[Patch] Tomcat 3.2.2

2001-04-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gentlefolk, on the Apache side we ran into a headache on Win2K. Windows services introduced a SHUTDOWN event with a new signal. Unfortuantely, they did _not_ continue to support the STOP event from NT. This patch teaches the jk_nt_service to solicit and respect the SHUTDOWN event as well as

Re: Question version 1.1

2001-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Michael G. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:19 PM See Question version 1.0! Is version 3.2.2 beta 5 the latest? or is Tomcat 4(4.4) the latest? What is the latest version? I'll try to answer this, and be resoundingly corrected, or if folks are silent you can

Re: Problems with APR under Linux...

2001-05-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:51 PM kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for apache 1.3, i'd think you'd want to use apr without threads. but i could be wrong... for what it's worth, a while ago i tried using a multithreaded library in

Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

2003-06-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:47 AM 6/27/2003, Mark J Cox wrote: For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

2004-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy. Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors, the source code can be found under ajp/proxy. That's something of a shame, because we lose the development history importing the

Re: [AJP] proxy status

2004-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:15 PM 8/7/2004, Costin wrote: Now let's see how to get this in Apache2.0... Gonna try to make that happen, if I can somehow merge history (ick) It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in both projects. Since we can't propose Mladen in apache, maybe

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

2004-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The connection pool enables reusing backend connections and was build around apr_reslist. At the moment only the proxy_ajp extensively uses this connection pool, with performance slightly better then mod_jk. I noticed one huge win - unless I'm

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

2004-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: That's something of a shame, because we lose the development history importing the finished effort, and it was further disappointing that you didn't bring across the earlier cvs history so this branch could be brought back

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

2004-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:37 PM 8/11/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote: My plan is to start bringing it into httpd v2.1 from next week, assessing how hard the backports to httpd v2.0 would potentially be. Is the history kept in the tomcat connector tree enough

Re: [AJP] proxy status

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:18 PM 8/11/2004, Costin Manolache wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in both projects. Since we can't propose Mladen in apache, maybe we can convince Graham to join tomcat :-) Can't propose mturk? Why

ASF c:\program files location [was Re: Default Tomcat installation location on Windows]

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Dominik Drzewiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 3:47 PM The default location for Tomcat 5.0 installation on Windows is c:\program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0. On the other hand, win32 Apache 2.0 installer suggests c:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache

Re: Issue and solution with tomcat 5.0.27 service on Windows

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
If java.home points to the JRE, this 'might' point you at a JDK - but it is certainly an unwise choice for those who don't dereference a JRE, buried within a JDK, as JAVA_HOME. Which brings up a good point, you may have to modify the envvars of the SYSTEM (LocalSystem) account, or whichever

Re: [AJP] proxy status

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:19 AM 8/12/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:57 AM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although he's subscribed to all three lists, I'd ask that they go either to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] The history of the discussions is just

Re: tomcat build broken with strange javac error(never seen this one before)

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:20 PM 8/12/2004, Joshua Paul wrote: Stop sending me e-mail. Don't tell us - you subscribed. See the email headers in this message, specifically the List-Unsubscribe: header, and send a blank email to that address. When you subscribed, there was another email that told you how to

Re: New Mod_Proxy - some testing/looking

2004-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib sources there too.) Someone want to take a wack at NormW's observations? At 02:31 AM

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-09-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:25 AM 9/2/2004, Henri Gomez wrote: Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in 2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to Tomcats. Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in future 2.0.x release, since Graham,

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-09-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:59 PM 9/2/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in future 2.0.x release [...] please don't expect them to sympathize when n.x.z - n.x.(z+1) starts breaking things, this undermines the confidence in one

Re: Default Tomcat installation location on Windows

2004-11-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It most certainly should NOT be Apache Group - that's an entity that no longer exists (it's what the folks called themselves before the foundation was formed.) We won't change in on the httpd side until a brand new Apache comes out (e.g. httpd 2.2) but expect we will move it to the Apache

Re: FW: JK 1.2.7 Problem?

2004-12-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 05:51 AM 12/14/2004, Allistair Crossley wrote: Copying in DEV on this JK issue/solution on Mladen's request. The release build worked fine. Seems that the problem is caused by the fact that beta3 binaries are compiled as 'debug' so tolower function is issuing an assertion. I'll make a

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Wait - you mean to tell me instead of converting the hostname once to lower - we are strcasecmp'ing every time? Outch, that hurts. Bill At 09:14 PM 12/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2004/12/16 19:14:56 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/printer connectors.html

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:34 AM 12/20/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funkman 2004/12/20 04:34:03 Modified:xdocs-faq connectors.xml docs/faq connectors.html docs/faq/printer connectors.html Log: Note that jk2 is deprecated and that mod_ajp is coming. Don't we mean

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.7 release has done it's share of work by testing all those new features added. The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL

Re: Default Tomcat installation location on Windows

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I've answered this at least once before. Apache Group is ancient trivia. Apache Software Foundation is the proper name and will even be used in httpd-2.2 once that is released. There hasn't been an Apache Group since early year 2000 when the foundation was created - Tomcat got it right when

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:13 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. That's cool, but the handling of in_addr_t is totally bogus and has been for some time. Some platforms declare struct in_addr_t as a typedef - but others

[Patch, rev 2] Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This is a better patch, it also covers the deprecated code that still exists in the HAVE_APR path. At 01:46 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:13 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. That's

[patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... The patch [for jk and jk2, not that it matters as much] allows anyone to debug and diagnose stack dumps using windbg or any other debugging tool, and (if they add the .pdb files to their installation) to make sense of dr watson logs. It

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:52 AM 12/23/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: That's cool, but the handling of in_addr_t is totally bogus and has been for some time. Some platforms declare struct in_addr_t as a typedef - but others don't. The crossplatform solution is to ignore the typedef and use in_addr_t, but instead, the

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:32 AM 12/23/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: This patch has minimal impact but a ton of benefits... So, it's the /Zi for PDB's and /base:address? Does it mean that we'll need to distribute the pdb files together with .dll's? Oh no! The beauty is, is you can distribute

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Oh no! The beauty is, is you can distribute them separately for anyone who actually cares. OK seems reasonable. I'll create a zip with all *.pdb and *_src.pdb. It's not necessary to distribute *_src.pdb files. It turns out that the compiler .pdb is a different beast than

[patch] native/jk/nt_service updates

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The attached patch fixes the nt_service thunk - for the various API changes which have occured in recent times (jk_map etc.) It gets it building again clean, at least. The only thing I'm not certain - is the -1 arg for timeout really appropriate? If not, is there something better to use? This

Re: [patch] win32 buildfoo.

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:51 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: What we'll need eventually is the same for jk/native/jni Same, but load offset 6A6E for example (leaving 192k of pages for mod_jk) since it must be loaded into the same process. See my native2 jni project. And the attached patch. Happy

still jk2?

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/index.html seems a bit dated. Perhaps add some indication that this is no longer the recommended solution? Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [INTRODUCE] apr-java

2005-01-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Silly Question - doesn't this proposal fit better in the commons project than Tomcat? For that matter, I'm rolling the dice that the apr project itself would entertain the possibilities of supporting jni / xs / c++ wrappers. The reason I suggest this is that we have .pkg and .rpm folks

Re: [ANN] JK 1.2.8 Released

2005-01-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This isn't targetted at Mladen, but just want the participants to understand the ramifications. When the Project votes to release software, it becomes the problem of the Foundation to stand behind it. If you release without following this procedure, you own all of the liability, which is a very

Re: [INTRODUCE] apr-java

2005-01-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:03 PM 1/11/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Silly Question - doesn't this proposal fit better in the commons project than Tomcat? Perhaps, but the guys that are interested in both c and Java live inside J-T-C :). Actually, the converse is true - tomcat-dev is modestly

Lingering jk/native/common/ bugs

2005-01-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Although all serious problems seem cleared up, we do still have invalid early declarations of the following two static modules. No patch, since these are either ment to be static (and should -not- be declared in jk_uri_worker_map.h) or they are ment to be shared, exported functions;

Re: [APR-JAVA] cvs upload

2005-01-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
org.apache.apr... ??? If this is private, and you've suggested it should be, don't you mean org.apache.jakarta.apr... ? Bill At 04:25 AM 1/13/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, You can find the sources at: http://www.apache.org/~mturk/ File is: http://www.apache.org/~mturk/apr-java.tar.gz My

Re: [APR-JAVA] cvs upload

2005-01-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:56 PM 1/13/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: org.apache.apr... ??? If this is private, and you've suggested it should be, don't you mean org.apache.jakarta.apr... ? He he :) I didn't said it should be private to J-T-C nor Jakarta. But the fact is that we don't have OO

Re: [APR-JAVA] cvs upload

2005-01-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:25 AM 1/14/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: To be honest, I don't like where this is going. I think access to native functionality for tomcat is great - and starting with functionality provided by apr is ok. But there is a lot outside apr, and if this becomes 'apr - java

Re: jk connector error on post.

2005-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Hi Ryan, fancy meeting up here :) You don't mention, so I'll confirm - you are using mod_jk 1.2.8 (brand new release)? This sure sounds like the (rather obscure) issues with re-piping body content, and taking a simple guess, if you drop back and force http/1.0 (eliminate chunking) the issue goes

Re: jk connector error on post.

2005-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:50 PM 1/18/2005, Ryan Bloom wrote: Actually, both 1.2.6 and 1.2.8 of mod_jk. What do you mean re-piping body content? I haven't forced http/1.0 yet, I was about to trace through Apache to find the problem. My initial investigation looks like the problem is in Apache somewhere, looks

[patch] jk 1.2.8 Build failure on linux (1 liner)

2005-01-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'm finding that @top_builddir@ isn't resolved when I run ./buildconf / ./configure against apache1.3 apxs, so the libtool isn't resolved. The fix is trivial, use the same fixed top_builddir=.. as all the other /native/ directories used. It still confuses me why, when apxs defined the correct

Bad example (harmful to HP/UX)

2005-01-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Attached is a simple patch to correct the jk_apxs detection macros. In every case we search for .so (.dylib) we should also consider the .sl files our HP/UX friends rely on. BillIndex: jk/support/jk_apxs.m4 === RCS file:

Re: [patch] jk 1.2.8 Build failure on linux (1 liner)

2005-01-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
JFC - you missed something. I'm not speaking of Apache 2.0 ... this is in r.e. Apache 1.3 (native/jk/apache13) :) Bill At 05:38 AM 1/20/2005, jean-frederic clere wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I'm finding that @top_builddir@ isn't resolved when I run ./buildconf / ./configure against

Re: [patch] jk 1.2.8 Build failure on linux (1 liner)

2005-02-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
, or continue to abuse libtool for Apache 1.3 modules? I can offer up either patch later this week. Bill At 07:58 PM 1/27/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: JFC - you missed something. I'm not speaking of Apache 2.0 ... this is in r.e. Apache 1.3 (native/jk/apache13) :) Bill At 05:38 AM 1/20

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:56 PM 2/17/2005, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and removing CRLF :) ]. Big leap forward! Here's a list of all mixed up line endings currently in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ ... The Mismatch'ed files all represent files with

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
encountered CR/LF - one CR found.) At 02:52 PM 2/18/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Here's a list of all mixed up line endings currently in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ ... The Mismatch'ed files all represent files with mixed line endings (some cr/lf, some cr/cr/lf.) Two things

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:43 AM 2/19/2005, Remy Maucherat wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories are considerabily more complex. But it would be good to have line endings straightened out beforehand. I

Re: Changing the Tomcat5 WIN32 service runner

2005-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:31 AM 2/21/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Unlike any other java or java/jni implementations it does not tries to make a java as a service, but rather makes a batch (.bat) file as a service. IIUC, that means; 1. service signals (shutdown etc) aren't recognized by cmd (sh for you linux

Re: Configure list to suitably handle return receipts

2005-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:07 PM 2/22/2005, Rahul P Akolkar wrote: My understanding about Delivery Status Notification (DSN) is that if the sender of the original email requests return receipts, then a DSN compliant mail server (such as the one I use), will do the expected thing and provide that notification. But

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

2005-03-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:01 PM 3/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Bill Barker wrote: It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp code present in CVS ? Well, Gump is still failing to build mod_jk against Apache 2.1.x-dev ;-). Yep, look at the thread at httpd-dev about making 2.1.3 as beta. First,

Re: [VOTE] Propose Jim Jagielski and William A. Rowe as JakartaTomcatConnectors commiters

2005-03-14 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:09 PM 3/14/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: +1 for both of all. Should I understand they will works more on HTTPD related stuff and of course JK ?-) Yep, that's my intent :) Yes - I'm also interested in the AJP 14 implementation from the p.o.v. of ASP.NET backends.

Re: [VOTE] Release JK 1.2.9 as stable

2005-03-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:55 AM 3/29/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, There has been some improvements since 1.2.9 beta version, so I suggest that you test the latest source code and binaries. I was under the impression that it was evens-stable, odds-devel. So is this a vote for 1.2.10? In any case I'll check win32

CVS issue?

2005-03-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
cvs up ? native/apache-1.3/Release ? native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.plg cvs update: nothing known about xdocs/common/ajpv13.xml did someone hork xdocs/common/ajpv13.xml in the cvs repository, rather than cvs remove it? Bill - To

Re: [ANN] JK 1.2.10 Released

2005-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:34 AM 3/31/2005, Henri Gomez wrote: 1.2.10, I awaited a 1.2.9 final release. We just add a 1.2.9 beta Kurt and Henri voted yes. I'd presume Mladen's vote was +1 too. Glenn didn't vote yes, he reserved his vote for stress testing. Mladen, could you please slow down long enough to give

OT: Re: Error

2005-04-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Wow, social engineering on a whole new level. An enigma wrapped in a puzzle, wrapped in a riddle. At 01:26 PM 4/13/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; name=warning1.txt Content-Disposition: inline; filename=warning1.txt Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0

Re: mod_jk 1.2.10 - return code when Tomcat not running

2005-04-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:04 PM 4/18/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: This is bug, and will be fixed. It should return SERVER_BUSY (503) if can not connect to Tomcat. You can try to use the load balancer with the single worker, and it should work like explained. It depends; Connection refused == 503

Re: JK Releasing 1.2.11/1.2.12

2005-04-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:38 AM 4/25/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Peter Rossbach wrote: that is a very shot time period for testing. Well, some of the things are really critical, so that's the reason. I think that 1.2.8/1.2.9 proved that haste creates this churn. Once 1.2.11 is ready, isn't it sufficient to point

Re: JK Releasing 1.2.11/1.2.12

2005-04-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:01 AM 4/26/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: I wish to make the 1.2.11 as a bugfix release, so where's the churn in that? Nothing, 1.2.11 is wonderful. You proposed releasing 1.2.12/stable a few days afterwards. I don't know if calling 1.2.12/stable in a few days is really such a hot idea.

Re: JK Releasing 1.2.11/1.2.12

2005-04-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:35 AM 4/26/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Well, I agree with you that we create a new branch. I wish to deprecate ajp12, jni and ajp14 connectors, as well as isapi, domino and ntservice servers. Reasons: ... ntservice: unmaintained for years. I've used ntservice for years, never had an issue,

Re: JK Releasing 1.2.11/1.2.12

2005-04-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:48 AM 4/26/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote The effort might better be spent after conversion to svn, since you attain the ability to have versioned rmdir, without hacking up the raw CVS tree and breaking historical checkouts. Hmm, I would like to leave the CVS until

Re: Can't compile jk nativ connector under Suse 9.3

2005-04-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
grep -r SD_SEND /usr/include/* grep -r SD_SEND /usr/local/include/* ? Tell us where it's hidden and it's more likely we can come up with an appropriate patch. Any ./configure output would also be helpful. At 01:01 PM 4/26/2005, Peter Rossbach wrote: I have a jk native compilation problem at

Re: Can't compile jk nativ connector under Suse 9.3

2005-04-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jk_connect.c jk_connect.c: In function `jk_shutdown_socket': jk_connect.c:485: error: `SD_SEND' undeclared (first use in this function) jk_connect.c:485: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once jk_connect.c:485: error: for each function it appears in.) William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb

Re: Can't compile jk nativ connector under Suse 9.3

2005-04-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:32 AM 4/27/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: ... Thank you; but the other half of my question... It was my fault. SD_SEND is defined only on winsock. On other platforms it is 1. Already committed a fix. Why a Win32 fix rather than a proper posix fix? I suspect you were

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/nt_service jk_nt_service.c

2005-04-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:46 AM 4/27/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mturk 2005/04/27 00:46:22 -hEventSource = RegisterEventSource(NULL, Jakrta - Tomcat); +hEventSource = RegisterEventSource(NULL, Jakarta - Tomcat); -sprintf(szMsg, %s error: %d, Jakrta - Tomcat, dwErr); +

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:31 AM 5/6/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning, 10:00 GMT. Any objections? Yes, one. What's the rush? One week

Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.12 Released

2005-05-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:23 AM 5/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, JK 1.2.12 has been released. Question; How? I don't see a vote. It has been tagged and packaged. It is not released unless there is a vote on the PMC I missed [and shouldn't be discussed there anyways.] I would also like to make a stability VOTE

Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.12 Released

2005-05-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:37 PM 5/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It is NOT a release. Sure it is not. That's why there is a VOTE inside, and that's why it was posted only on the dev list. Perhaps I should subject that email as: '1.2.12 tarballs available for testing'. Yes that would have

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:30 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Build and run on NetWare with apache 2.0.54. Woot! And thank you for the example, Jean-Jacques, of exactly why we need more than a few days before we declare 'stable' releases ;-) But I do think it's wonderful that the NetWare issues are gone. What

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 05:08 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: I built and tried mod_jk against 2.0.52 and 2.1-dev. However, in these two cases it was not tested as for 2.0.54. Stress tests were done against Tomcat 4.1.30, validation against 4.1.31. For 1.3.33, I am sorry to admit that I did not build JK and

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:33 AM 5/10/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Interesting is that it was spotted only when the release was made, so this gives one reason more for making some sort of releases and binaries to attract more users to actually do the testing. Agreed that development releases (early and often) are a very

Modifying Win32 default optimizations?

2005-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'd like to modify the Win32 build projects (of mod_jk, and httpd 1.3/2.0/2.1-dev, along with apr); The /O2 optimization option is extremely agressive, unfortunately it produces less than ideal crash traceback information. That is due to the (implicit) /Oy flag, which omits respecible stack

Re: Modifying Win32 default optimizations?

2005-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:46 AM 5/11/2005, Branko ─îibej wrote: All in all - comments? How about moving away from MSVC 6 to (say) VC.Net 2003, while we're at it? It's time, to say the least. Not for 1.3 or 2.0 httpd - you lose some measure of binary compatibility. We can jump through hoops to continue to use the

Re: Modifying Win32 default optimizations?

2005-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:35 PM 5/11/2005, Branko ─îibej wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: If the open source community tends to push back on Microsoft's newest compilers, it's simply because their forced treadmill is the anathema of inclusiveness. That's what's happening right now with Subversion. The Python 2.4

Re: Modifying Win32 default optimizations?

2005-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:29 PM 5/11/2005, Randy Kobes wrote: That sounds great, but one consideration from the point of view of Perl (eg, mod_perl) is that the dominant Win32 Perl binary, from ActiveState, uses VC 6 to compile, and they don't have any plans soon of changing that. But that might change by the next

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Apparently there was something peculiar with the line endings in the previous generation of these files. Here is the patch below, compressed with --ignore-space: Index: mod_jk.dsp === RCS file:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/iis/installer

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 2005/05/12 11:46:22 Modified:jk/native/iis/installer License.rtf Log: Fix the License.rtf after -kb'ing the file (the various \x10 \x11 \x13 all have specific meanings to this format.) Cuts HTTP Server Subcomponents from the license text. If any additional

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/nt_service nt_service.dsp

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 2005/05/12 11:55:09 Modified:jk/native/domino dsapi.dsp jk/native/iis isapi.dsp isapi_redirect.rc isapi_redirect.reg jk/native/iis/installer isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism jk/native/isapi tomcat_redirector.reg

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src shm.c ssl.c

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 2005/05/12 12:28:03 Modified:jni/native libtcnative.dsp libtcnative.dsw tcnative.dsp jni/native/build win32ver.awk jni/native/src shm.c ssl.c Log: Fix more ^M polution, whitespace changes, only. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +218

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 2005/05/12 12:29:47 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java Address.java Log: More ^M polution fixed, whitespace changes only. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +15 -15 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/OS.java Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/howto apache.xml

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 2005/05/12 13:26:59 Modified:jk/native2 CHANGES.txt jk/xdocs/howto apache.xml Log: Last of the ^M bogosity I could uncover. Think that we are ready for a new tarball :) Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +6 -6

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ok, all of the file ^M fixes within jakarta-tomcat-connectors are finished. I added the /Oy- flag as there was unanimous concensus for -that- change. I left out the /Gs0 since legit concerns were raised. Think we are ready for a tarball :) -kb files which should not have been are now -ko.

Re: Graceful restart on Windows [was Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status?]

2005-06-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:44 PM 5/31/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After some more digging, it *appears* that apache -k restart WILL do a graceful restart of Apache2 on Windoze. Of course it will. Can anyone confirm this please? And are there any gotcha's to watch out for? Can someone explain exactly how this

Re: Session Affinity after Graceful Apache restart? [was Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status?]

2005-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:08 PM 6/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: It works of course, but IIRC you are planning to use it for reconfiguring mod_jk. I think you might get into the problems with shared memory (particularly on unix) because some child might have a different idea about shared memory addresses. Oh - so this

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c jk_shm.h jk_status.c

2005-06-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen; are you sure you weren't looking for 'long long', al la int64_t? Falling over to the FPU is rarely the best performance decision. Bill At 02:55 AM 6/13/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mturk 2005/06/13 00:55:51 Modified:jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c jk_shm.h jk_status.c

Re: Tomcat on remote server

2005-06-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:00 AM 6/20/2005, sai krishna wrote: Hello list, Is there no one to really answer my question here?? Nope. You want an appropriate users list, this list is for the development of the Tomcat server. Please review http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html Bill

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native configure.in

2005-06-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:01 AM 6/23/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 2005/06/21 03:31:41 Log: -Wall is only for gcc. That's true. But if your 'cc' doesn't support the -Wall then make CFLASG with some platform switch rather then interfering with 99% of others that are using gcc. The

Re: Releasing JK 1.2.14

2005-06-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
JFC, there's no way you would build against apr-1 for an httpd-2.0 server (and, you must build against apr-1 for an httpd-2.1/2.2 server.) You forgot to mention how you configured. The very first release of APR 1.0.0 was borked, it deployed apr-config and apu-config, wiping out the 0.9

Re: Releasing JK 1.2.14

2005-07-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Assuming you have apr checked out, apr/build/lineends.pl --cr will convert a tree to cr/lf dos format, and info-zip does a lovely job on Unix of zipping it up. Bill At 12:02 PM 7/6/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Done, the branch is ready. The files are in

Re: Releasing JK 1.2.14

2005-07-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:50 PM 7/6/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Assuming you have apr checked out, apr/build/lineends.pl --cr will convert a tree to cr/lf dos format, and info-zip does a lovely job on Unix of zipping it up. Right, a smarter unix2dos :) Yup :) It has the benefit

Re: [VOTE] SOC temporary committer Anders Nyman

2005-07-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:52 PM 7/11/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: I have developed, and I am developing the majority of the code without being connected to the CVS all the time. It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use the tools of our organization; and it's equally important that we capture the

j-t-c/common/build - j-t-c/jk/support ?

2005-07-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It turns out the common/build macros are only referenced within the jk tree (which is all I check out to build modjk). I'd like to move the apache.m4, get_ver.awk and os_apache.m4 scripts to this new home, preserving history by copying the ,v files, stripping old tags from the new copies and then

Re: [VOTE] SOC temporary committer Anders Nyman

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:25 PM 7/11/2005, you wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's important for students involved with SoC to learn to use the tools of our organization; I don't agree with you. The Tomcat is not place for some 'sandbox' projects. If the ASF have some agreement with Google then it should have

JK 1.2.14 core dump oddity

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Something's not quite right in mod_jk-land. The pertinent httpd.conf is; ErrorDocument 404 /examplestomcat/error.jsp Alias /examplestomcat /local0/test/webapps/examplestomcat JkMount /examplestomcat/*.jsp ajp13 when the 404 causes error.jsp to be returned, the response code is unset from 404

Re: JK 1.2.14 core dump oddity

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It's not the return OK; my bad. Something deeper is going on here, some interaction with Apache 2, having to do with the request_rec status not being bubbled back to the origin error. But if anyone has clues to point me at, I'd appreciate it. At 02:52 PM 7/12/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote

Re: JK 1.2.14 core dump oddity

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:04 PM 7/12/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's not the return OK; my bad. Something deeper is going on here, some interaction with Apache 2, having to do with the request_rec status not being bubbled back to the origin error. But if anyone has clues to point me at, I'd appreciate

Re: [VOTE] SOC temporary committer Anders Nyman

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:48 AM 7/12/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Well if Tim wants to mentor that project, then fine with me. I'm sure he will ensure the integrity of the Tomcat source outside that 'sandbox' repository. Exactly the point; there were no SoC participants who did not have mentors. If this slides into

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1

2005-07-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:08 AM 7/11/2005, jean-frederic clere wrote: JK 1.2.14 has been released. Uhm, I've said several times before you took a stab at being the RM, but no, it had not been released, it's just a tarball. You must wait for 3 +1's and more +1's than -1's before calling it released. blogs, slashdot

Re: Fwd: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon

2005-08-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:51 PM 8/9/2005, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, Is anyone speaking about Tomcat at ApacheCon 2005 US? It will be nice to have something... And related to that, who's planning on going? In my two tracks (one may be BOF) I will be speaking to both mod_proxy_ajp and mod_jk on Win32. But truly had

RE: Fwd: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon

2005-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:14 AM 8/11/2005, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, These are good, but I feel like we should talk about the new stuff we've been doing: PMC, APR connector, etc. Then again, I don't feel like doing the talks myself at the moment, so I'll just shut up about it now ;) Well, pmc is a noop (it's business

  1   2   >