log:
> Update changes
>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/etc bootstrap.MF
> remm2003/09/06 10:19:36
>
> Modified:catalina/etc bootstrap.MF
> Log:
> - Modify
I'd go for 2) personally. If you force the POST parameters to UTF-8 (which
I understand is what '3' does), you break almost every web-app out there.
Granted, the request line (including the query-string) should be UTF-8, but
I haven't tested how many browsers actually enforce this. The POST
param
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.10] Tag tomorrow
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > I can post new binarie
I can post new binaries for procrun tomorrow (PST) to BZ (now that Daemon is
in commons-proper, I can't check-in directly :-(). This includes a patch
from JFC for W9x (that I missed in the last build), and a patch from Mladin
to limit memory usage in the console. Neither is particularly critical,
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 22715
> Resending. I seem to be having e-mail problems...
>
> The patches below (TC5 and TC4) fix bug 22715 in that they ensure that xml
>
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
> FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
> and glibc 2.1.
And I thought my
I know that "patches are always welcome", but a variant of this has been in
3.3.2-dev (aka nightly) for a very long time.
- Original Message -
From: "Kubo Hiroshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:13 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 22905 - set sec
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:58 AM
Subject: [5.0.10] New build ?
> I think releasing a new build at the end of this week would be a good
> idea, given that most issues
- Original Message -
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:46 AM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common
jk_uri_worker_map.h jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
>
> > -Original Messa
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/connector
connector.jsp
> > The AJP connector still lies,
>
> Can you tell me wh
I'll put this one in in the interest of time, but Marc should be given karma
(like any other Tomcat committer) to j-t-c, if he doesn't have it already.
"Marc Saegesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G, the attachment got stripped from my last message. Here's the
Patch committed. Thanks much!
"Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry. Only just noticed the attachment was removed somewhere along the
way.
> Contents of patch below.
>
> Index: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java
> =
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:40 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/connector
connector.jsp
> amyroh 2003/08/28 19:40:52
>
> Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Amy Roh wrote:
> >
> >> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>
> >>> Amy Roh wro
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating]
> resend again. my email's been getting lost for some reason.
>
Well, at least SOBIG is onl
"Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Tomcat Developers List"
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
>
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >---
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Bill Barker wrote:
> >>Tim Funk wrote:
>
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Tim Funk wrote:
> > Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
> > 1) startup.bat worked fine, but t
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
> 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw
Just realized that I marked the wrong box (d*** hanging chads :). Changing
my vote to 'Alpha' for reasons given below.
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Remy Maucherat"
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
>
>
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
2) Authoriza
Client-certs don't work with JkCoyote on 4.1.24. You need to use 4.1.27
(or, at least the tomcat-jk2.jar).
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Sifuentes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: JkCoyoteHandler with SSL
While using Apache2.0
The easiest solution would be to change the map_uri_to_worker contract to be
that the uri parameter is modifiable. Then Apache can dup it using the
request's pool, it looks like IIS is doing this most of the time anyway, and
Netscape isn't using map_uri_to_worker at all. That leave Domino, which
I'm going to assume that you're using 4.1.x. In this case, you are using
the wrong Factory. You want something like:
Connector httpsConnector = embeddedTomcat.createConnector(null,
configuration.getHttpsPort(), true);
CoyoteServerSocketFactory serverSocketFactory =
(CoyoteServerSocketFacto
501 - 600 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
