Pb with Tomcat 3.3 - Class not found: TOMCAT/JSP...

2004-08-05 Thread NGOR Eric
Hi , Sorry to bother you all but I have a problem when I changed my Tomcat 4.0 to 3.3 It seems that this problem has been resolved before, but I can't find the answer. I have the exception : Class not found: TOMCAT/JSP/.../myJsp.jsp Status code:404 request:R( /mi0101_mnt +

Tomcat 3.3 mod_jk2

2003-05-31 Thread David Cassidy
Has anyone managed to get tomcat 3.3.1a to work with mod_jk2 and if so how ? Thanks David -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy

Misspelled item in tomcat 3.3.x

2003-01-23 Thread Jeff Tulley
Has anybody ever pointed out that the EmbededTomcat.java of Tomcat 3.3.x is mispelled? Is this something that should be fixed? I can submit a patch, if so. :) Maybe at least the debug messages, since those are visible to the users. Actually, it looks like this misspelling has been carried

Configuring TOMCAT 3.3 with IIS 4.0

2002-10-14 Thread Moises Bezerra Menezes
Hi, I am having problems trying to configure TOMCAT 3.3 to work with IIS 4.0, via isapi_redirect.dll When I am doing an upload of a file larger than 100Mbytes I get an 'out of memory' error. I already tried to set the parameters cmd_line= -Xmx256m -Xss64k to the file wrapper.properties. If I

Tomcat 3.3 repository changes

2002-09-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Now that we have mod_jk present on JTC, what about removing it from TC 3.3.2 CVS ? Also is it planned to remove util and use only the one present in JTC ? From build/gump it seems that util from JTC will be used but -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Tomcat 3.3 repository changes

2002-09-13 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 19:46, Henri Gomez wrote: Now that we have mod_jk present on JTC, what about removing it from TC 3.3.2 CVS ? +1 Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tomcat 3.3 repository changes

2002-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 5:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 3.3 repository changes Now that we have mod_jk present on JTC, what about removing it from TC 3.3.2 CVS ? Also is it planned to remove util

Re: Duplicate Contexts in reloading. Probably a sync bug in Tomcat 3.3.

2002-08-21 Thread Bill Barker
bug in Tomcat 3.3. Hi, If two requests enter ReloadInterceptor.contextMap() simultaneously and both reload context, it causes duplicate context reloading. -- messages -- 2002-08-19 16:15:16 - ContextManager: Removing context DEFAULT:/examples 2002-08-19 16:15:16

Duplicate Contexts in reloading. Probably a sync bug in Tomcat 3.3.

2002-08-19 Thread Hugh J. L.
Hi, If two requests enter ReloadInterceptor.contextMap() simultaneously and both reload context, it causes duplicate context reloading. -- messages -- 2002-08-19 16:15:16 - ContextManager: Removing context DEFAULT:/examples 2002-08-19 16:15:16 - ContextManager: Removing

Question about Session in Tomcat 3.3

2002-08-12 Thread Hugh J. L.
As I tested, when context reloads in Tomcat 3.3.1, e.g. caused by modification of servlet class, sessions are lost. Is it true for all Tomcat 3.3.x? Is there any switch in source code which can change this behavior and maintain sessions through context reloading? Thanks for your help. Hugh

Question about Session in Tomcat 3.3 -- continued...

2002-08-12 Thread Hugh J. L.
I changed switch fullReload in ReloadInterceptor from true to false, and sessions are maintained through context reloading. (Of course, because the old context remains.) Is there any disadvantage if I set this way? Anyway fullReload=true is default setting. Thanks. Hugh

Re: Question about Session in Tomcat 3.3 -- continued...

2002-08-12 Thread Bill Barker
List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:50 AM Subject: Question about Session in Tomcat 3.3 -- continued... I changed switch fullReload in ReloadInterceptor from true to false, and sessions are maintained through context reloading. (Of course, because the old context remains

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-06-15 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5411 JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-30 Thread GOMEZ Henri
On the java side ? I think we should just use commons-logging, and the admin/ or manager/ or some other ( java-based code ) to control the underlying logger ( which should probably default to log4j when somebody has the time to do this ). commons-logging seems a good way to hide log4j or

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-30 Thread GOMEZ Henri
](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:40 AM To: Tomcat Dev List Subject: RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1 This works

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-30 Thread GOMEZ Henri
And surprise!!, 3.3 it's suppoussed to have another logrotate inside, broken, but the code is there.. just need that someones have spare cycles to fix it.. I started take a look a log stuff in 3.3.2 and will see how to fix the logrotate support or better add log4j support ? -- To unsubscribe,

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-30 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Whaou. Didn't now about copytruncate option of logrotate. It has some downsides too. But it's documented in the manual page, so everyone should know what to expect. Under Linux there is truncate and ftruncate calls but I wonder how it works

logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, Did there is plan to help implement logrotate for Tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1 ? On production the logs could became very important after weeks of use and should be cleanup. The usual way under Unix is to use logrotate which generally send a KILL -HUP/USR1 to the process which in turn close

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread Jason Corley
I don't really know much about log4j, so I can't comment on that particular methodology, but I'd been looking at implementing a logrotate for tomcat on my systems. I was thinking something like this for tomcat 3.3 (haven't looked at 4.x yet): /var/log/tomcat3/jasper-*.log /var/log/tomcat3

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I don't really know much about log4j, so I can't comment on that particular methodology, but I'd been looking at implementing a logrotate for tomcat on my systems. I was thinking something like this for tomcat 3.3 (haven't looked at 4.x yet): /var/log/tomcat3/jasper-*.log /var/log/tomcat3

Re: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
there is plan to help implement logrotate for Tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1 ? On production the logs could became very important after weeks of use and should be cleanup. The usual way under Unix is to use logrotate which generally send a KILL -HUP/USR1 to the process which in turn close its open logs files

Re: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, Did there is plan to help implement logrotate for Tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1 ? On production the logs could became very important after weeks of use and should be cleanup. The usual way under Unix is to use logrotate which generally send

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
that those are not open by the JVM process... Therefore the best course of action is doing like catalina does... Which already has a some-sort of logrotate built in... And surprise!!, 3.3 it's suppoussed to have another logrotate inside, broken, but the code is there.. just need that

Re: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that those are not open by the JVM process... Therefore the best course of action is doing like catalina does... Which already has a some-sort of logrotate built in... And surprise!!, 3.3 it's suppoussed to have another logrotate inside,

RE: logrotate and tomcat 3.3/4.0/4.1

2002-04-29 Thread Bojan Smojver
This works (TC 3.3.x): /var/tomcat/logs/*.log { copytruncate weekly rotate 52 compress missingok } Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5411 JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5411 JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

Calling code from native library - tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0.1

2002-03-18 Thread Harald Wehr
I build a shared library (mapserver) which functions i can use in java. Using this library within a normal jdk1.4 works without problems. Calling functions using Tomcat 3.3a works well too. No problems occur. Using Tomcat 4.0.1/4.0.3 the server crashes with error messages attached to this

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to specify -Dprop=value in Tomcat's startup. If it does, I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml Http10Connector port=${http.port} ... / and included

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-08 Thread Vincent Massol
Ok. Thanks Costin. What I'll keep in mind is that it is complex ... ;-) -Vincent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 00:28 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:31:44 +0100 From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line I don't know

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I'm wondering whether we really need to build it in to Tomcat itself, though. Can't you accomplish the same thing by using a little Ant script and run a filter or replace task? All this would require is packaging ant.jar along with Tomcat, or requiring users that need the facility to download

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:10:57 +0100 From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line I'm wondering whether

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread costinm
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: target name=generate description=Generate customized server.xml replace file=server.xml token=@port@ value=${port} /target /project In your template server.xml, you'd have a Connector element like this: Connector ...

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
There's a lot of power in what the replace task can do. Here's a very simple one that replaces the string @port@ with the port number specified by the port property: project name=Create server.xml default=generate target name=generate description=Generate customized server.xml

Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, You should all know that there is a very good Tomcat 3.3/4.0 plugin for the OSS IDE eclipse (www.eclipse.org), available at http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/. This plugin allow eclipse developper to launch Tomcat from the IDE, stop, restart and configure many parameters like tomcat_home

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
=8080 in the startup command to make server.xml runtime configurable. Would this approach work for you? If so, perhaps it would desirable to add this feature to Tomcat 4.x. Unfortunately the parameter substitution is broken in Tomcat 3.3 so you would need 3.3.1 to try this out. Cheers, Larry

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
the parameter substitution is broken in Tomcat 3.3 so you would need 3.3.1 to try this out. Where could I take more information on these feature in 3.3.1 ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
]] Sent: 05 February 2002 19:46 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: I looked for this and didn't find that there was any POST data sent and none was read. I certainly could have missed something. I don't completely

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
Costin, See inline -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 19:08 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the time it happens when something

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
It is described in the Variable substitution section near the top of the serverxml.html document. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/serverxml.html Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:53 AM

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:09 AM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue Sorry guys for not jumping in earlier. Here is some more information on how Cactus works and what it does. Background info

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 14:16 To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue For the testPostMethod test, can you point me to where in Cactus, the POST data is added/generated and where

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
where POST data is added as part of the client handling for this test? Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:15 AM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue -Original

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
(queryString.toString()); out.close(); -Vincent -Original Message- From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:43 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue Thanks for the info. However, I never found where testPostMethod was using any

Re: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:28:01 +0100 From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line Hi to all, You should all

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread costinm
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: The particularity of testPostMethod is that it sends information both in the URL (as parameters) and in the request BODY in POST form. Thus, there is some POST data sent ! Ok, then what really matters is who reads the body and how. Sorry for not

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:40:21 -0500 From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line I don't know

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
It appears, for example, that the only thing you can override about a connector is which port it's on. What happens if you want to override, say, the maximum number of connections that your connector will accept (the maxProcessors parameter on Tomcat 4's HttpConnector)? Right +1 for you here

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:06 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: The particularity of testPostMethod is that it sends

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Bill Barker
9:05 AM Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: The particularity of testPostMethod is that it sends information both in the URL (as parameters) and in the request BODY in POST form. Thus, there is some POST data sent ! Ok, then what really

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
both in the URL _and_ in the body as POST data ? Thanks a lot -Vincent -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 21:38 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue I've found an XP machine to try this on, and can

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Larry Isaacs
Many thanks for finding this. Not suprisingly Costin's initial guess was correct. Fortunately I wasn't wrong about one assumption, which was the reason for the failure was that Tomcat 3.3 was too fast. Thanks again, to Costin. I'll see about moving the yielding logic tonight and then tag

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread costinm
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: Are you saying that the logic in Tomcat is that prior to closing a socket, all data is read first ? No, tomcat will just try to flush it's input buffers. We don't want to read all data - the servlet is supposed to process the request and decide if it

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Bill Barker
See inline. - Original Message - From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:57 PM Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue Hey thanks guys ! You're too fast for me ... I'm trying to catch up with the emails

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread costinm
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: Many thanks for finding this. Not suprisingly Costin's initial guess was correct. Fortunately I wasn't wrong about one assumption, which was the reason for the failure was that Tomcat 3.3 was too fast. Thanks again, to Costin. Well, given

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread Vincent Massol
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 22:47 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: Many thanks for finding this. Not suprisingly Costin's initial guess was correct. Fortunately I wasn't

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-07 Thread costinm
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: Last thing I'd like to confirm : When data is sent over a socket, it will fill the socket buffer (at the client side) and then sending of data will block until the server side reads from the socket buffer ? If The first part - I'm not sure. I expect

Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi Bill, Here are the details of the problem with Tomcat 3.3 and Cactus. Apparently, Cactus's sample test suite run against Tomcat 3.3 will occasionally fail on the main Gump system (a 300Mhz system running Linux) and reliably fails Vincent Massol's laptop (1Gig+ system running Windows XP

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread costinm
with Tomcat 3.3 and Cactus. Apparently, Cactus's sample test suite run against Tomcat 3.3 will occasionally fail on the main Gump system (a 300Mhz system running Linux) and reliably fails Vincent Massol's laptop (1Gig+ system running Windows XP). The failure is the same for both

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Larry Isaacs
Comments below. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:45 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue Hi Larry, We had a similar problem long time ago - with the POST and the extra

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread costinm
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the time it happens when something is still in the write buffer ( i.e. unsent or unread ), and the remote side is closing the connection. I'll try again: Assuming CLIENT sending data to SERVER. The exception happens when: - server has

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Larry Isaacs
Vincent: is your test servlet reading the body i.e. calls getParameters() if it's a url-encoded body, or read the full stream ? If not, I believe the current behavior is correct and shouldn't be changed - it signals the CLIENT that whatever it posted was not read, and that's a very

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Vincent Massol
Larry, See below. -Original Message- From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 19:03 To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue Comments below. [snip] Let me know if that helps - and if not what's the easiest way

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread costinm
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: I looked for this and didn't find that there was any POST data sent and none was read. I certainly could have missed something. I don't completely understand everything that Cactus' controller servlet does on the Tomcat side. However, I think I

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:46 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: One question - with the sleep(), do you do an isAvailable

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread Larry Isaacs
- From: Larry Isaacs Sent: Tue 2/5/2002 2:56 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Cc: Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:46 PM To: Tomcat Developers

RE: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

2002-02-05 Thread costinm
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: I tried adding a Thread.sleep(1) just before the call to TcpConnection.shutdownInput() in Http10Interceptor. A System.out.println() within shutdownInput's while never prints during a successful Cactus run on Win2k. Is there anything different I should

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4600] - Tomcat 3.3 redirect behavior differs from Tomcat 3.2

2002-02-04 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=4600 Tomcat 3.3 redirect behavior differs from Tomcat 3.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

FW: Tomcat 3.3 getRemoteHost always returns localHost - Is there any 3.3 production version has patch applied

2002-01-31 Thread Jayakumar Duraisamy
May i know when the production release for this fix is in schedule. Thanks and Regards Jayakumar -Original Message- From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3 getRemoteHost always returns

RE: Tomcat 3.3 getRemoteHost always returns localHost - Is there any 3.3 production version has patch applied

2002-01-31 Thread Larry Isaacs
See my reply on tomcat-user. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Jayakumar Duraisamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Tomcat 3.3 getRemoteHost always returns localHost - Is there any 3.3 production version

RE: Strange Tomcat 3.3 error

2002-01-30 Thread Larry Isaacs
..., or perhaps a taglib TLD file, would cause something like this. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Renato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange Tomcat 3.3 error Hi all, Sometimes, when I

Strange Tomcat 3.3 error

2002-01-30 Thread Renato
Hi all, Sometimes, when I start my Tomcat 3.3 + Apache ( nightly build 0 I have the following error: . /web.xml - java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Connection timed out at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-01-23 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5411 JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Threads problem with Apache 1.3.22 + Tomcat 3.3 + Cocoon 1.8.2 on a Solaris x86 2.8 box (with Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.2_05a, native threads, sunwjit))

2002-01-16 Thread Roman Medina
Hi ppl: I'm running Apache 1.3.22 + Tomcat 3.3 + Cocoon 1.8.2 on a Solaris x86 2.8 box (with Sun JDK 1.2), and I'm in trouble. When I thought all was working ok I realized that with some applications my Tomcat crashes!! This happens after receiving several errors (see attached log). Any help

Re: Threads problem with Apache 1.3.22 + Tomcat 3.3 + Cocoon 1.8.2 on a Solaris x86 2.8 box (with Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.2_05a, native threads, sunwjit))

2002-01-16 Thread Bojan Smojver
Medina wrote: Hi ppl: I'm running Apache 1.3.22 + Tomcat 3.3 + Cocoon 1.8.2 on a Solaris x86 2.8 box (with Sun JDK 1.2), and I'm in trouble. When I thought all was working ok I realized that with some applications my Tomcat crashes!! This happens after receiving several errors (see attached

I can't run Tomcat 3.3 with SSL

2002-01-15 Thread Mihail
Hello. I can't run Tomcat 3.3 with SSL on Red Hat Linux 7.0 I make key with keytool, then add Http10Connector port=8443 secure=true keystore=/var/tomcat/conf/keystore keypass=mynewpass clientAuth=false / in server.xml Then I start tomcat. And he doesn't work! -- Best

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.3 updated to deal with DOS vulnerability on Windows

2002-01-14 Thread Larry Isaacs
A denial-of-service vulnerability was recently discovered affecting Tomcat 3.3 running on Windows systems. A special HTTP request can cause the request to hang and never complete. This prevents the thread handling the request from handling any further requests until Tomcat is restarted. Other

RE: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomca t 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-10 Thread Larry Isaacs
I still plan to release the jakarta-tomcat HEAD as 3.3.1. 3.3a will be the original 3.3 source with just enough changes to avoid the DOS problem. This is for those who require a validated version of Tomcat 3.3 and can't just switch to a new version. Hopefully the minimal changes will make

Re: RE: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomca t 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-10 Thread Bojan Smojver
Sounds very good to me. Thanks. Bojan Larry Isaacs wrote: I still plan to release the jakarta-tomcat HEAD as 3.3.1. 3.3a will be the original 3.3 source with just enough changes to avoid the DOS problem. This is for those who require a validated version of Tomcat 3.3 and can't just switch

RE: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-10 Thread GOMEZ Henri
to have for Tomcat 3.3 a faster release rate than it was for 3.2, since everybody agree that 3.3.1 is just 3.3 + bug fixes and that added features (SSLSessionID/STM) could (should) be desactivated in default configuration. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3.3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread Larry Isaacs
rather not leave Tomcat 3.3 with the aux.jsp DOS problem for that duration. I propose to add to the site an updated tomcat_util.jar and tomcat_modules.jar that fix the problem based the changes used in Tomcat 3.3.1. The updated source files would be made available as well on the site. Following

Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat3. 3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread cmanolache
things quickly is not my forte and the earliest I could do a 3.3.1-beta1 would be the following weekend, i.e. the weekend of the 20th. In addition, I would rather not leave Tomcat 3.3 with the aux.jsp DOS problem for that duration. I propose to add to the site an updated tomcat_util.jar

Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread Bojan Smojver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the changes in 3.3 tree were only bug fixes and what I've seen so far was pretty clear and simple - I think the head of 3.3 is as good or better than 3.3.0. There were a few new features as well (at least STM pooling and SSLSessionID checks), but they should

RE: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread Larry Isaacs
it won't be possible to fetch the patched 3.3 from CVS using a tag or branch, I'm reluctant to give it a normal version number. 3.3a seems like a reasonable alternative. I'll provide full tar.gzs and zips in addition to jars to update an existing Tomcat 3.3 installation. Cheers, Larry -Original

Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:26 PM Subject: Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the changes

Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 aux.jsp DOS problem and a Tomca t 3. 3.1 release

2002-01-09 Thread Bojan Smojver
Larry Isaacs wrote: Since it won't be possible to fetch the patched 3.3 from CVS using a tag or branch, I'm reluctant to give it a normal version number. 3.3a seems like a reasonable alternative. I'll provide full tar.gzs and zips in addition to jars to update an existing Tomcat 3.3

Difference in the Request class between Tomcat 3.2 and Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-19 Thread Renato
Hi all, What happened to methods getRemoteAddr, getServerName, getServletPath in the Request class for Tomcat 3.3 ? I had an Interceptor written for Tomcat 3.2 that uses these methods within the Request. How can I access internal servlet information from Request int Tomcat 3.3 ? Thanks

Re: Difference in the Request class between Tomcat 3.2 and Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-19 Thread Renato
Just found it... they change names... ( silly me :)) ) On Wed Dec 19 11:54:57 2001, Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu : Hi all, What happened to methods getRemoteAddr, getServerName, getServletPath in the Request class for Tomcat 3.3 ? I had an Interceptor written for Tomcat 3.2

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-19 Thread timothy
Message - From: Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:27 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem Hi all, I'm investigating this problem and may found something. The html that is pushed to my browser

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
to dig through the code. - Original Message - From: Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:27 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem Hi all, I'm investigating this problem and may found something

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-18 Thread Renato
Hi Bill, Thanks for the help. I found out the problem. It was jikes. I was using jikes in the JspInterceptor and somewhat it wasn't working. Now, I will upgrade all my user base to Tomcat 3.3 :)) Renato. On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:29:24 -0800, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5353] - Characters with accents not displayed correctly in Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-18 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5353 Characters with accents not displayed correctly in Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

Why Tomcat 3.3 runs much faster than 3.2.3?

2001-12-17 Thread Hugh J. L.
As I tested, Tomcat 3.3 runs much faster than 3.2.3 (for both JSP and Servlet requests). What changes are the main factors of this performance improvement? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-14 Thread Renato
Hi, This is what I'm using: %@ page contentType=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 % I saw the servlet generated in the work directory and it actually write the response.setContentType(text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1) ( default type in server.xml is set to ISO-8859-1 too ) How can I know the

Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-14 Thread Renato
Hi all, I have one last problem that prevents me from upgrading a big user base from Tomcat 3.2.4 to Tomcat 3.3 ( which will be the last nightly build ). *** HTML pages with latin characters don't display correctly on Linux *** ( JSP file with: ) Ex: páéíóú/p I'm not quite sure if it's

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-14 Thread costinm
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Renato wrote: *** HTML pages with latin characters don't display correctly on Linux *** ( JSP file with: ) Ex: páéíóú/p It's maybe a problem with the locale variables on my Linux, which I don't quite understand ( tried LC_ALL, LANG, LC_CTYPE and it didn't work ) or

RE: PATCH: Fix I18N problems in Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
in Tomcat 3.3 Dear Tomcat 3.3 committers, The atached two patches resolve character corruption problems when Tomcat 3.3 lists directories or displays an error message in non-ISO-8859-1 environments. And I created Japanese resource bundles for Tomcat 3.3 according to Henri Gomez's advice (Note

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] New: - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-13 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5411 JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 Summary: JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Final Platform: PC URL: http://www.warf.ws/admin/ OS/Version: Windows NT/2K

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5353] - Characters with accents not displayed correctly in Tomcat 3.3

2001-12-12 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=5353 Characters with accents not displayed correctly in Tomcat 3.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

  1   2   3   4   >