RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shrotriya, Sumit wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:45:20 -0600 > From: "Shrotriya, Sumit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: HTTPS to HTTP > > Craig, > > I agree with you 100% bu

RE: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shah, Sanjay wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:02:32 -0500 > From: "Shah, Sanjay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: 'Craig R. McClanahan' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE:

Re: reading forms

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Peter Choe wrote: > Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:40:19 -0500 > From: Peter Choe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: reading forms > > is there a way to specify the order of the parameters are read from a form >

Re: How to specify a name for a content beeing served by s servlet

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Cédric Viaud wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:24:24 +0100 > From: Cédric Viaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: How to specify a name for a content beeing served by s servlet > > Hi, > > i

Re: DTD for server.xml??

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Martin Jacobson wrote: > Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 16:06:27 +0100 > From: Martin Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DTD for server.xm

RE: HELP, PLEASE! Tomcat creates too many threads!

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Joao Filipe Placido wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:58:02 - > From: Joao Filipe Placido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Craig R. McClanahan' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subje

Re: Servlet Mapping Strategy w/ user-specific URLs

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Winter wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:35:09 -0500 > From: Jeffrey Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Servlet Mapping Strategy w/ user-specific URLs > > > > At 01:48

Re: Evaluating jsp inside java

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Rami Ojares wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:06:16 +0200 > From: Rami Ojares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Evaluating jsp inside java > > Hi > > I am building tag which takes it's > bodycontent and e

RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, neal wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 03:54:05 -0800 > From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat > > I'm not presuming its priority #1 always, bu

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, John Holman wrote: > Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:58:19 + > From: John Holman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP > > > > Ralph Einfeldt wrote: > > >I don't think that

Re: HTTPS to HTTP

2003-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, John Holman wrote: > Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:56:16 + > From: John Holman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: HTTPS to HTTP > > Yes, that is clearly a risk. The *whole* web appli

RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
t; :-). Guess I won't be trusting *your* judgement on which server to use for my next application. :-) > Neal > Craig > > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:24 PM > To: Tomcat Users

RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
and then forwarded to the welcome file from there, so that relative URIs still work as expected. Craig > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:36 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Sta

Re: Tomcat 4.1.18 jsp import and include error

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, David Hemingway wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:18:09 +1100 > From: David Hemingway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.18 jsp import and include error > > Noel, > > I th

Re: IPv6 Support in Tomcat

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Surendra Kumar wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:25:51 +0530 > From: Surendra Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: IPv6 Support in Tomcat > > Hi All >Is IPv6 support available

RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
s given with a trailing slash, forward to the welcome file. This still screws up relative references for people that use wierd welcome file paths like "foo/bar.html", but will work for the majority -- and it seems to be the way that Apache and other web servers deal with the issue. > >

RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:33:50 -0500 > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat > > > No problem, glad to he

Re: Another JNDI Configuration issue

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, srinath narasimhan wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:17:50 -0500 > From: srinath narasimhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Another JNDI Configuration issue > > > > I am running tomca

Re: using catalina-ant.jar in Tomcat 4.0.6

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Erik Price wrote: > Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:12:14 -0500 > From: Erik Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: using catalina-ant.jar in Tomcat 4.0.6 > > My Tomcat container is 4.0.6. >

RE: DTD for server.xml??

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Geiglein, Gary wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:18:53 -0500 > From: "Geiglein, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DTD for server.xml?? > > It might be useful to have a referen

Re: DTD for server.xml??

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:31:16 -0500 > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: DTD for server.xml?? > > > Hello - > > I notice that the top of w

Re: Resource - Cannot load JDBC driver class 'null'

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 07:54:31 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Resource - Cannot load JDBC driver class 'null' > > Hello, > I created a DataSource("jdbc/SAA") throu

RE: Problem with invalidating a session

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Ralph Einfeldt wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:53:22 +0100 > From: Ralph Einfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Problem with invalidating a session > > See below: > > > -O

Re: Java NIO and IIs/IE ACK/NAK Requests

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Jacob Hookom wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 00:38:22 -0600 > From: Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Java NIO and IIs/IE ACK/NAK Requests > > Two things I'm wondering about: > > First, is ther

Re: tomcat manager servlet

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Erik Weibust wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:05:47 -0800 (PST) > From: Erik Weibust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat manager servlet > > i am having problems grasping the differences between > th

Re: Tomcat 4.x and Java Processes

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Troy J. Kelley wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 15:07:03 -0500 > From: Troy J. Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4.x and Java Processes > > I've been looking all over for the answer to this and

Re: How to organize your software in proper version control structure?

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Will Hartung wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:05:05 -0800 > From: Will Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: How to organize your software in proper version control > struc

RE: HELP, PLEASE! Tomcat creates too many threads!

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Denise Mangano wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:31:01 -0500 > From: Denise Mangano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: HELP, PLEASE! Tomcat creates too many threads! > > I am curio

Re: server.xml- linking to a context containing a jndi resource fromanother context

2003-01-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 6 Jan 2003, Nick Torenvliet wrote: > Date: 06 Jan 2003 22:52:05 -0500 > From: Nick Torenvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: server.xml- linking to a context containing a jn

Re: Strange behaviour of Tomcat classloader

2003-01-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Michael Gerdau wrote: > Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 10:21:02 +0100 > From: Michael Gerdau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Strange behaviour of Tomcat classloader > > Hi ! > > I've come a

Re: Tomcat-4-1-12 Connection Pool problem JNDI Datasource

2003-01-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, David Hemingway wrote: > Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:45:08 +1100 > From: David Hemingway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat-4-1-12 Connection Pool problem JNDI Datasource > > Hi, > > Sorry if this has b

Re: Works with invoker servlet but not without

2003-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Les Hartzman wrote: > Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) > From: Les Hartzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Works with invoker servlet but not without > > I'm using Tomcat 4.1.18 on Linux. Whe

Re: Loading XML Files - Best Pracitices

2003-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Jacob Kjome wrote: > > To tell you the truth, I would just use a SAX parser. That will be faster > than any of the other methods including JDOM. > If you've look at SAX and find it too complicated, you might want to take a look at a couple of projects in the jakarta-commons

RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Brandon Cruz wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:23:24 -0600 > From: Brandon Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection > > C

Re: Why a JNDI URL from getServletConfig().getResource() in Tomcat

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Trevor Porter wrote: > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 12:33:56 -0800 > From: Trevor Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why a JNDI URL from getServletConfig().getResource() in Tomcat > > I'm trying to read in

Re: web.xml format

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Erik Price wrote: > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:23:46 -0500 > From: Erik Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: web.xml format > > Just a simple question -- if I want to use an ampersand (or other > charact

RE: JSP help: A bit off topic

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
> myObject.getSomeString() /* This will actually contain all the code in > JSP, just to avoid the JSP page cluttered with Java Code */ If you expect getSomeString() to return *JSP* code (including tags and scriptlets and all), you can't do that. The JSP code is compiled the first time you exe

RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Saurabh Arora wrote: > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 02:33:17 -0700 > From: Saurabh Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection > > Just wanted to know, does the current implem

RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Andreas Probst wrote: > Hi Craig, > > please see intermixed. > > On 2 Jan 2003 at 18:18, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > > > Instances can be garbage collected IF AND ONLY IF there are no > > live references to that object in a static

RE: Release of memory

2003-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Øyvind Hvamstad wrote: > > However, what does tomcat do after the "service" method returns? The > Servlet interface has a "destroy" method, is it used? Why doesn't Tomcat > release the servlet instance? Can anyone explain the reason? > Because the theory of a servlet contain

Re: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
he service method. And, don't forget that this will harm performance for the vast majority of users who *do* have adequate memory on their servers, so nothing like this should be enabled by default. > This is a feature I could really use well. > > llap, > julian Craig &

RE: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
t created a memory leak. The best thing you can do to avoid problems like this is to make your webapps self contained, and to always release references to objects you don't need any longer. > Brandon Craig > > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[

Re: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Brandon Cruz wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:16:23 -0600 > From: Brandon Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Memory Usage and Garbage Collection > > Do lo

RE: can tomcat do dynamic virtual hosts?

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:51:42 -0500 > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: can tomcat do dynamic virtual hosts? > > > H...interesting

RE: Release of memory

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Øyvind Hvamstad wrote: > > But if tomcat releases the reference to the servlet, the hole thing > should be garbage collected. Tomcat does not release references to the servlet. In fact, it's totally up to the container (not to you) to decide how long a servlet instance will

Re: Can tomcat listen only to unix socket?

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Gery Kahn wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:29:22 +0200 > From: Gery Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Can tomcat listen only to unix socket? > > I am trying to config Tomcat 4.1.

RE: can tomcat do dynamic virtual hosts?

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:05:18 -0500 > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: can tomcat do dynamic virtual hosts? > > > Since a virtual host

Re: reducing tomcat & jasper memory footprint

2002-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Julian Löffelhardt wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:37:10 +0100 > From: Julian Löffelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: reducing tomcat & jasper memory footprint > > Hi, > > I'm

Re: application context loaded twice

2002-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Mohan Radhakrishnan wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:52:15 +0530 > From: Mohan Radhakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: application context loaded twice > > Hi, >Why w

Re: How to "really" seal/secure directories or files with Tomcat?

2002-12-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, mech wrote: > Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:04:50 +0100 > From: mech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to "really" seal/secure directories or files with Tomcat? > > Hi, > > I was

Re: Remote access to Tomcat's naming service

2002-12-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, John Paliwoda wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 14:35:59 -0600 > From: John Paliwoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Remote access to Tomcat's naming service > > Does anyone know how to get an InitialCont

Re: Servlet API: how to obtain the roles list ?

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Pierre-Laurent Ribault wrote: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 10:48:44 +0900 > From: Pierre-Laurent Ribault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Servlet API: how to obtain the roles list ? > > Hi, > > I want to obt

RE: Object Pooling

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Tim Moore wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:07:49 -0500 > From: Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Object Pooling > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felipe Schnac

Re: request / suggestion

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 15:35:03 -0500 (EST) > From: Jason Pyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: request / suggestion > > As I have a big screen... > And I

Re: request / suggestion

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason Pyeron said: > please have the list server put the list name in the subject, example: I'm opposed to this idea. It's already possible to filter on the "To" or "Cc" addresses, so adding something like this to enable filtering on the "Subject" is redundant

Re: Sealing Violation due to inclusion of LifeCycle?

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Tomcat User wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:11:05 -0700 > From: Tomcat User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Sealing Violation due to inclusion of LifeCycle? > > > > > The fund

Re: Sealing Violation due to inclusion of LifeCycle?

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Randy Secrist wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:25:51 -0700 > From: Randy Secrist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Sealing Violation due to inclusion of LifeCycle? > > I have been bu

Re: javax.sql.datasource

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:58:18 + > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: javax.sql.datasource > > hi all, > > where i can find out javax.sql.datasource (

Re: Web app specific Listener (was Re: Listener Element in Context:class not found Exception)

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Tobias Dittrich wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:59:08 +0100 > From: Tobias Dittrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Web app specific Listener (was Re: Listener Element in Context:

Re: How to configure JNDI resource with connection pool?

2002-12-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Andrew Guts wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:55:16 +0200 > From: Andrew Guts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: How to configure JNDI resource with connection pool? > > Hi all, > > I

Re: Classloading question

2002-12-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Madere, Colin wrote: > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:11:22 -0600 > From: "Madere, Colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Classloading question > > I put a jar in /common/lib/ that has so

RE: Should not be this hard(why is this a security risk)

2002-12-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Tim Moore wrote: > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:48:37 -0500 > From: Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Should not be this hard(why is this a security risk) > > > -Origina

Re: Is TC role mapping spec conform?

2002-12-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
See intermixed. On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Thomas Paradies wrote: > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:40:52 +0100 > From: Thomas Paradies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is TC role mapping spec conform? > > Hi, > > I'm a little bit confus

Re: Tomcat Documentation WAS: jsps and servlets don't work

2002-12-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Rasputin wrote: > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:59:37 + > From: Rasputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Rasputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat Documentation WAS: jsps and s

Re: Latest stable version?

2002-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 18 Dec 2002, Ben Ricker wrote: > Date: 18 Dec 2002 14:43:52 -0600 > From: Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Latest stable version? > > I am running Tomcat 4.0.6 in a production environment ri

Re: HttpSession issues

2002-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 18 Dec 2002, Felipe Schnack wrote: > Date: 18 Dec 2002 09:12:20 -0200 > From: Felipe Schnack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: HttpSession issues > > Yes, but this is related to an user session. H

Re: ContainerServlet interface

2002-12-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 16 Dec 2002, Felipe Schnack wrote: > Date: 16 Dec 2002 15:43:09 -0200 > From: Felipe Schnack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ContainerServlet interface > > The security holes it opens are relate

Re: Two inhibiting problems in developement with tomcat 4

2002-12-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Tomcat User wrote: > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:18:13 -0700 > From: Tomcat User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Two inhibiting problems in developement with tomcat 4 > > Lukas Öst

Re: context.xml inside war and outside

2002-12-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
just move my config to the database instead. > Why don't you just stick the context.xml file into "webapps" instead? It will still get auto-deployed, and the docBase there can point wherever you've go the actual webapp. > Cheers, > Anthony Craig > > - Ori

Re: Simultaneous request from same IP

2002-12-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Chris Bick wrote: > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:05:45 -0500 > From: Chris Bick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Simultaneous request from same IP > > Hello, > Has anyone seen two requests from

Re: context.xml inside war and outside

2002-12-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Anthony Ikeda wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:08:51 +1100 > From: Anthony Ikeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: context.xml inside war and outside > > I have moved my Context declarations from the se

Re: Sharing session between contexts

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:10:54 -0800 > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sharing session between contexts > > Hello all, > >

RE: HttpSessionListener beforeSessionDestroyed? no,HttpSessionActivationListener

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Garrett Smith wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:05:46 -0800 (PST) > From: Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: HttpSessionListener beforeSessionDestroyed? no, > Ht

Re: HttpSessionListener beforeSessionDestroyed (Craig, Sean)?

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Garrett Smith wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 18:04:42 -0800 (PST) > From: Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: HttpSessionListener beforeSessionDestroyed (Craig, Sean)? > >

Re: HttpSessionListern BUG in 4.1.12 ! ?!

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Jeff Wishnie wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:35:18 -0800 > From: Jeff Wishnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: HttpSessionListern BUG in 4.1.12 ! ?! > > It appears the session obje

Re: Difficult sections in server.xml and web.xml...

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Johnson, Garrett wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:00:59 -0500 > From: "Johnson, Garrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Difficult sections in server.xml and web.xml... > > Ladie

Re: DBCP Pool Max Connection

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Sundar Chakravarthy wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:18:34 -0500 > From: Sundar Chakravarthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: DBCP Pool Max Connection > > > What happens if #concurr

RE: RequestDispatcher scenarios ( was RE: static url routing)

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, RXZ JLo wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 05:31:12 -0800 (PST) > From: RXZ JLo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: RequestDispatcher scenarios ( was RE: static url routing) > > > --- "

Re: RequestDispatcher scenarios ( was RE: static url routing)

2002-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, RXZ JLo wrote: > > > > If you're serving your own static content with your > > own servlet, then you > > could do this. Using a Filter lets you use Tomcat's > > standard static file > > serving servlet with no modifications. > > > It seems I am confused about how RequestDis

Re: sitemap issue.

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Chris Bowlby wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 23:10:59 -0400 (AST) > From: Chris Bowlby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: sitemap issue. > > > Hi All, > > I've got a site map issue that I was wondering if

Re: "null"s in tomcat logs

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Manavendra Gupta wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:01:09 +0530 > From: Manavendra Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Manavendra Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: "null"s in tomca

RE: Accessing the Context tag attributes of server.xml ...

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Sridhar Devulkar wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:31:42 -0800 > From: Sridhar Devulkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Accessing the Context tag attributes of server.xml ...

Re: Tomcat uptime and stability in production environments

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Mike W-M wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:24:27 - > From: Mike W-M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat uptime and stability in production environments > > I remember someone

Re: Catalina Directory Listing

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Gerrit Grobbelaar wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:47:35 +0200 > From: Gerrit Grobbelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Catalina Directory Listing > > How must I configure Catalin

Re: [classloading] How to use URLClassLoader within a servlet

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Ola Berg wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:19:35 +0100 > From: Ola Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [classloading] How to use URLClassLoader within a servlet > > >Or you cou

Re: Tomcat - a search engine liability?!?!

2002-12-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:33:43 -0800 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat - a search engine liability?!?! > > It's probably not much help, but Tomcat 5.x

RE: Tomcat - a search engine liability?!?!

2002-12-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:15:32 -0500 > From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat - a search engine liability?!?! > > Colin, > > The d

Re: The future of Tomcat and java.nio

2002-12-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 11 Dec 2002, Joe Tomcat wrote: > Date: 11 Dec 2002 12:39:11 -0800 > From: Joe Tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: The future of Tomcat and java.nio > > On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 09:25, Jeanfrancois

Re: Custom Valves and Administration Tool

2002-12-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Jon Eaves wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:17:53 +1100 > From: Jon Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Custom Valves and Administration T

Re: Custom Valves and Administration Tool

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Jon Eaves wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:38:48 +1100 > From: Jon Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Custom Valves and Administration Tool > > Hi all, > > Thanks to Bill Barker

Re: Specifying tag outside of server.xml

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Wendy Smoak wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:17:34 -0700 > From: Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Specifying tag outside of server.xml > > > I seem to rememb

RE: I don´t understand the objective of this open list !

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Turner, John wrote: > You're forgetting that Tomcat is a reference implementation. This is not actually true in the legal sense, or really any longer relevant in the practical sense. In the legal sense, Tomcat code is *used in* the reference implementation for J2EE, which

Re: Q: SingleThreadModel and Tomcat

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, David Boyer wrote: > Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:19:12 -0600 > From: David Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Q: SingleThreadModel and Tomcat > > It seems like different servlet containers vary in how t

Re: Reloading classes in shared dir

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Luiz Ricardo wrote: > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:14:40 -0200 > From: Luiz Ricardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat-Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Reloading classes in shared dir > > Hi everybody, > > I would like to k

Re: How to get a "File" for a certain folder

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Patrick Kosiol wrote: > Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:34:30 +0100 > From: Patrick Kosiol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: How to get a "File" for a certain folder > > Hi, > > how can I get

Re: RequestDispatcher scenarios ( was RE: static url routing)

2002-12-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
tic url routing) > > > --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To do a redirect filter, then, you'd examine the > > request URI to determine > > what kind of remapping is needed, and then do a > > RequestDispatcher.forward() c

Re: Tomcat shared libraries

2002-12-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Dave Ford wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 12:38:31 -0800 > From: Dave Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat shared libraries > > > > > Now the problem

Re: NullPointerException from incorrect JDBCRealm setup

2002-12-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
To avoid it getting lost in mail folders, could you please submit a bug report for this? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ Thanks! Craig On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Bill Schneider wrote: > Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:18:23 -0500 > From: Bill Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List

RE: manager/reload = restart?

2002-12-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Jonas Björnerstedt wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 00:08:28 +0100 > From: Jonas Björnerstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: manager/reload = restart? > > Thank's for the reply. >

Re: Security constrant to force SSL works with apache+tomcat?

2002-12-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Pae Choi wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:17:12 -0500 > From: Pae Choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Security constrant to force SSL works with apache+tomcat? > > javax.servlet

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >