Message-
From: Thomas Charles Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:26 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: What Connector Should I Use?
This note here says:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The JK connector is now deprecated. Use the Coyote JK 2
connector instead.
(http
List
Subject: RE: What Connector Should I Use?
This note here says:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The JK connector is now deprecated. Use the Coyote JK 2
connector instead.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/jk.html)
So now the question what is supported? (or better still, which
JK or JK2 is the connector, the protocol is AGP.
I would use the JK connector as it works and all advancements in JK2 are going
to be back ported
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Charles Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 16:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What
I think the other reason cited in the news does not apply to me. I use
jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure. Of course, if people already
have the jk configure in production, why would they bother upgrading to jk2
and creating a new learning curve? Look at how many sites still use Apache
Phillip Qin wrote:
I think the other reason cited in the news does not apply to me. I use
jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure.
You are the first one saying that :).
Of course, if people already
have the jk configure in production, why would they bother upgrading to jk2
and creating a
-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2004 11:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
Phillip Qin wrote:
I think the other reason cited in the news does not apply to me. I
use jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure.
You
'
Subject: RE: What Connector Should I Use?
Will you suggest that we can now start switching jk2 to
either mod_proxy or
mod_jk? I really hate jk because it is difficult to configure
(am I the
first one to say that?) compared to jk2. I am kinda guy that
would like to
deal with the enemy
: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2004 11:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
Phillip Qin wrote:
I think the other reason cited in the news does not apply to me. I
use jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure.
You are the first
Phillip Qin wrote:
Will you suggest that we can now start switching jk2 to either mod_proxy or
mod_jk? I really hate jk because it is difficult to configure (am I the
first one to say that?) compared to jk2. I am kinda guy that would like to
deal with the enemy I know, in this case - jk2.
Well
David Boyer wrote:
I really like (and depend upon) the regular expression URI matching
capabilities of JK2 and that has driven my decision to use JK2. I
believe the regexp matching is being back-ported into JK, and once that
happens I think I will probably go that route and drop JK2.
Right now
Allistair Crossley wrote:
hope this is not a thread hijack ..
in terms of IIS, will the isapi_redirect.dll be recommended for use rather than
the JK2 isapi_redirector2.dll?
Yes.
I'm planning even to make a InstallShiled installer for
isapi_redirector, so that users don't need to set all that
by
And when (roughly) is Apache 2.1 due?
Michal.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
Phillip Qin wrote:
Will you suggest that we can now start
This note here says:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The JK connector is now deprecated. Use the Coyote JK 2
connector instead.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/jk.html)
So now the question what is supported? (or better still, which
documentation should I be reading for current correct
13 matches
Mail list logo
