-Original Message-
From: Veniamin Fichin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
Madere, Colin wrote:
The docs at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
dont' quite seem
: Manuel González Castro [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
JK will finish w/o errors but no .so is present when done (and yes I've
searched thoroughly) (just tried again and now getting same errors
There is something wrong with the build system (at least for solaris)
as I had to go into the apache-2.0 directory and manually do a make
mod_jk.so and then it built it. Now looking it is also in the .libs
dir, but with the same timestamp and size as the .so NOT in the .libs
dir. shrug
As
--
mailto:Paul.Brzezinski;EDS.com
Enterprise Distributed Capabilities
EDS Corporation
248-265-8283
: -Original Message-
: From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner;AAS.com]
: Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:24 AM
: To: 'Tomcat Users List'
: Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
Damn I hate using Outlook (my apologies for formatting stupidity as I have
no choice but to use Outlook at work).
ild problems
Madere, Colin wrote:
The docs at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I
Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
Damn I hate using Outlook (my apologies for formatting
stupidity as I have
no choice but to use Outlook at work).
ild problems
Madere, Colin wrote:
The docs at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2
?
Note that gcc is installed and gets used for all other parts I've looked at
in the build output.
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:24 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
Must
not criticizing, just observing.
John
-Original Message-
From: Madere, Colin [mailto:colin.madere;ieminc.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:02 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
I will have to try again from scratch to see if this was the
issue. I
Message-
From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:08 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
Well, you're on x86, there's a very good chance that sunfreeware.com
doesn't
have all of the packages on x86 that they do
: RE: mod_jk build problems
Importance: High
--
mailto:Paul.Brzezinski;EDS.com
Enterprise Distributed Capabilities
EDS Corporation
248-265-8283
: -Original Message-
: From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner;AAS.com]
: Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:24 AM
--
mailto:Paul.Brzezinski;EDS.com
Enterprise Distributed Capabilities
EDS Corporation
248-265-8283
: -Original Message-
: From: Madere, Colin [mailto:colin.madere;ieminc.com]
: Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:19 PM
: To: 'Tomcat Users List'
: Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 12:34:05PM -0500, Brzezinski, Paul J wrote:
BTW, don't think Sun will release Solaris 9 for Intel...ever. I think
they're looking at marketing their own flavor of Linux for Intel.
They have announced that they will in fact release Solaris 9
for x86. Might be supported
: RE: mod_jk build problems
I had many hassles at first with building mod_jk on Solaris. I strongly
urge
building with GNU make, not the Solaris make. There are subtle differences
between the GNU and Solaris versions. Make sure the build environment has
access to libtool and autoconf
Aha! Ok, so I did that and also ran the libtool is states must be run. Now
I get to see if it works.
-Original Message-
From: Veniamin Fichin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
Madere
JK will finish w/o errors but no .so is present when done (and yes I've
searched thoroughly) (just tried again and now getting same errors as
below).
On SGI IRIX 6.5 mod_jk.so is under jk/native/apache-2.0/.libs instead of
jk/native/apache-2.0, and the .libs dir is hidden. Did you tried find
.
Madere, Colin wrote:
The docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I mean). I build with
the --enable-jni since it is suggested for Apache 2.0 and I get a
jk_jnicb.so but I don't get a mod_jk.so as the
that is
executed before running configure.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:res0ob23;verizon.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
I'm a Apache 1.3.x user, but have always had problems with the mod_jk
Makefiles
news:A0B0CE866AEECE4BBB3FA565A5CA62D343FE0F;brmail.ieminc.com...
That's it? No one has any clue? An answer to _any_ of the questions
asked?
-Original Message-
From: Robert L Sowders
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: 10/25/02 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
Send it to the bug database
1:17 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
I'm a Apache 1.3.x user, but have always had problems with the mod_jk
Makefiles for Solaris. At least with the older versions of mod_jk, I
could
hack the linux version and change some paths :-(. If you get it
working,
please post a patch to bugzilla
: Madere, Colin [mailto:colin.madere;ieminc.com]
Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 10:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List '
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
That's it? No one has any clue? An answer to _any_ of the questions
asked?
-Original Message-
From: Robert L Sowders
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
Hi Colin,
No answers to the compilation problems I'm afraid as I was suffering
more or less the same ones last week with no solutions.
However I do know you can get
That's it? No one has any clue? An answer to _any_ of the questions asked?
-Original Message-
From: Robert L Sowders
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: 10/25/02 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
Send it to the bug database.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
Guidelines
1) There seems to be an error in the scope of the make for mod_jk where it
expects to find 'libtool' in the common directory but it is in the parent
directory of the common directory. (couldn't find a good place to submit
this problem except here)
2) Let me prefix my problem description with
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:mod_jk build problems
1) There seems to be an error in the scope of the make for mod_jk where it
expects to find 'libtool' in the common directory but it is in the parent
directory of the common directory. (couldn't find a good place to submit
24 matches
Mail list logo
