Jérôme Duval wrote:
Why would you compare Apache and Tomcat vs. SunONE? Isn't there a lot of
overhead in using the connector and all that? Seems to me a more logical
test would be Tomcat vs SunONE and the most recent version of both, which
Tomcat 4.1.30 is not. I smell bogus test results!
When I
having used SunOne in the past, I would agree 2-5x faster is not
likely or even possible. SunOne is a combination of the old Netscape
code, jvm and the reference implementation of the servlet spec.
In practice, it is no different than servlet containers that use
native library for handling
-
From: V D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 11:24 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance
I used it for webservice before, and it is faster than Tomcat, but I
wouldn't say that was 2 to 5 times for that particular case. You can get it
for free
and the most recent version of both, which
Tomcat 4.1.30 is not. I smell bogus test results!
-Original Message-
From: V D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 11:24 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance
I used it for webservice before
, August 02, 2004 10:07 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance
I am sorry for not being clear enough.
The test did not run with both Apache and Tomcat, only Tomcat 5.0.
Please understand that I do not try to create a flame war here. This is
only a particular case
!
-Original Message-
From: Vy Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:07 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance
I am sorry for not being clear enough.
The test did not run with both Apache and Tomcat, only Tomcat 5.0.
Please understand that I do
I've just finished reading the report and can find no where in the report that
Tomcat failed
It *does* indicate that the combination of Apache httpd and Apache Tomcat had
problems - but the report does not indicate, as far as I can tell, which
component reported the failure. Without
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/04/10/java_servlet_engines.html
Above is Sun's market share of production sites.
So...
.V
On Friday 30 July 2004 05:40 pm, David Wall wrote:
It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than
Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this
I used it for webservice before, and it is faster than Tomcat, but I
wouldn't say that was 2 to 5 times for that particular case. You can
get it for free because it's bundled with the Application Server
platform which is free.
Julian wrote:
Just downloaded it to give it a try. There's a trial
David Wall wrote:
It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than
Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this from Sun Java Web Server vs.
Apache/Tomcat Benchmarks.
The link to the KeyLabs report is at
Just downloaded it to give it a try. There's a trial version but
nevertheless it costs only $75.
David Rees wrote:
David Wall wrote:
It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than
Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this from Sun Java Web Server vs.
Apache/Tomcat
11 matches
Mail list logo
