Hello,
I have tried to configure mod_jk as a load balancer WITH sticky sessions.
I get the load balancing to work perfectly, but NOT the sticky sessions.
This is what I tried:
I set up 4 ajp13 workers and 2 lb workers.
Worker names are t1_a, t1_b, t2_a and t2_b.
Load balancer names are a and
On Wed, February 4, 2004 1at 1:31 am, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
Am I missing something very obvious?
Do jvmRoutes need to have the same name as the workers? I find that
strange, but I can't come up with something more logical...
Yes, they do.
-Dave
Hi,
You can try out these step-by-step instructions:
http://www.yorku.ca/dkha/tomcat/docs/apache-tomcat-modjk.htm
Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to configure mod_jk as a load balancer WITH sticky sessions.
I get the load
Thank you, Dave.
Do jvmRoutes need to have the same name as the workers?
Yes, they do.
Then that means I cannot have two AJP connectors on each Tomcat.
Proposed setup is, then:
Worker names are t1 and t2
Load balancer name is t:
t -- t1, t2
t1 -- tomcat 1 port X (jvmRoute=t1)
t2 --
