RE: Tomcat 3.2`

You will need to be aware of a little bit about how classloaders behave. Tomcat will create a webapp classloader that includes WEB-INF/classes and the jars WEB-INF/lib. In Tomcat 3.2.x, a parent of this webapp classloader is the CLASSPATH classloader. As the parent, classes in the webapp

RE: Tomcat 3.2 versus 4.1

Ronen, The biggest issues I have seen are 1. Tomcat 4 strictly adheres to the DTD for the web.xml for web applications where as some version of Tomcat 3 did not. The DTD for the web.xml is specfied in the Servlet specs available at http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/download.html. I do not

Re: Tomcat 3.2 versus 4.1

Hi Ronen, We just completed the upgrade ourselves. For our applications, we are getting MUCH better performance with Tomcat 4.1. We had an issue with CPU usage constantly increasing over time with 3.2.4, which seemed to go away with 4.1. The upgrade wasn't too bad, we just installed 4.1,

Re: Tomcat 3.2 and 4.1 coexist?

I performed your taskk without any trouble. 3.2 is running on port 8080, 4.1. on 8090. You just have to change the file server.xml to define the new port. Both versions are running in parallel. They've been installed in /usr/local/tomcat3 and /usr/local/tomcat4 Carsten Am Montag, 25.11.02, um

RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what you describe should work. If your docBase is set to /net/webapps/test, then the .. in your include is trying to go outside of the webapp, which is not allowed. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

My docbase is set to /net/webapps Still gives me bad argument to include file Steve --- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what you describe should work. If your docBase is set to /net/webapps/test, then the .. in your include is trying to go

Re: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR MAILING LIST.I DO NOT KNOW WHO YOU ARE... THANK YOU... - Original Message - From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:48 AM Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths If your docBase

RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR MAILING LIST.I DO NOT KNOW WHO YOU ARE... THANK YOU... - Original Message - From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:48 AM Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File

RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

I don't know why it wouldn't work other than due to a simple typo. Larry -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:48 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths My docbase is set to /net/webapps

RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths My docbase is set to /net/webapps Still gives me bad argument to include file Steve --- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what you describe should work. If your docBase is set to /net

Re: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

work other than due to a simple typo. Larry -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:48 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths My docbase is set to /net/webapps Still gives me bad argument to include

Re: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths

: RE: Tomcat 3.2 : Include File Paths My docbase is set to /net/webapps Still gives me bad argument to include file Steve --- Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If your docBase is set to /net/webapps then what you describe should work. If your docBase is set to /net

RE: Tomcat 3.2.x

I use tomcat 3.2.4 and haven't noticed this problem. Not sure about the earlier versions of 3.2.x. Brandon -Original Message- From: Daniel Bruce Lynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 3.2.x I'm curious as to

RE: Tomcat 3.2.x

I was under the impression that you need to rename your zip files to jar files to get Tomcat 3.2 to load them. At least that's what I have noticed in using Tomcat 3.2 with JBuilder. Robert Nocera New England Open Solutions www.neosllc.com You supply the Vision. We will do the rest.  

Re: tomcat 3.2 and external webapps (again)

Never mind, I finally found it, in the deployment section of the online docs for 3.2. Add a context entry to server.xml, etc. Sorry about the static. - Original Message - I wrote: I seem to recall several posts on this, but can't figure out how to get them from the archive, and I

Re: tomcat 3.2 to 4.0

Glanced at the catalina.out log Any idea the source of this error. Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 PARSE error at line 1 column 10 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Element type web-app must be declared. PARSE error at line 95 column 12 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The content of element type web-app must

RE: tomcat 3.2 to 4.0

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:48 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat 3.2 to 4.0 Glanced at the catalina.out log Any idea the source of this error. Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 PARSE error at line 1 column 10 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Element type web-app

Re: Tomcat 3.2 vs Tomcat 3.3

I looked at 3.3 and it looked considerably different than 3.2 to me. I was able to upgrade my servlet applications to 4.0 with general ease. The directory structures for sure are much more similar between 3.2 and 4.0 than they are between 3.2 and 3.3. But then only been at this for a short

RE: Tomcat 3.2 vs Tomcat 3.3

I've recently upgraded from 3.2 to 4.0.1. Wasn't very painful. Did it in one day. Had to change taglib .tld files which contained the xmlns attribute within the taglib tag to instead use the DOCTYPE tablib .. form instead. Also had to get latest Warp stuff to get around a servlet file upload

RE: Tomcat 3.2 vs Tomcat 3.3

The main advantages of Tomcat 3.3 over 3.2.x is its performance, stability, and configurability. The improvements do lead to differences, so there is some learning involved when upgrading. For example, Tomcat 3.2.x puts auto-generated config files for Apache, etc. in the same conf directory

Re: TOMCAT 3.2 - 4.0, JDBC, MySQL

There's not enough info to tell, but it looks like the MySQL driver and TC 4.0.1 are working correctly. Are you using the security manager that comes with TC 4?? If so, you need to modify catalina.policy to allow this connection. --David Smith On Wednesday 31 October 2001 09:51 am, you

Re: TOMCAT 3.2 - 4.0, JDBC, MySQL

Hi David, I've started tc 4.0 with the init script. I'm not sure whether tomcat is started with -security or not. Which modifications are needed? How do these look like? Christian David Smith wrote: There's not enough info to tell, but it looks like the MySQL driver and TC 4.0.1 are

Re: TOMCAT 3.2 - 4.0, JDBC, MySQL

Hi Reid, ups...i'm so nutty ;-).. of course, the privileges... Thanks, Christian Reid Beckett wrote: This doesn't sound like a problem with Tomcat configuration. It has something to do with the mysql user privileges. Assuming the dbURL, username, and password are correct, the user may

Re: TOMCAT 3.2 - 4.0, JDBC, MySQL

I didn't install from RPM, so I don't know what the init script looks like. It might or might not start the security manager. If Reid's suggestion to check the MySQL permissions doesn't help, check out the comments at the bottom of catalina.policy for how to set security permissions for the

RE: Tomcat 3.2 and Saxon

Having XML parser/XSLT conflicts is a known issue in Tomcat 3.2. I believe the saxon.jar would need to go in TOMCAT_HOME/lib. If Tomcat won't start, perhaps a more compatible XML parser that the current xerces.jar could be found. If not, I think you are out of luck with Tomcat 3.2.x. Without

Re: Tomcat 3.2 Mac OS 9.1 JNI UnsatisfiedLinkError

I use Webstar 4.4, which will interface (redirect url) with Tomcat. I'm still trying to solve my link error, I'm wondering if anyone on this list has insight into this. Tomcat 3.2: I was advised to start tomcat with -Djava.library.path={path to shared lib} I looked through tomcat source, and

Re: Tomcat 3.2 Mac OS 9.1 JNI UnsatisfiedLinkError

Just curious... What web server would you hook Tomcat up to... It's not like Apache works on Mac OS 9.x...

RE: Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 standalone, which is better to use now?

if it's for stability then coose a apache/tomcat combination. it's definately more stable and also faster than using tomcat standalone. i know this wasn't your question, but i definately didn't have good experiences with tomcat standalone. i think it's main purpose is for testing. -Original

Re: Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 standalone, which is better to use now?

Laurens Fridael at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which is better for standalone usage? Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 beta6 ? Stability is my most important consideration. I know Tomcat 4 is still beta but I read that it already performs well. Without ANY whatsoever doubt... 4.0. I'm currently

Re: Tomcat 3.2

Hi, Just replace Classic VM with HotSpot Server VM. Best regards Dalibor [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Reply Separator _ Subject: Tomcat 3.2 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Deniz Gülmez [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at INTERNET Date:

Re: Tomcat 3.2 standalone on Solaris 2.7 core dumping

HI Tom: try increasing the memory available to shell in which your tomcat server is running(on popup window in case ur using defaults) It might work Hemant - Original Message - From: Tom Amiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001

RE: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilization

D, Did you find a resolution to this? I am experiencing the same issue. Load keeps rising over a period of time until the machine can no-longer take requests. ENV: Sparc Sol 2.6 Tomcat 3.2.1 Java j2re1_3_0_02 Apache 1.3.17 Using mod_jk Anyone know where to look? Jason Maderios

RE: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilization

Read the 3.2.1 release notes doc (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/readme) and see if the 6.11 issue in there applies to your configuration. Donnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/22/01 11:06AM D, Did you find a resolution to this? I am experiencing the same issue. Load

RE: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilization

s our name on it. TY! Jason Maderios -Original Message- From: DONNIE HALE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilization Read the 3.2.1 release notes doc (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomc

RE: Tomcat 3.2 IIS 5.0

Have you specified the JAVA_HOME directory in the tomcat.bat file? set JAVA_HOME = C:\jdk1.2.2\ Have you installed the isapi_redirect.dll in IIS? Are you specifying the http://server:8080/ in your URL? I just installed it and works fine for me. -Original Message- From: Schmid, Klemens

Re: Tomcat 3.2 IIS 5.0

ubject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 IIS 5.0 Have you specified the JAVA_HOME directory in the tomcat.bat file? set JAVA_HOME = C:\jdk1.2.2\ Have you installed the isapi_redirect.dll in IIS? Are you specifying the http://server:8080/ in your URL? I just installed it and works fine for me. -Origin

RE: Tomcat 3.2, RMI, JNDI Classloaders: a solution

Carlos, Thanks. This is interesting. Can you explain what the effect of Thread.setContextClassLoader() is? Does it make classes from the WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes area avaiable to classes loaded by the boot class or system class loader? Andrew -Original Message- From: Carlos

RE: Tomcat 3.2, RMI, JNDI Classloaders: a solution

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Andrew Gilbert wrote: Carlos, Thanks. This is interesting. Can you explain what the effect of Thread.setContextClassLoader() is? Does it make classes from the WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes area avaiable to classes loaded by the boot class or system class loader?

RE: Tomcat 3.2, RMI, JNDI Classloaders: a solution

You can make them visible, but the class from the boot classloader or system classloader has to know what to do -- it calls Thread.getContextClassLoader() to get the class loader for the current thread, and asks *that* classloader to create the new object, instead of using the "new" operator.

Re: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilisation

Read the 3.2.1 release notes doc (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/readme) and see if the 6.11 issue in there applies to your configuration. Donnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/01 05:26AM Hi there. I notice a few people have claimed to see high cpu utilisations when

Re: Tomcat 3.2 CPU utilisation

Very much obliged. That looks like a definite possibility. Regards D I Macdonald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TOMCAT 3.2 + session

To be exact it takes 12 minutes to login (=create session) when running Netscape browser and the TOMCAT servlet engine on the same machine. Axel Lannion/France -Original Message- From: Bartsch Axel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: mercredi 28 f vrier 2001 14:34 To: [EMAIL

RE: TOMCAT 3.2 + session

i believe this has something to do with the SecureRandom that's userd by tomcat to create sessionid's. the initialisation takes quite long but only the first time. try accessing the servlet from another computer or user another browser! netscape's behavior is not really suitable if the test

RE: Tomcat 3.2 throwing a VerifyError at me

It would appear to me that you are trying to create an instance of a class (using Class.newInstance()) that doesn't have a matching contructor to how you are trying to load it. If I remember correctly, newInstance only works with No-Argument constructors. Check for this, and if its not

RE: Tomcat 3.2 throwing a VerifyError at me

It would appear to me that you are trying to create an instance of a class (using Class.newInstance()) that doesn't have a matching contructor I never call Class.newInstance() at all in my code. maybe Jasper is generating this call? How do I check this, and how do I stop it from

RE: Tomcat 3.2 throwing a VerifyError at me

will help solve the problem. Randy -Original Message- From: Rajnish Bhaskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 throwing a VerifyError at me It would appear to me that you are trying to create

RE: Tomcat 3.2 throwing a VerifyError at me

An easy way to find it is to introduce an error in the JSP and look at Jaspers error message, which includes the full path to the file. -Original Message- From: Randy Layman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2

RE: Tomcat 3.2 admin app

PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 admin app What is your enviroment??? Try going to port 8080 where Tomcat is actually listening.. something like this http://localhost:8080/admin The admin index page should come up

RE: Tomcat 3.2 admin app

What is your enviroment??? Try going to port 8080 where Tomcat is actually listening.. something like this http://localhost:8080/admin The admin index page should come up!! Stefan

RE: Tomcat 3.2 admin app

But whats the login?? --- Stefan Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is your enviroment??? Try going to port 8080 where Tomcat is actually listening.. something like this http://localhost:8080/admin The admin index page should come up!! Stefan = If your into Body For

RE: Tomcat 3.2 admin app

The login is what ever you define in the tomcat-users.xml file in the conf directory under your tomcat installation. Tomcat doesn't give a default setup for the admin role so you have to edit it yourself. Try something like: tomcat-users user name="tomcat" password="tomcat"

Re: Tomcat 3.2 Hardware Requirements, OS

This information is available in the tomcat-aache.org ..when u visit this site they would have given the platforms in which they have sucessfully tested tomcat ..Win 98 , NT ,Unix,Solaris. Linux ...supports Narayanan

Re: tomcat 3.2 and 3.2.1 slow

Mohan Surender typed the following on 03:46 AM 1/13/2001 -0600 when i run tomcat from jbuilder3 i notice a significant delay in running jsps ( the num guess jsp for example takes 50 seconds every first time i start tomcat and run it) the same jsp executes very fast in tomact 3.1. Is it also slow

Re: tomcat 3.2 and 3.2.1 slow

Kief Morris wrote: Mohan Surender typed the following on 03:46 AM 1/13/2001 -0600 when i run tomcat from jbuilder3 i notice a significant delay in running jsps ( the num guess jsp for example takes 50 seconds every first time i start tomcat and run it) the same jsp executes very fast in

RE: tomcat 3.2 and 3.2.1 slow

Cannot start tomcat under windows 98? attached is log file. Already increased environment variable to 2016mb. Got any ideas -Original Message- From: Kief Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat 3.2 and 3.2.1

RE: Tomcat 3.2 Beta 2 - IOException in ... - Connection aborted by peer: socket write error

the only thing i noticed is that this Exception is thrown only when i put a reference to files larger than 3K What could this mean ? Sounds like the peer client is getting tired of waiting for a transfer to complete. I had a similar problem when generating PDF's on the fly. The

RE: Tomcat 3.2 stability

- De: Duane Morse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: Quinta-feira, 7 de Dezembro de 2000 14:59 Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Assunto:RE: Tomcat 3.2 stability You might want

Re: Tomcat 3.2 standalone + SSL - Help please

try https://ip.add.re.ss:8443 instead. ie has to know that you want to use https instead of http Filip - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 2:26 PM Subject: Tomcat 3.2 standalone + SSL - Help please I have followed the

Re: Tomcat 3.2 - getRequestDispatcher().forward

Goss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2 - getRequestDispatcher().forward Graeme, No, the forwarded request is treated as the same request. Matt Graeme Wallace wrote: Hi, Is the behavior

Re: Tomcat 3.2 SSL error:Error reading request

Hi Robert, I can tell you keystores for 1.2 and 1.3 are not compatible (at least in my experience). I ignored the note about compiling tomcat and was able to get SSL working in tomcat standalone configuration.See the Dasho-Pro reference? That's a tag from deep in the Cipher suite. I'm

Re: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

web.xml is no longer used/supported in 3.2. The main reason - the code that merged the "default" web.xml with the application web.xml was very bad, slow and hard to maintain. It was commented out until someone wants to fix it. A second reason - probably more important from a user

Re: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

Given that the default web.xml is not being read, how do you enable Jikes as the JspCompiler? That setting used to be in web.xml. What's the syntax to specify it in server.xml, or did we lose this functionality for Tomcat 3.2? (If so, could it be put back, or define a syntax in server.xml

Re: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

Given that the default web.xml is not being read, how do you enable Jikes as the JspCompiler? That setting used to be in web.xml. What's the syntax to specify it in server.xml, or did we lose this functionality for Tomcat 3.2? (If so, could it be put back, or define a syntax in

Re: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

I just compiler the attached file into a class, put the class into the webserver.jar (to avoid changing CLASSPATH for testing) and modified server.xml file with: ContextInterceptor className="tc3.JasperOptions" sendErrToClient="false" keepgenerated="false" / after the WebXmlReader

RE: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

Thank you for the fast turnaround :-) I'll try it out. Barbara. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:44 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] org' Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2 - Default web.xml not being read

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + Windows NT 4 + mod_jk

When you start apache from the command line what does it tell you? I am guessing you have Tomcat in standalone pointing to the same port as apache wants to use. Check your tomcat.conf. Quoting "Hernandez, Rey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I know this has probably been addressed before,

RE: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + Windows NT 4 + mod_jk

Note that with mod_jk, you have to start Tomcat first, then Apache. If you followed the directions in the howto, you'll see that you include in httpd.conf a file that is not present until Tomcat is running. -Original Message- From: Hernandez, Rey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + Windows NT 4 + mod_jk

CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + Windows NT 4 + mod_jk Note that with mod_jk, you have to start Tomcat first, then Apache. If you followed the directions in the howto, you'll see that you include

RE: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + Windows NT 4 + mod_jk

s anyone know why my way didn't work? Anyway, thanks for the help, I knew it had to be a simple user error. Rey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 + Apache 1.3.14 + W

RE: Tomcat 3.2 stability

Does anybody already have something like this. Duane Morse [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/07/2000 11:59:24 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2 stability You might want to write a simple JSP or servlet that

RE: Tomcat 3.2 Final and Taglibs

You're using a jar file for your tag library, right? I think Tomcat is expecting to find the TLD file in the jar file under subdirectory META-INF; further, it is expecting the file name to be "taglib.tld". -Original Message- From: David Geary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Tomcat 3.2 tries to read POST data before forwarding to JSP

Craig, I'm looking at using the MVC method for a current project... how exactly does struts benifit this framework? just curious... Also (since, I've got you ear), I've tried a similar process under tomcat 3.1 where I route all requests (ieservlet-mappingservlet-namerouter/servlet-name

Re: Tomcat 3.2 tries to read POST data before forwarding to JSP

Matt Goss wrote: Craig, I'm looking at using the MVC method for a current project... how exactly does struts benifit this framework? Struts is an implementation of the MVC processing model, including a controller servlet and a framework for defining actions, plus mechanisms for assigning

Re: Tomcat 3.2 tries to read POST data before forwarding to JSP

thanks... :) Matt "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: Matt Goss wrote: Craig, I'm looking at using the MVC method for a current project... how exactly does struts benifit this framework? Struts is an implementation of the MVC processing model, including a controller servlet and a framework

Re: Tomcat 3.2 tries to read POST data before forwarding to JSP

Duane, The problem you're referring to doesn't happen to me, even though I use this kind of programming approach all the time (in Struts). Do you have a simple test case that you can send to help us isolate this? Craig McClanahan Duane Morse wrote: The following partial stack trace

Re: Tomcat 3.2 ClassCastException after servlet update on getAttribute

David Rees wrote: I also just tried this on Tomcat 3.2, same problem. Again, here's the problem: I have a form which posts to a jsp, which then instantiates a bean with the data from the form, which then forwards the request to a servlet which does a getAttribute to obtain then the bean

RE: Tomcat 3.2 ClassCastException after servlet update on getAttribute

Hi Craig, -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] David Rees wrote: I also just tried this on Tomcat 3.2, same problem. Again, here's the problem: I have a form which posts to a jsp, which then instantiates a bean with the data from the

RE: tomcat 3.2 b8

YOU HAVE TO MENTION it in httpd.conf(Apache), can be done away with at tomcat level.. in tomcat just map the contexts. You need to have different web.xml in each of your application root(Web-INF) IF you are starting two different tomcat's then you obvously will be needing to different

RE: Tomcat 3.2-b7 not compliant to Servlet Specification 2.2 ?!

I posted a patch a few days ago to fix this problem. In most cases Tomcat shutsdown every other context starting with the first one added so you might be able to adjust the order of the contexts in your server.xml file to make sure that it hits the ones you really need shutdown. If you can

Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP

Olivier Baillard wrote: I would kike to know if somebody already have some experience with tomcat and PHP working as serlet (with Tomcat). If somebody has some interest, I would be happy to exchange my own experience. I get PHP to work with Tomcat 3.2 beta 7 on Linux with Java extension.

RE: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP

] Subject:Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP Hallo, I've tried this as well, and was really happy with the results. However please take into account that the windows versions of PHP are quite different in terms

Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP

Christian Wenz wrote: I've tried this as well, and was really happy with the results. However please take into account that the windows versions of PHP are quite different in terms of stability. Some versions just fail to cooperate with Tomcat, crashing reproducably, however most versions

Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP

Hello Christian, I'am happy to see someone else in the world has tried to use PHP and Tomcat together. Sooo!! Which version of PHP work (or doesn't work) on Windows? For the moment, I only really try on SUSE 7.0. with Apache. Which results did you get? Personally, I get the following: -

Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta and PHP

Hi Olivier, the version not working was 4.0.1 - if I remember correctly. I tried it of course in a very unstable environment (Win98, Microsoft's own PWS, old JDK 1.1.8) and had no luck (however all versions from 4.0beta to 4.0.0 worked really fine, and chances that I made some mistakes when

RE: Tomcat 3.2-beta-6 or 4.0m3?

Hi Tomcat developers, I'd love to see some info on the release plans for these products too. I presume that those of you with "committer" status have some general long-term plans I understand that software development schedules (and esp. open-source projects) are difficult to estimate, but

[tomcat-user] RE: Tomcat 3.2-beta-6 or 4.0m3?

Yes, a page modeled after: http://us1.samba.org/samba/development.html would indeed kick ass.. I think the tomcat cvs is too intimidating... There should be a document explaining the tags... Anycase, my theory is that 3.3 (note that apache doesn't follow the even version number scheme of the

Re: Tomcat 3.2-beta-6 or 4.0m3?

To follow up on a few of the items from my perspective as a Tomcat developer: Kitching Simon wrote: Hi Tomcat developers, I'd love to see some info on the release plans for these products too. I presume that those of you with "committer" status have some general long-term plans I

Re: Tomcat 3.2 Installation Problems

I had this exact problem (and the SAXParserFactory error too). This SAXParserFactory was solved by downloading the jaxp library from Sun. The config error was solved by putting *all 3* jar files in that jaxp file in the CLASSPATH somewhere or modifying CLASSPATH in the tomcat startup files to