On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:16, John Turner wrote:
> Well, you may be stuck...the libpthread error indicates a problem with
> system libraries...implies the need for an admin.
>
> John
Well going by a Quake FAQ of all things:
http://www.planetquake.com/eclipse/q2bug.shtml
It would seem the version of
it's a long story involving politics and it's only a dev box. :O)
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 16:01
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Well, I think you may be stuck
ssage-
> From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
>
>
>
> Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the
> latest patch
Killed
bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf&qu
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Can you build things from source? Does your Solaris box have all of the
latest patches?
Where did you get 1.3.26? There's a 1
ng Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confi
OK, cool. Solaris 2.6 might be a little iffy for the GNU tools, so you'll
probably want to stick with binaries. I had a heck of a time getting
mod_jk to build on Solaris 2.7, my guess is it wouldn't be any better with
2.6.
.27 is preferred, but I won't be picky. You can check my Solaris 7 HO
arted
After installing Apache 1.3.26. Using mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
K.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Can you tell us what platform you're usi
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:02
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Can you tell us what platform you're using? Can you confirm exactly what
Apache version you have?
JK and JK2 are Apache version sen
3.6/libexec/mod_jk-
1.2
.2.so: symbol dir_module: referenced symbol not found
bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
-Original Message-
From: stephan beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apach
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 14:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote:
> No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used.
>
> Apache 1.3.6 is ancient..
O)
Cheers,
Kev.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 13:51
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option.
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20
On Monday 16 June 2003 14:56, John Turner wrote:
> No, its saying that the wrong (incompatible) .so file is being used.
>
> Apache 1.3.6 is ancient...I doubt any of the JK sources will work
> with it, and there have been 21 revisions to the 1.3 source since
> (currently at 1.3.27). If "1.3.6" isn'
g your LoadModule line in httpd.conf needs a tweak.
It should read:
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-
Norm
- Original Message - From: "Thomas, Kevin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003
ge-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 13:51
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Tomcat 4.1 most definitely supports the auto configuration option.
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:22 +1000, NormW <[EMAIL PR
Complete HOWTO, step by step:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:53:45 +1000, NormW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good evening Kevin.
Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example
applications
that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs
.
>Nothing wrong with 'dummies'
Very true!
-----Original Message-----
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Good evening (here)... how's Monday going?
What platform a
Norm
- Original Message - From: "Thomas, Kevin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Thanks for the reply.
figuration. What module are you
using? Mod_jk or md_jk2?
Norm
- Original Message - From: "Thomas, Kevin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomc
Hi -
Tomcat doesn't write out the file unless you modify server.xml to include
Listener elements, one for each Server you have defined, and one for each
Host you have defined.
More info in my HOWTOs: http://www.johnturner.com/howto (search for
Listener), and there is an example of the generate
7;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
> Norm.
>
> I used the basic format that being offered on that website to understand
> what changes were required. After following them (making
find symbol
bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
Any ideas? (sorry to bug you with this one!)
-Original Message-
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:54
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Good evening Kevin
Good evening Kevin.
Takes my cue! What they are configuring there are the example applications
that come with Tomcat read what you can of the Tomcat docs once you get
Apache and Tomcat working and 'see' how straight-forward the setup actually
is... a bunch of settings that tell Apache what to s
On Monday 16 June 2003 13:20, NormW wrote:
> Just a tad too quick with the 'send'... mod_jk or mod_jk2? If you
> don't have a preference, go with mod_jk... it has only recently been
> updated and if you get auto config working, it only supports jk
> anyway.
> There are slots at Jakarta for the bina
wing some instructions on
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/11/20/tomcat.html?page=2 to see if I
can get things running this way.
-Original Message-
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:20
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf
ompile or buy...
Norm
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
> Monday is as
ROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 12:00
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Good evening (here)... how's Monday going?
What platform are you running Apache and Tomcat on, and will they be on the
same or different machines?
Nothing wrong with
nd they're used
every day by just about everyone.
Norm
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomca
)
Kev.
-Original Message-
From: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 11:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Good evening Kevin
AFAIK Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the auto configure option so I've never tried
it
t;
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> When you say you haven't used it, does that mean you don't run with Apache
1:17
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Question regarding "tomcat-apache.conf" file.
Good evening Kevin.
I think you might need to read a little further..
AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf
file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 sup
Good evening Kevin.
I think you might need to read a little further..
AFAIK there is a specific startup option for Tomcat to generate the .conf
file for Apache, and that's assuming Tomcat 4.0 supports it
Apologies for the vagueness but it's not a feature I've actually used.
Norm
- Origina
32 matches
Mail list logo
