Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Yep, this is a problem. And, as I said, we don't have keystores, so even if it did pick up the new cert it still wouldn't work for us. jean-frederic clere wrote: OK I have added a new CA using: +++ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> $JAVA_HOME/bin/keytool -import -trustcacerts -file ~/CERTS/demoCA/cacert.

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Chad La Joie wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Chad La Joie wrote: Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Chad La Joie wrote: > >> Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, >> however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it >> provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client >> cert, putting it in a sta

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Chad La Joie wrote: Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application to

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application to do the verification f

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Chad La Joie wrote: Hey guys, I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list. BTW: mod-ssl says: +++ In practice only levels none and require are really interesting, because level optional doesn't work with all browsers and level

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Chad La Joie wrote: Hey guys, I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list. Have you tried to use keystoreType="PKCS12" in the connector? Chad La Joie wrote: Good Morning, I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and we'

{TOML#001-926-078}Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Dear Customer, Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you shortly. Assuring you of our best services always. Warm Regards, Customer Relations TimesofMoney.com A Times Group Com

{TOML#001-926-076}Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Dear Customer, Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you shortly. Assuring you of our best services always. Warm Regards, Customer Relations TimesofMoney.com A Times Group Com

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Hey guys, I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list. Chad La Joie wrote: > Good Morning, > I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and we've run in to an > issue with client cert authentication in a stand alone Tomcat > env

Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

Good Morning, I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and we've run in to an issue with client cert authentication in a stand alone Tomcat environment (i.e. without Apache HTTPD in front of it). Shibboleth clients use client cert auth when talking with the Shibboleth server, however, the cert

feature request

his way my catalina_home home would be "fresh" for everyone, and i can keep my custome extension classes as a group on the catalina_base directory - much easier for managing. ps: is there a "feature request" for t

Feature request - context as a vhost and a sub-dir

Hi, Would it be possible for contexts to exist as a vhost (cntxt.domain.ext) and a sub-dir (www.domain.ext/cntxt) at the same time? Greetings, deacon Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Feature Request

On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Jon Stevens wrote: > What would be "nice to have" is a feature where the Tomcat HTTPd had the > mod_rewrite module implemented within Java. The issue being that on a live > site, I use mod_rewrite to make the URL's pretty or different (or both) and > I would want to have the

Re: Feature Request

on 12/29/2000 4:29 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I (a guy whom still committed nothing) would like very much to have such > feature. > > For our development environment would be fine since it is convenient for > us to have Tomcat in many non programmer workstations ('cause of J

RE: Feature Request

ng in windows than Apache + Tomcat. So, I agree with Jon on this one. I guess he is not a (complete) asshole. =;o) Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 00:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Feature Request

on 12/28/2000 5:28 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apache mod_rewrite is very cool, it comes in handy at times. > Your feature request didn't contain much justifiying why it was needed. > I'm sure you have your reasons, go for it. I thought

Re: Feature Request

er people to take something like > Scarab and run with it without having to also install Apache and make it > connect to Tomcat. > > love and kisses. > > -jon Apache mod_rewrite is very cool, it comes in handy at times. Your feature request didn't contain much justifiyi

Re: Feature Request

Is this not already an action item for catalina?? (RewriteValve) Dave --- Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This would be way down on my list of priorities > for a Jakarta project. > > It doesn't have to be a Jak

Re: Feature Request

on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project. It doesn't have to be a Jakarta Project. I never suggested that. > If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local > development syst

Re: Feature Request

This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project. If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local development system. Why "reinvent the wheel" just for testing. Besides, I would still want to test the stuff developed locally on Apache with mod_rewr

Feature Request

Ok, I'm just throwing this out there as a "nice to have" in the future and maybe someone (how about all those people who haven't commit anything, yet they have time to tell me what an asshole I am) might want to implement it. What would be "nice to have" is a feature where the Tomcat HTTPd had th