RE: jk2.properties Query

2005-02-15 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hari Mailvaganam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: jk2.properties Query > > Does Tomcat 5.0.28 have mod_jk on by default? The default server.xml has an AJP13 connector defined on port 8009; it's been that way for a long time. You should comment it out if you don't need it. - Chuck

RE: jk2.properties

2004-06-06 Thread Martinelli Paolo A.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: jk2.properties I've never tried it, but you should be able to set jkHome="/path/to/new/home" on the Connector element to have Tomcat look for /path/to/new/home/conf/jk2.properties. Of course, Tomcat will also use this as the base for any other relative

Re: jk2.properties

2004-06-05 Thread Bill Barker
I've never tried it, but you should be able to set jkHome="/path/to/new/home" on the Connector element to have Tomcat look for /path/to/new/home/conf/jk2.properties. Of course, Tomcat will also use this as the base for any other relative file references (e.g. the unix-socket file). "Martinelli Pa

Re: jk2.properties documentation

2004-03-19 Thread Daniel Savard
Le ven 19/03/2004 à 01:06, Chong Yu Meng a écrit : > Daniel Savard wrote: > > >Is there any documentation on the jk2.properties? > > > > > There is the Jakarta documentation available on their site. Or you could > dig through the source code. > I also looked at the Jakarta docs, however, for

Re: jk2.properties documentation

2004-03-18 Thread Chong Yu Meng
Daniel Savard wrote: Is there any documentation on the jk2.properties? There is the Jakarta documentation available on their site. Or you could dig through the source code. After reading the document: http://cymulacrum.net/writings/tomcat5/c831.html#USING_MOD_JK2 I still get a problem lying w

RE: jk2.properties

2003-07-10 Thread James Courtney
day, July 10, 2003 3:07 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jk2.properties I think you can leave all entries commented when you're using channelSockets, however when you use channelUnix (fast unix sockets) you need some entries in jk2.properties. (see http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss/mod_jk2

Re: jk2.properties

2003-07-10 Thread Simon Pabst
I think you can leave all entries commented when you're using channelSockets, however when you use channelUnix (fast unix sockets) you need some entries in jk2.properties. (see http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss/mod_jk2.html for details) At 14:28 10.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: Under what circumstances a

Re: jk2.properties

2002-11-04 Thread Robert L Sowders
cc: Subject: Re: jk2.properties

Re: jk2.properties

2002-11-04 Thread Maxime
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 5:34 PM Subject: Re: jk2.properties > Instead of using the variable in workers2.properties for serverRoot, you > can hard code it to where you've installed Apache > &g

Re: jk2.properties

2002-11-01 Thread Robert L Sowders
Instead of using the variable in workers2.properties for serverRoot, you can hard code it to where you've installed Apache rls "Maxime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/01/2002 07:42 AM Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: