[topbraid-users] Re: Suggestion: Default [legal] values in form fields

2015-07-31 Thread Jack Hodges
Thanks for the reply. I do not recall saying anything about dtype:numericUnion in my mails and as far as I can see qudt:numericValue is defined with an xsd:double range. That said, I can see that there are instances of qudt:numericValue that follow the conventions you and I both used, but

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Suggestion: Default [legal] values in form fields

2015-07-30 Thread Holger Knublauch
On 7/31/2015 2:23, Jack Hodges wrote: Hello Holger, Yes, mostly for the use of datatypes in properties. Well, last night and this morning the problem is with an owl:DatatypeProperty in QUDT, qudt:numericValue, whose rdfs:range is xsd:double. So it is a good example of a custom property but

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Suggestion: Default [legal] values in form fields

2015-07-30 Thread Jack Hodges
Hello Holger, Yes, mostly for the use of datatypes in properties. Well, last night and this morning the problem is with an owl:DatatypeProperty in QUDT, qudt:numericValue, whose rdfs:range is xsd:double. So it is a good example of a custom property but uses a standard datatype. I created a

[topbraid-users] Re: Suggestion: Default [legal] values in form fields

2015-07-29 Thread Jack Hodges
And for non-standard properties (such as those created by us), maybe an option to provide such a legal default value definition for others. On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 4:57:22 PM UTC-7, Jack Hodges wrote: Often times I find myself in a situation where I am putting a value into a form

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Suggestion: Default [legal] values in form fields

2015-07-29 Thread Holger Knublauch
Which datatypes do you have in mind? I assume xsd:string and any numeric datatypes are not a problem. I can imagine that xsd:date and xsd:dateTime are. What else? Also, could you give me some example of user-defined datatypes that you have created? With OWL 2 syntax? (On the more general