'
Subject: RE: What Connector Should I Use?
Will you suggest that we can now start switching jk2 to
either mod_proxy or
mod_jk? I really hate jk because it is difficult to configure
(am I the
first one to say that?) compared to jk2. I am kinda guy that
would like to
deal with the enemy
: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2004 11:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
Phillip Qin wrote:
I think the other reason cited in the news does not apply to me. I
use jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure.
You are the first
Phillip Qin wrote:
Will you suggest that we can now start switching jk2 to either mod_proxy or
mod_jk? I really hate jk because it is difficult to configure (am I the
first one to say that?) compared to jk2. I am kinda guy that would like to
deal with the enemy I know, in this case - jk2.
Well
David Boyer wrote:
I really like (and depend upon) the regular expression URI matching
capabilities of JK2 and that has driven my decision to use JK2. I
believe the regexp matching is being back-ported into JK, and once that
happens I think I will probably go that route and drop JK2.
Right now
Allistair Crossley wrote:
hope this is not a thread hijack ..
in terms of IIS, will the isapi_redirect.dll be recommended for use rather than
the JK2 isapi_redirector2.dll?
Yes.
I'm planning even to make a InstallShiled installer for
isapi_redirector, so that users don't need to set all that
by
And when (roughly) is Apache 2.1 due?
Michal.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
Phillip Qin wrote:
Will you suggest that we can now start
This note here says:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The JK connector is now deprecated. Use the Coyote JK 2
connector instead.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/jk.html)
So now the question what is supported? (or better still, which
documentation should I be reading for current correct
)!
Below is an excerpt from my tomcat4 1.4.30 release, server.xml:
!-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --
Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector
port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75
enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443
Hi ,
I have configured tomcat 5.5.3 with jk connector . My jk.config is
LoadModule jk_module
modules/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6-linux-fc2-i386-apache-2.0.50.so
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers2.properties
JkAutoAlias /usr/local/tomcat/webapps
JkMount /java-server/* testWorker
Resending...anyone know???
-Original Message-
From: Dan Carwin
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 5 - coyote/jk2 connector defaults - maxthreads, timeout?
what is the default maxThreads in tomcat 5 jk2/coyote connector? What is
the default
Bret and Robert, I would suggest that getting a packet trace is the next
step in tracking down your performance problem. If you don't already have
such a tool, Ethereal is a top notch open-source tool for this which is
distributed with linux, but also freely available for windows and mac at
what is the default maxThreads in tomcat 5 jk2/coyote connector?
What is the default serverTimeout ?
#channelSocket.serverTimeout=???
#channelSocket.maxThreads=???
(fwiw I'm referring to the version included in tc 5.0.28)
Thanks,
Dan
Hi,
this did not have any takers the first time so I am trying to see if I will get a
response this time
I keep getting the following messages popping up in the win2k applications log with
event id 2
- Error: [jk_worker_ajp13.c (546)]: ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error
12
Hi Everyone,
I'm having some JSP performance problems using the JK2 Connector between
Tomcat 5 and IIS6 in Windows Server 2003.
If I hit my site as mySite:8080, everything works fine. However, if i
just hit mySite, thus going through the JK2 connector, the performance of
the JSP pages greatly
to each
other.
Confounded. Any suggestions
-Original Message-
From: Brett Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown
Hi Everyone,
I'm having some JSP performance problems using
Hi,
I keep getting the following messages popping up in the win2k applications log with
event id 2
- Error: [jk_worker_ajp13.c (546)]: ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error
12
- Error: [jk_workerEnv.c (492)]: workerEnv.processCallbacks() Error reading reply
- Error:
suggestions for working
around this problem or patches to the connector out there?
Thanks,
Jonathan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a Linux SUSE SLES 8, it has apache 1.3.
Does I need apache sources to compile jk2 connector to obtain mod_jk2.so
to put in module?
Can I use JK2 with apache1.3 or I have to use the JK connector?
Thanks in advance, Matteo.
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler
Microsoft VisualC++ 6.0
OS: Win 2k: SP4
I am getting following errors while building isapi module of JK2
connector. Could you pl suggest me to fix this issue?
Configuration: isapi - Win32 Release
Compiling...
jk_isapi_plugin.c
C:\jk2\native2\server\isapi
2004 00:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4/Apache 2 Connector slow down
I have a very bizarre situation:
I have everything working as far as the connectivity between
Tomcat 4 and Apache 2 with both the JK and JK2 connectors (of
course not at the same time :)
I am currently
and the different configurations (only affected
computer B)
1) Using JK connector and port 8080 (so bypassing Apache 2): Everything flies
2) Using JK connector and port 80 (going through Apache 2): Moderate slow down of
about 4 to 5 times slower than going direct on port 8080. So a page
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs.
CoyoteConnector
Are these 2 Connector's mutually exclusive and/or redundant in the same
server.xml?
...
Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector
port=8101 minProcessors=5
(for backwards compatibility and ease of
troubleshooting).
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:14 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs.
CoyoteConnector
Hi
Hi,
Can the CoyoteConnector handle regular HTTP and AJP13 requests?
Yeah, but only one at a time. So if you want both, you need two
instances of the connector, like you had in your original post.
Yoav
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication
Are these 2 Connector's mutually exclusive and/or redundant in the same
server.xml?
...
Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector
port=8101 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75
enableLookups=true acceptCount=100
debug=0 connectionTimeout=2
-side redirects is strong and convincing.
As you already have to convince Apache of which server it is, it is just a
matter of stating to your connector which server it is, too (you can
override the connector's assumptions in your connector-definition,
right?).
Well, for me both arguments
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Why is Tomcat/Connector Installation So Incredibly Painful??
|
| Well, that's subjective, so I won't argue. I find it not only elegant,
| but far better than one thread pool for the whole server
]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Why is Tomcat/Connector Installation So Incredibly
Painful??
|
| Well, that's subjective, so I won't argue. I find it not only
elegant,
| but far better than one thread pool for the whole server, but it's a
| matter
that the recent Linux kernel
| update wasn't up to Tomcat's liking. For whatever the reason, Tomcat's
| initialising of the TLS connector blocks in a read from /dev/random,
| always. Ensuring that it reads from /dev/urandom instead makes it happy
| again.
( Nothing very valuable in the following, really
On 07 September 2004, Endre St?lsvik said:
The mod_jk approach of inventing a new binary protocol and whatnot is
maybe not the right solution for this. A simple raw forwarding of the
requests from Apache HTTPD to Apache Tomcat would be incredibly nice.
Do what I did: try to replace mod_jk with
Hi,
* to forward both SSL and non-SSL requests with mod_proxy, you'd
need two HTTP connectors in Tomcat, meaning two thread pools
This is a serious stumbling block? Really? I buy your other
(redirect-related) argument but not this one at all. You can easily
configure thread pools to
[me]
* to forward both SSL and non-SSL requests with mod_proxy, you'd
need two HTTP connectors in Tomcat, meaning two thread pools
[Yoav Shapiro]
This is a serious stumbling block? Really? I buy your other
(redirect-related) argument but not this one at all. You can easily
configure
Hi,
It wasn't the overhead of the extra thread pool that bothered me, it's
more the fact that Tomcat would be unable to amortize thread creation
as
well. Eg. if I have one thread pool with max 75 threads for *all*
requests, then Tomcat only has to create 75 threads, period. But if I
need a
On 03 September 2004, Peter Alvin said:
But why is it so
incredibly painful to install Apache/Tomcat/Connector? It always
takes me about two days. I look forward to it as much as doing my
federal tax returns.
I'm in complete agreement with you. Even finding the right files to
download
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TLS-Enabled Connector Prevents Startup
Hi there.
On one day, an otherwise perfectly functioning Tomcat stops responding
to requests. The log file says that one of the threads received an
OutOfMemory exception, so I
can't expect anyone to care. All
of us also have jobs and don't get paid for making your life easier.
We'd love to evaluate and integrate any improvements you can come up
with, but naturally connector documentation has never been an area of
high interest to most tomcat developers. Moreover, as Tomcat
Has the certificate the SSL/TLS connection uses
expired? This will cause the TLS connection to fail
to come up. Then, if you have a security constraint
defined in your web.xml file that requires TLS for
your initial pages, the redirect from your normal port
to the TLS port will fail (since the
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
|
| Hi,
| I would point out a few things:
[ - chop - ]
Do you really deny that mod_jk is somewhat hard to install? I mean,
probably 50% av the OH MY WHATEVER - I CAN'T GET THIS TO WORK!!! mails
are related to mod_jk..
| Moreover, as Tomcat as maturing
| Moreover, as Tomcat as maturing the importance of the connectors in
| general is going down IMHO, with more and more standalone
installations.
I've missed the begining of this but in most environments I have worked in
tomcat/app servers are used behind webservers, so connectors or proxies
On 07/09/04 15:27, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Is there any additional debug output in the logger, specifically a
ClassNotFoundException or a NoClassDefFoundError for a TLS-related
class? Has the JVM you're using changed?
Unfortunately, there is no additional output. I would have been very
happy
.
One also have other HTTP servers than Apache, in particular IIS.
And that has to do with my post, how? ;)
All I said mod_jk is trivial to download (I didn't say anything about
installation), the connector documentation is not a high priority for at
least some of the tomcat developers
to your liking -- and I see there have been a fair
number of gripes (warranted or not, I won't answer to that ;) -- then
you're free to write another.
Some would complain that creating Yet Another Connector isn't the
answer, but nor is Staying Unhappy With What's There, Knowing It Won't
Change
by that CA. Both valid until 2013, for another nine
years. Tomcat 5.0.18 worked happily with that keystore for several
months. Tomcat 5.0.25 also worked with it for several weeks, until I
restarted it few days ago.
Besides, just the TLS connection not working is not the problem. When a
TLS connector
.
We'd love to evaluate and integrate any improvements you can come up
with, but naturally connector documentation has never been an area of
high interest to most tomcat developers. Moreover, as Tomcat as
maturing the importance of the connectors in general is going down IMHO,
with more and more
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
|
| Even if it isn't for anything else, a transparent forwarding
| mechanism
| between a specific subset of the server's URL namespace (quote from
| ServletContext) of the server holding the listen call at port 80, and
| Tomcat, will always be needed, I
. For whatever the reason, Tomcat's
initialising of the TLS connector blocks in a read from /dev/random,
always. Ensuring that it reads from /dev/urandom instead makes it happy
again.
Although I haven't had anything to try with, I assume that every Java
program was affected by this, not only Tomcat
Hi,
Thanks for posting your solution.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Igor Zlatkovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: TLS-Enabled Connector Prevents Startup
I have found
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:59:46PM +0200, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
: however bizarre that may sound. It seems that the recent Linux kernel
: update wasn't up to Tomcat's liking. For whatever the reason, Tomcat's
: initialising of the TLS connector blocks in a read from /dev/random,
: always
and...
All I said mod_jk is trivial to download (I didn't say anything
about installation), the connector documentation is not a high priority for
at least some of the tomcat developers, and that if someone wants to bitch
and moan without contributing they're welcome to, but they shouldn't expect
On 07/09/04 20:12, QM wrote:
You may want to check what the kernel's using as a source of randomness.
I forget the details, but IIRC /dev/urandom never blocks, whereas
/dev/random may block under {some condition I can't recall in detail}.
Well, the server in question is a vServer, a virtual server
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:57:10PM -0400, Lon Palmer wrote:
: It's obvious to me ( and probably to everyone else that uses
: it ) that then entire process of installing mod_jk is broken. It takes too
: much fiddling and effort.
I don't share that view. I've setup mod_jk a few times, and it was
did it, and I got a little ahead of myself and had to restart. Do it will
clean everything and you should be fine.
From: QM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is Tomcat/Connector Installation So Incredibly
Yes I meant 4.1.30. My fupah. Yes 30 not 3.
Sorry.
Cary
SH Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI
Got Jakarta 4.1.3 installed from fresh copy that I got from the jakarta
site.
You are joking?
4.1.30 is current. I hope, you ment 4.1.30 and not 4.1.3...
Regards,
steffen
HI
Got Jakarta 4.1.3 installed from fresh copy that I got from the jakarta
site.
You are joking?
4.1.30 is current. I hope, you ment 4.1.30 and not 4.1.3...
Regards,
steffen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
somewhere.
Some experimentation has shown that it works again if I remove the
TLS-enabled connector from the conf/server.xml file. I have two
connectors there, one for HTTP, the other for HTTPS. Both worked good
until this last crash. Now, for some mysterious reason, if the HTTPS
connector is present
Hello Folks,
It has been a long week. I finally got the Apache 2.0.50 to compile on AIX 5.2. I
had to use gcc to get it done. Too many issues with C for AIX 6.
Have moved on. Got Jakarta 4.1.3 installed from fresh copy that I got from the
jakarta site. I also used the Jakarta 4.1.3
Don't get me wrong; I love Java; I love Tomcat.
But why is it so
incredibly painful to install Apache/Tomcat/Connector? It always
takes me about two days. I look forward to it as much as doing my
federal tax returns.
My 2 cents: This installation process has to get as easy as running
From: Peter Alvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't get me wrong; I love Java; I love Tomcat.
But why is it so
incredibly painful to install Apache/Tomcat/Connector? It always
takes me about two days. I look forward to it as much as doing my
federal tax returns.
It took two days the first time, now
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 7:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Why is Tomcat/Connector Installation So Incredibly
Painful??
From: Peter Alvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't get me wrong; I love Java; I love Tomcat.
But why is it so
incredibly painful to install
, then include the
jars and
the setup, otherwise go back to ./configure and make.
My $0.02
-JG
Peter Alvin wrote:
Don't get me wrong; I love Java; I love Tomcat.
But why is it so
incredibly painful to install Apache/Tomcat/Connector? It always
takes me about two days. I look forward to it as much
Connector code. This class is responsible for dispatching
incoming requests to a Thread to handle it, which will then call the service
method on the Adapter to pass the request to Tomcat.
You'll also need to implement an InputBuffer (to read request bodies), an
OutputBuffer (to send the response
Is there a known issue with the connectors in Tomcat 4.1.30? Viewing the 2 connector
pages in Tomcat's admin site yeilds the same message: HTTP Status 500 - Error
retrieving attribute allowTrace
Tomcat 4.1.27 did not exhibit this problem.
Tested with Win2K Pro/j2sdk1.4.2_04 and Win2K Server
Hi,
We have a deployment of Tomcat serving Http requests using Servlets. We have
a requirement to support a custom protocol. I am thinking about having a
custom connector for this, since I can re-use rest of my code, instead of
developing a new server for this. Is there any documentation
Hello,
we ad IIS 5 with JK 1.x running as a frontend against TC 4.x-Cluster. All
works well.
Now we wanna change to IIS6, JK2 and TC5.
In the proof-of-concept, I saw that JK2 needs Tomcat-Path to be configured
in the registry.
Why that? On our IIS-Machines, there is no Tomcat. It is running on
Hello,
Has anyone out there experienced upload corruption using the following
setup?
1) IIS 5.0
2) JK 2.0.4 (binary)
3) Tomcat 4.1.30 (or 4.1.18) (W2K binary)
4) Generic doc upload servlet (I've tested many).
I'm noticing that files greater than ~1MB have extraneous bytes thrown into
the
: Doc upload corruption w/JK2 connector?
Hello,
Has anyone out there experienced upload corruption using the following
setup?
1) IIS 5.0
2) JK 2.0.4 (binary)
3) Tomcat 4.1.30 (or 4.1.18) (W2K binary)
4) Generic doc upload servlet (I've tested many).
I'm noticing that files greater than ~1MB
Hello,
We run a TomCat4-Farm with JK-Connector's 1.2.x on IIS6 Frontends.
We can't upgrade to Tomcat5 / JK 2.x jet.
IIS 6 is set to IIS 5 Compatible Mode as described in the Setup.
Now I heared it is also possible to run that in normal IIS6-Mode somehow...
Can anyone help / supply a Howto?
--
I don't know about JK-Connector 1.2. However, since I got JK_2 working
last week I have been running IIS 6 on a Windows 2003 Server in proper
'IIS 6' mode, ie with IIS 5 Emulation not ticked. All other config
details were as normal. It seems to work OK, in a very light load demo
environment
/fileupload/
My config is windows 2000, java 1.4.1_05, tomcat 4.1.30,
No problems...
-Message d'origine-
De : Bob Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 12 juillet 2004 10:19
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Doc upload corruption w/JK2 connector?
Hello,
Has anyone out
Hi,
I try to run the mysql connector with Tomcat with
security enabled
(NT4, jakarta-tomcat-5.0.25, j2sdk1.4.2_05,
mysql-connector-java-3.1.2-alpha-bin.jar)
With the rule
grant {
permission java.net.SocketPermission
localhost:3306, connect,resolve;
};
it works. But this rule is not specific
the .keystore file and uncommenting the default port
8443 connector, Tomcat seems to start fine. The only notable difference
is that a new connector is created (that should be a good sign). When
I connect to my server at localhost using port 8443, though, it sends
me a small piece of garbage in return
I try to enable HTTPS connections.
After generating the .keystore file and uncommenting the default port
8443 connector, Tomcat seems to start fine. The only notable difference
is that a new connector is created (that should be a good sign). When
I connect to my server at localhost using
I hope that people on this list can help me. I have been trying to install Apache and
Tomcat
on a Solaris 9 machine. I have had success up to the point of apache and tomcat
working. I am
working on getting the JK connector to work. I was using the documentation provided
at:
http
I got this message on httpd's error_log
ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3
ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error
ajp13.service() Error forwarding ajp13:/usr/share/tomcat5/work/jk2.socket 1
0
mod_jk2.handler() Error connecting to tomcat 3, status 200
My workers :
# Shared
Hello,
I was told on this mailing list that I could use the:
JkSet config.file /mypath/workers2.properties
command for example to define a new config file location. Now first I wanted
to know if this works also with Apache 1.3.31 ?
Another question is there any other parameters here I used
/ (but no
experience yet), I gather that I should create a connector for each IP
address. But I don't see how to associate a web app with a particular
connector. Do I need to create separate Host elements and use separate
appBases? Or is there another way altogether
app with a specific IP
(connector)?
Thanks. That looks simple enough. Does this mean that I don't need an
extra connector for the IP?
Patrick Willart wrote:
There is probably more than one way to do this, but one is by defining
multiple hosts and using an alias to bind the host to an IP.
You
I'm going to be running Tomcat with two IP addresses (each has its own
domain name). How do I associate some web apps with one and some with
the other?
From my reading of the /Server Configuration Reference/ (but no
experience yet), I gather that I should create a connector for each IP
-Original Message-
From: Barnet Wagman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 5:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: How do I associate a web app with a specific IP (connector)?
I'm going to be running Tomcat with two IP addresses (each has its own
domain name). How do I associate
I did this with two service.../service sections each with their own
connector/ tags and appBase values in their respective Host../Host
tags. It's probably over the top, but I wanted to be absolutely sure my
high security apps were only talking through a SSH encrypted tunnel to
the Apache
Thanks. That looks simple enough. Does this mean that I don't need an
extra connector for the IP?
Patrick Willart wrote:
There is probably more than one way to do this, but one is by defining
multiple hosts and using an alias to bind the host to an IP.
You could end up with something like
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 7:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 connector
Try commenting everything out in jk2.props, should get you connector
working even if the jni stuff takes more work afterwards.
Mark
On 5 Jun 2004, at 12:23, Ricky wrote:
Hi All,
I have
Hi All,
I have difficulty to make mod_jk2 connector to work. :-(
I try to use Unix Channel from this tutorial :
http://cymulacrum.net/writings/tomcat5/c840.html
The problems are:
- Can not generated jk2.shm jk2.socket
- Error in Catalina.out
INFO: APR not loaded
Try commenting everything out in jk2.props, should get you connector
working even if the jni stuff takes more work afterwards.
Mark
On 5 Jun 2004, at 12:23, Ricky wrote:
Hi All,
I have difficulty to make mod_jk2 connector to work. :-(
I try to use Unix Channel from this tutorial :
http
:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.*\.*) http://myspecificdomaib:8087/$1 [P]
then I set a tomcat connector listening on :8087 like this one
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 connector binary for solaris8
Try following the instructions below, these are what I use when building the
connector.
cd jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/jk/native2
./configure
Matt,
Thanks for your help so far. Now i am using Mod_jk2.0.2 + Apache2.0.43
+JBoss3.2.3. It is running perfect.
Now my problem is I will have to use 2 apache servers on 2 different
mechines.
Apach_box_1 has two tomcat/jboss (load balanceing)
Apach_box_2 has two tomcat/jboss (load balanceing)
I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0 Tomcat
4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work but I am uncertain. If
someone could clarify the difference between these connectors and which to use I would
greatly appreciate it. Thanks
Jk2 is a refactoring of jk. Jk2 uses APR library, and AFAIK, it's easier
to build against apache 2. I tried some days to make jk2 to work,
without too much success. mod_jk is a lot easier. jk2 gives you
statistics of the connector from the apache side.
Emerson
Reis, Tom wrote:
I am
the stable release i'll be sticking to it, at least for the
time being.
HTH Mark
On 27 May 2004, at 18:10, Reis, Tom wrote:
I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0
Tomcat 4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work
but I am uncertain. If someone could
I seem to remember there were problems if you tried to run jk1 with virtual hosts and
also apache https. Does that sound right?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:52 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Which connector to use
Hi there,
I have been strugling to compile Mod_jk2 2.0.4 for solaris8. I have never
worked with solaris and compiling C packages.
Can any body please help me finding a binary version of
Mod_jk2.0.4-SPARK-Solaris8-Apache2.0.49 or proper documentation?
I have had already spent 2 weeks for this
Try following the instructions below, these are what I use when building the connector.
cd jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/jk/native2
./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2.0.49/bin/apxs
--with-tomcat-41=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.25 \
--with-apr-lib=/usr/local/apache2.0.49/lib
Hi all,
I would like to finish this mailing thread and public results.
In the end I found that some thread waits in
java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(Native Method) method. Probably
reason was that server waited for timeout because client had broken
connection.
Because I have main entry
-connectors/jk2 page.
gunzip jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src.tar.gz
tar xvf jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src.tar
It created jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src directory.
2. Compile mod_jk2 connector.
(http://soccf-oj-001.ddns.comp.nus.edu.sg/y2004s/docs/bk04apds03.html
Just wondering if someone is working on the JK2 connector for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
(AMD64). If someone is and needs a test site, let me know.
Cheers,
Brad
Hi,
I am working with Apache 2.48 and tomcat 5.16.
I am able to connect them using the mod_jk2 connector and jkjni
connector.
My question is with the jkjni connector, both apache and tomcat run in
separate processes. Is it possible to configure the jkjni connector so that
tomcat runs
It is supposed to be possible but with that version of tomcat (5.0.16 i'm assuming) it
doesnt work. I've not tried yet but it is supposed to now work with the latest version
of both tomcat and the connector.
You configure this in workers2.properties and set the connector to be inprocess.
Ta
Thanks for the reply.
-Sreeni
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JKJNI connector.
It is supposed to be possible but with that version of tomcat (5.0.16 i'm
assuming) it doesnt work. I've
: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: How to limit time for Connector threads?
Hi Yoav,
What the original poster meant is not that there is a race condition
in Tomcat, but in his own web application.
Maybe we
201 - 300 of 1439 matches
Mail list logo
