mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread tomcat
All, hope this is the right place for this. I've an apache servers with 4 backend app servers and using mod_jk to balance the load over them. Two of the machines are a fair bit quicker than the other two, so I've adjusted the weighting with lbfactor app1 (slow) = lbfactor=100 app2 (slow) =

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
the load of each other. So mod_jk will balance to some extend but not as good as it could/should. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness I've

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread tomcat
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness I've an apache servers with 4 backend app servers and using mod_jk to balance the load over them. Two of the machines are a fair bit quicker than the other two, so I've

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread David Rees
On Fri, October 10, 2003 at 5:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ralph Einfeldt wrote: 2. mod_jk works with sticky sessions so only new sessions are balanced. I belief but am not shure that it's just round robin. 2 Surely then the new session would be

Re: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread Bill Barker
mod_jk will balance to some extend but not as good as it could/should. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness I've an apache servers with 4