Craog
I have a feeling that whatever is the same will be a lot of
piecemeal here
and there, excluding of course, web-app documentation. So
far yourself,
Pier, and Henri are the only three TC developers to post
their position on
that (re: inter-version relevancy).
Pier and I also
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Craog
I have a feeling that whatever is the same will be a lot of
piecemeal here
and there, excluding of course, web-app documentation. So
far yourself,
Pier, and Henri are the only three TC developers to post
their position on
that (re:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 7/7/01 9:33 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I'm fine with Anakia, XSLT, Cocoon, Stylebook, Docbook, or whatever
... but IF AND ONLY IF the tags for use by the document authors are well
documented, and the page generation
on 7/7/01 9:33 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I'm fine with Anakia, XSLT, Cocoon, Stylebook, Docbook, or whatever
... but IF AND ONLY IF the tags for use by the document authors are well
documented, and the page generation procedure is amenable to Ant scripting
(not a
Developer in the sense of this sentence is a Tomcat
developer. User is the people that just want to download, install,
configure, and utilize Tomcat as a servlet container.
Agree. That's why I suggested that we need to separate Developer Guide from
User/Administrator Guide. I believed
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:06:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
* Docs should live in the source tree of the project that they
are about. Although Henri's suggestion for jakarta-tomcat-docs
is noble, what you'll find in practice
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Yes, we obviously need pointers in a top-level README on where the docs
went.
I'm willing to collaborate on these types of docs. On a slight tangent,
I'd like to point out
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 7/2/01 5:58 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent :) Anakia is a tool written by Jon to translate XML into HTML
(correct me if I'm wrong) based on the same language that WebMacro uses...
It generates
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Rob S. wrote:
This seems to be one of the questions that comes up and never gets answered
(re: docs, not Jon's behavior ;) I'm not sure what magical solution will
get people to read docs. Frankly, I'd just like to get started. Anakia
works for Jakarta,
Yep, thanks
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Rob S. wrote:
We've started writing some new docs in XML (catalina/docs/dev/xdocs). The
HTML generation is done with XSL, but the DTD should be the same
as the one
used by Anakia.
I noticed the xdocs directory, but I didn't see anything in there. I sent
Craig
Probably even more... It allows more dummies to install our
software, more
dummies = more bugs found, more bugs found = more fixes, more
fixes = better
software... Or that's right only in f**ked up mind? :)
Pier
+1
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:38:55PM -0700, Si Ly wrote:
I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
anyone about it. It seems to me that outsiders (non-committers)
can't get anything into CVS because the committers are not looking at
the patches, for whatever reasons.
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Si Ly wrote:
I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
anyone about it. It seems to me that outsiders (non-committers)
can't get anything into CVS because the committers are not looking at
the patches, for whatever reasons.
Sorry about that,
The patch is good, if nobody else get to submit it I'll do that when I
return ( and start again on jasper - I just want to make sure the
connector is in good state so we can finally have the beta ).
If Costin agree with the patch, I'll commit them
on 7/3/01 8:04 AM, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:38:55PM -0700, Si Ly wrote:
I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
anyone about it. It seems to me that outsiders (non-committers)
can't get anything into CVS because the
:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS:
[TomcatDocumentation Redactors To Hire]
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Si Ly wrote:
I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
anyone about it. It seems to me that outsiders
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
This is deja vu all over again. We should take one copy if this
discussion (we had the same thing in Commons, and I am sure it happened
everywhere else...), post it somewhere, and people can just submit
article numbers or something rather than typing the same
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
It's just sad when an organization like Apache chooses to ignore existing
standards and invent it's own DTD and transformation language to do the
site.
Once again Costin, you fail to impress me with your statements. You confuse
Apache with some
This is deja vu all over again. We should take one copy if this
discussion (we had the same thing in Commons, and I am sure it happened
everywhere else...), post it somewhere, and people can just submit
article numbers or something rather than typing the same arguments over
and over.
Yes, I
Brad Cox wrote:
At 10:09 AM -0400 7/2/01, Rob S. wrote:
1) Developers don't write them in lieu of coding.
2) Users don't read them
3...) ?
http://www.c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki has a novel way of getting at the
problem. Not a panacea obviously, but what is? The one at that
address is
Geir Magnusson Jr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Documentation is just as valuable as the software...
Probably even more... It allows more dummies to install our software, more
dummies = more bugs found, more bugs found = more fixes, more fixes = better
software... Or that's right only in
21 matches
Mail list logo
