RE: [JK2] uriMap vhosts

2002-09-23 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 23 de septiembre de 2002 9:06 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: [JK2] uriMap vhosts Hola Mladen: I agree with the introduction including the new vhost:* form, FYI uriEnv, when the host is not setted, responds that host is * :), the

RE: [JK2] uriMap vhosts

2002-09-23 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] There is no difference, if one needs to map a Java context to one the alias of the default server, the only way to do it, is to think about the default server, exactly as any other VS, it has a name (

RE: [JK2] uriMap vhosts

2002-09-23 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 23 de septiembre de 2002 10:47 From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] There is no difference, if one needs to map a Java context to one the alias of the default server, the only way to do it, is to think about

RE: [JK2] uriMap vhosts

2002-09-23 Thread Costin Manolache
My only requirement: make sure whatever we define as mapping in jk2 ( i.e. jk_map, etc ) works identically with the Location in Apache. IMO this is an important use case, with Location JkSet /Location ( i.e. use the native apache mapper, bypassing jk_map). Jk_map should use mappings

Re: [JK2] uriMap vhosts

2002-09-23 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: 1. Making some sort of _default_ mappings These mappings are for every host on the server (both default and every vhost). There is no particular reason for that except that the workers2.properties can be smaller. 2. Making vhost:port scheme Using general vhost:*