Tomcat as a standalone is really fast,reliable and good.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Anderson, M. Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:02 PM
Aan: Tomcat Users List
Onderwerp: Tomcat at Standalone
This question must have been asked a million times but I
I will attempt to answer you questions as best I can.
Your file structure of your site will typically look something like this
$CATALINA_HOME/
webapps/
(PLACE YOUR WEBAPPS HERE)
common/
lib/
scams, you will have a very safe environment. Of course this means a second
server and so more cost, but if you want a Rolls-Royce solution...
:-)
Joe.
From: Ben Souther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat as standalone
Date
: Tomcat as standalone
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:54:52 -0500
Since 90% of your app is dynamic, there is a good chance that
Tomcat as a standalone may actually be more efficient. The work
the webserver and connector has to do to pass the requests/responses
back and forth to tomcat is all
Dola,
You will find a wealth of opinions on this.
The real answer is always a big IT DEPENDS.
Because each case is different only you can really determine this.
Some things to ask:
Is there something you are doing that Tomcat can't do unless connected to
Apache?
Are the majority of your hits to
Since 90% of your app is dynamic, there is a good chance that
Tomcat as a standalone may actually be more efficient. The work
the webserver and connector has to do to pass the requests/responses
back and forth to tomcat is all in addition to what Tomcat would have to
do anyway.
I would recommend
if you are refering to the jakarta Formatting Objects Processor libraries
then yes, I use them extensively for pdf report generation. Put the FOP
jar, plus any of the XML/XSLT etc jars, in a suitable location and off you
go
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Couas [EMAIL
David Rees wrote:
On Wed, January 7, 2004 1at 1:54 am, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ?
I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen
with that
I've also been running a development machine with RH9/kernel 2.6.0 using
Tomcat 4.1.29/Apache 2.0.48/mod_jk/JDK-1.4.2_03/struts/jdbc-common
pool/Postgresql-7.4.1. No real load test yet, but haven't needed to set
the LD_KERNEL_ASSUME yet.
I'm going to start working with JMeter and see if I can
On Wed, January 7, 2004 1at 1:54 am, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ?
I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen
with that (cleaner)
could handle
(my application uses a lot of jsp pages).
Just wanted to post a follow up.
-Hakan
-Original Message-
From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:53 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:48 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java
exception
Hi all,
After realizing that the application bug wasn't a bug or my main
culprit, I
did some checking on my machine setup. I found
!
-Hakan Kilic
-Original Message-
From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:17 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java
exception
Here is a good link explaining the error:
http://www2.real-time.com/rte
I will give this a try:
I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP
pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after
the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to
happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the
Here is a good link explaining the error:
http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg02488.html
-Original Message-
From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:12 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory
-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically
is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its
)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app
Where/what is CVS?
Thanks,
John
- Original Message -
From: Peter Romianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:14 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
Take a look into the the CVS. There is an updated
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: John Echano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
We are interested in implementing SSL four our Apache Jakarta
Tomcat Server.
We are running
List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: John Echano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
We are interested in implementing
NO
need of Apache
-Original Message-From: Casstevens, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:17
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Tomcat as
standalone container
I am trying to use
Tomcat as a standalone servlet container.To do this, do I need
...hence the use of the word "standalone" ;)
-
r
-Original Message-From: Rajeshwar Rao.V
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: June 14, 2001 8:49
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
Tomcat as standalone container
NO
need of Apache
-Original Messag
The
Apache Web server is not contained in Tomcat. Tomcat is a Web server which
includes a servlet engine and a JSP engine. To use Tomcat, there is no need to
install a native Web server such as Apache or IIS or Netscape. Tomcat is able to
serve static html pages as well.
For
production
HI Tom:
try increasing the memory available to shell in which your tomcat server is
running(on popup window in case ur using defaults)
It might work
Hemant
- Original Message -
From: Tom Amiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Olivier LAUDREN wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Is there somebody using Jakarta Tomcat as standalone HTTP server?
| Witch (is/are) the most important difference(s) between this
| configuration and Apache + Tomcat?
Speed on static documents. Apache is written in some C, while Tomcat is
I have the same problem as you!
I've also tried the the URL with setting,
System.setProperty("java.protocol.handler.pkgs","com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ww
w.protocol");
I get the same error from both test and it is:
Tomcat server says:
2001-02-01 01:15:20 - Ctx( ): IOException in: R( /) Received
try https://ip.add.re.ss:8443 instead. ie has to know that you want to use
https instead of http
Filip
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 2:26 PM
Subject: Tomcat 3.2 standalone + SSL - Help please
I have followed the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Sorry for the repost - but I'm stumped on this one. I've looked in the
online docs, etc.]
How do I get a *standalone* Tomcat 3.1 server to resolve ~user requests? The
Apache 1.3.11 server handles ~user requests fine (UserDir public_html). Is
there something
33 matches
Mail list logo
