Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: > What do you plan to use to do the real-time monitoring ? > > Threads embedded in Apache 2.0 or will Apache 2.0 > execing daemon/service monitors which in turn launch > and monitor the JVM ? The solution must work for apache1.3 and other single-threaded and multiprocess serv

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-11 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > >>"Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>- starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not >>>implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features >>>from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It see

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-11 Thread Henri Gomez
Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 11/10/02 3:14, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes >>>approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start... >> >>OUCH. > >

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP pages to compile (you never know), 20 > servlets loaded on startup, 4 lucene indexes to open, 500 connections to the > database, 350/400 megabytes of "cached" objects to de-serialize and put down > into memory, and

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 11/10/02 3:14, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes >> approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start... > > OUCH. Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes > approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start... OUCH. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://stud

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/10/02 20:21, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 'feature' is that all tomcat processes ( and you may run more than > one in a load balanced mode ) can be started automatically and monitored. > If one dies, it'll be automatically restarted. http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.ht

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Costin Manolache
Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> - starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not >> implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features >> from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit >> of code - a

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not > implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features > from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit > of code - as I mentioned from reading it I

jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Costin Manolache
As I mentioned, there's a lot of duplication - and likely we'll see more. I don't see this as a major problem - duplication is sometimes good. It would be however nice to have similar behavior when possible and make sure we pick each other's fixes. The areas of duplication: - starting and embed