mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread g . lams
Hi all, I've a jsp-based application (interface to an oracle db) that will go in production in January. The server is actually configured this way: SuSe 9.0, Apache 2.0.48 (with a virtual host redirecting everything to Tomcat), Tomcat-5.0.28, configured with mod_jk2 because I read that md_jk2

Re: mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread Mladen Turk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read (by chance?) somewhere on the jakarta web site that mod_jk2 (aka JK2) is officially unsupported since mid-November. Well, it is actually not supported for a much longer time :). At this point I'm not sure what to do: should I use JK? Should I stay with mod_jk2

RE: mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread Dale, Matt
The recommended ways to go are JK or mod_proxy_ajp. Ta Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 December 2004 11:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk2 future? Hi all, I've a jsp-based application (interface to an oracle db) that will go

Re: mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread QM
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:16:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Tomcat), Tomcat-5.0.28, configured with mod_jk2 because I read that md_jk2 : was the connector to use with apache 2.x.x Where did you read this? I ask because plain mod_jk (aka version 1) works just fine with Apache 2.x. A

Re: mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread g . lams
Actually I don't remember. When we decided to use Tomcat instead of Websphere a few months ago, I read quite a lot of documentation/articles (I'm not a developer, but the systems' administrator of our linux servers). I just remember reading the following line because I saved it: jk2 is a

Re: mod_jk2 future?

2004-12-20 Thread QM
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:02:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I will check with the developpers team whether switching from JK2 to JK : could be a problem but is there any known issues in switching from one : connector to the other (apart for the configuration files) I can't say, as I've