Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads=val for use with --with-apr. This

Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere a écrit : Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads=val for

Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread Kurt Miller
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kurt Miller wrote: Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got a question or two I think there are two cases: 1) when --with-apr is specified 2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ? BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ? BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build Hi Henri, I'm about completed with the patch for the

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kurt Miller wrote: Before I start making a patch, I'd like to make sure I've got the new behavior nailed down... It seems like there is some conflicting stuff going on. Apr may need to be configured without threads at times (without for

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised patch (I missed a spot). Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4 === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_apr.m4,v

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: Kurt Miller wrote: Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised patch (I missed a spot). Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4 === RCS file:

[Fwd: Re: jk2/apr patch]

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
Does someone else got those kind of messages? If yes could the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] be removed from the tomcat-dev list? Cheers Jean-Frederic BTW: I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be removed... ---BeginMessage--- AUTOMATED MESSAGE DO NOT REPLY -- The e-mail

RE: [Fwd: Re: jk2/apr patch]

2003-10-31 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
I'm not receiving this messages from the list, i'll try to unsubscribe them anyway.. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fwd: Re: jk2/apr patch

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread Kurt Miller
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: Kurt Miller wrote: Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised patch (I missed a spot). Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: Kurt Miller wrote: Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised patch (I missed a spot). Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread Kurt Miller
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kurt Miller wrote: Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got a question or two I think there are two cases: 1) when --with-apr is specified 2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are specified In

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-30 Thread Kurt Miller
Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised patch (I missed a spot). Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4 === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_apr.m4,v retrieving revision