Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread Hassan Schroeder
John Martyniak wrote: I would like to be able to use the following Virtual host apps.beforedawn.com to run my app. Instead of having to include the 8080. Their is also a Webserver running on the box. So that I could run http://apps.beforedawn.com/index.jsp So my question is can this be done

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread John Martyniak
The server currently only has one IP address and several virtual hosts. Some that are served by the Web Server and some that are going to be served by Tomcat. For example on this box I would to do the following: Web Server: Serves http://www.beforedawn.com Tomcat Server:

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread Hassan Schroeder
John Martyniak wrote: The server currently only has one IP address and several virtual hosts. For example on this box I would to do the following: Web Server: Serves http://www.beforedawn.com Tomcat Server: http://apps.beforedawn.com/index.jsp http://diagnostics.beforedawn.com/index.jsp Is this

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread John Martyniak
Unfortunately this is for one of my external boxes (read have to pay ungodly sums of money to get another block of IP addresses). So if I set this up using mod_jk then I will have to do the following VirtualHost www.befordawn.com DocumentRoot /var/www/htmlbeforedawn ErrorLog

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread Hassan Schroeder
John Martyniak wrote: Unfortunately this is for one of my external boxes (read have to pay ungodly sums of money to get another block of IP addresses). Well, you only need one, eh? :-) So if I set this up using mod_jk then I will have to do the following It's been a long time since I used Apache

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

2005-01-13 Thread John Martyniak
Thanks for the help. I will try and get the mod_jk working. I think that will give me the most flexibility for the future. -John On 1/13/05 5:53 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Martyniak wrote: Unfortunately this is for one of my external boxes (read have to pay ungodly