Re: Next release

Remy Maucherat wrote: Another thing is that we might want to write the next Tomcat for JDK 1.5. Anything specific in JDK 1.5? We already spoke a bit about NIO in some form, but that's JDK 1.4. Annotations :) (I saw EJB 3) I have to assume we're going to have some annotations defined in the sp

Re: Movie

My understanding was that this is more applicable to senders' ISPs, rather than the receiving side. The best other option i could think of is using signatures, like Thawte's, however, this only appears to be a viable option on a voluntary basis (i.e., a subscriber could say, don't accept emails

Re: Spam vulnerability at apache

had replied to the reply-to address you would never have seen it and the mailing list software would likely have disabled the address. It's probably also a recent thing. -Paul Reshat Sabiq wrote: I'm sorry to report that sending the message below, caused the following to show up in my m

Re: Spam vulnerability at apache

d from the OutPost/1.800eMail Server Because "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is not a valid username Original message, less any attachments, follows: ==== ... Reshat Sabiq wrote: Hi, I extremely apologize for this message, bu

Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

Hi, I extremely apologize for this message, but i think this needs to be figured out. I just yesterday registered my new email address with tomcat-dev, and i received the spam below almost immediately thereafter. Only a few people are aware of this email address, so the origin of spam info 99%

Re: [OT] Re: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-nioserver/

thwhile, in the ideal scenario, the container could toggle its mode from "thread-per-user", to NIO, to what SEDA does, depending on load, and some optional config settings. But i still don't know if NIO is just an equivalent of a fancy way of playing w/ max threads. :) Reshat Sa

Re: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-nioserver/

Samuel Cheung wrote: Sorry, I have a newbie question on this subject. If the servlet API adds support for java.nio library (described in section 3.3 here) http://www.coredevelopers.net/library/j2ee/servlet24/ar01s03.jsp#d0e533, then will it make sense for servlet container (e.g. Tomcat

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25681] - HTTP request params lost when sent with a URL ending with a folder w/o '/' at the end of URL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya

Re: Likely bug in org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet (Tomcat 5)

Remy Maucherat wrote: Reshat Sabiq wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Reshat Sabiq wrote: I think i found a bug in Tomcat 5 implementation (J2EE 1.4-DR). I would highly appreciate if somebody could provide a brief description of what includeUri, and requestUri below stand for. I looked at the

Re: Likely bug in org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet (Tomcat 5)

Remy Maucherat wrote: Reshat Sabiq wrote: I think i found a bug in Tomcat 5 implementation (J2EE 1.4-DR). I would highly appreciate if somebody could provide a brief description of what includeUri, and requestUri below stand for. I looked at the comments in Constants, but can't make

Likely bug in org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet (Tomcat 5)

I think i found a bug in Tomcat 5 implementation (J2EE 1.4-DR). I would highly appreciate if somebody could provide a brief description of what includeUri, and requestUri below stand for. I looked at the comments in Constants, but can't make out a lot out of them. Please see my comment below. o

Re: [5.0] Schedule change

Remy Maucherat wrote: Reshat Sabiq wrote: I'm a newbie on this list, but i think 2.4/2.0 draft 3 5.0.14 is a good idea. At least it's more specific than Beta. P.S. Btw, as far as bugs i couldn't use custom error pages in Sun's 1.4 Beta 2 (Tomcat 5). Reported to Sun

Re: [5.0] Schedule change

I'm a newbie on this list, but i think 2.4/2.0 draft 3 5.0.14 is a good idea. At least it's more specific than Beta. P.S. Btw, as far as bugs i couldn't use custom error pages in Sun's 1.4 Beta 2 (Tomcat 5). Reported to Sun, and they forwarded me to Apache, and i didn't have time. Could report

Re: IP address Assignment problem

: Reshat Sabiq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: IP address Assignment problem Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:16:31 -0500 Ayoub Raffoul wrote: Hello, I'm running Apache

Re: IP address Assignment problem

Ayoub Raffoul wrote: Hello, I'm running Apache Tomcat ver. 4.1 on a Windows 2000 server. The machine has multipe IP addresses. I have configured Apache Tomcat in server.xml to run on a specific IP address port 80 as follows (fake IP address): port="80" minProcessors="5" ma

Re: Fwd: Re: security hole on windows tomcat?

If the bug was caused by adding %20 to a page/folder in URL, then i didn't reproduce it in Tomcat 5. I got 404 (the only bad thing is that 404's don't appear to be customizable with error-page directives in web.xml). What would be a good list to watch for these kinds of bugs in Tomcat? Thanks.

jsp:include

Hi, There's a bug in J2EE 1.4 RI Beta 2 that prevents me from using a custom tag: instanceof operator treats TagSupport subclass as SimpleTagSupport instance. This leaves me only one appropriate option: subclass the class that implements jsp:include tag, and overwrite a method in it. I'd apprec