RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > Can't believe it! > > We have a race condition beetwen the: > Alias /examples /tomcat/webapps/examples > and > JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 > > If I comment out the Alias directive there is no more colision, and if I > slow down the map_uri_to_worker putting th

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:39 > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Cc: 'GOMEZ Henri' > Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > > > > > -Original

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:26 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Cc: GOMEZ Henri > Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > > I'm not sure I understand how request_rec

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > > We have a serious problem with jk and apache2. > Try running: > ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp > > I have 59 > [Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler > "jakarta-servlet" not found for: date.j

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>No the implementation is inside the Apache's mod_jk, so the apr is >allready there. You'll wrap map_uri_to_workers calls by apr_thread_mutex ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> I've no problem using APR for Apache 2.0, but since > map_uri_to_worker is common code, having #idef HAS_APR may > not be the perfect solution. No the implementation is inside the Apache's mod_jk, so the apr is allready there. I'll use apr_thread_mutex, and commit that. MT. -- To unsubs

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>We have a serious problem with jk and apache2. >Try running: >ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp > >I have 59 >[Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler >"jakarta-servlet" not found for: date.jsp > >Now, IMHO there is problem with map_uri_to_wo

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

We have a serious problem with jk and apache2. Try running: ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp I have 59 [Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler "jakarta-servlet" not found for: date.jsp Now, IMHO there is problem with map_uri_to_worker, ca

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL >>> >>>;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? >> >> >> Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ? > >I have retested it with TC4. Could you give me more details about how you get : cipher_suite: key_size: ssl_ses

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:39 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > >GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open >> and could be fixed quickly ... >> >> >>>And

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open > and could be fixed quickly ... > > >>And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well >>i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, >>they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open and could be fixed quickly ... >And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well >i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, >they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to >the AJP13 implement

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 15 de junio de 2002 5:50 > In TC33, there are for i_rdr: > 8297 Blo inetinfo.exe error ; Also no resource found (error 404) > 5411 NorJSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 > Thanks Bill, lost them, marked as INVA

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

- Original Message - From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:06 PM Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57 > > > OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 > > (after all I asked for this release) > > I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57 > OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 > (after all I asked for this release) ;) Thanks for volunteering !!! I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :).. And i doubt that they

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

There are several bugs related to auth, I'll take a look. We must have all the bugs evaluated ( even with LATER ) before a formal release. > OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 > (after all I asked for this release) Great, thanks for volunteering ! ( we should also start looking for a

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) I'll check all open bugs in bugzilla and sort what are revelants to jk 1.2.0 and what to 2.0.0. Since mod_jk (and jtc) are now revelants to both tomcat3/tomcat4, what about creating a jtc entry in bugzilla to have al

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > Adding the JNI problem reported by myself, could this be the list of > actual open bugs against JK1.2.0? > > If yes, first task done...next please.. :) Review the bugs is the next step, and mark which ones we have to fix and which we postpone f

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 22:01 > No, we need a benevolent worker :-) Just realized i was falling in my habitual naiveness.. :) The tasklist of the RM starts with "collect open bugs", ok? We have the bugs reported by the query below in

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If > > someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, > > and if this is listed I'll fix it. > > The silence can be masked :) > > Could we do some kind of collective RM

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 18:46 > Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the > jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with > modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). > OK, i was only pointing to some problem i k

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

TECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:28 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > > >> Hum, what's should do the release manager ? > > > >Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what >

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>> Hum, what's should do the release manager ? > >Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what >bugs must be >fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements. May be we could team-up with Larry ? >And of course, make sure the stars are in the right position a

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > >Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If > >someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, > >and if this is listed I'll fix it. > > Hum, what's should do the release manager ? Build the 'official' release, rev

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>> >I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 >> >test hang tomcat AFAIK. >> >> Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? > >Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the >jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with >modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). > >This

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 > >test hang tomcat AFAIK. > > Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with modjk

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 >test hang tomcat AFAIK. Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? >we need some time to test jk 1.2 under IIS.. You're the boss here ;) >AFAIK there is some problems with file names, the given reg >file, docs and binaries has different n

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

> De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 16:11 > Did there is still opened bugs in mod_jk 1.2.0 (jtc/native) > which could prevent us to make a release ? I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang tomcat AFAIK. we need some time to

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

.. PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:20 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? > > >>+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. I

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my >systems for a really long time now. > >Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used >with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? > >To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my systems for a really long time now. Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 and mod

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>>I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again >>>with more tests. >> >>I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a >>Fujitsu compiler, >>Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug). >>+++ >>error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init() >>uri:/jks

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>> I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again >> with more tests. > >I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a >Fujitsu compiler, >Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug). >+++ >error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init() >uri:/jkstatus/* host >=(null) ur

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >>>I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and >>>very little time). >> >>>If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? >> >>no >> >>--- >> >>jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk >>jk 1.2 = jtc/native >>jk 2.0 = jt

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and > >very little time). > > >If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? > > no > > --- > > jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk > jk 1.2 = jtc/native > jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2 And jk1.0 = tomcat3.

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? > > If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, > and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there > platforms. +1 ! The recent bug report about 'deadlock' turned

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

>I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and >very little time). >If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? no --- jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk jk 1.2 = jtc/native jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-ma

Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time). If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? > > If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, > and ask contribute

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

Yes it could be a good idea because I can't have access to the CVS repository to generate a newer release of mod_jk under AIX 4.3.3. Thx -Message d'origine- De: GOMEZ Henri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: lundi 10 juin 2002 15:26 A: Tomcat Developers List Objet: jk 1.2 freese