opbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
*Onderwerp:* Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a working group
that will take something to recommendation level. In fact,
you do not even need to be a member to
n: Friday, April 3, 2020 3:18 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a working group that will take
something to recommendation level. In fact, you do
ailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>*Namens*Irene Polikoff
*Verzonden:*Friday, April 3, 2020 3:18 PM
*Aan:*topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
*Onderwerp:*Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a
day, April 3, 2020 3:18 PM
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a working group that will take
something to recommendation level. In fact, you do not even need
rs@googlegroups.com>
> mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>
> Namens Irene Polikoff
> Verzonden: Friday, April 3, 2020 3:18 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
>
an: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a working group that will take
something to recommendation level. In fact, you do not even need to be a member
to provide evidence of the need, but only members can participate i
Any W3C member can lobby W3C for starting a working group that will take
something to recommendation level. In fact, you do not even need to be a member
to provide evidence of the need, but only members can participate in a working
group and member voting could block starting a working group.
S
Clients are asking me: what is the status of SHACL AF?
They see a work group note from summer 2017 and ask why isn't it evolving in a
proposed recommendation etc.
Is this related to potential other ideas like RIF recommendation that might be
considered in this process?
Thx for any news on this
On
Behalf Of Irene Polikoff
Sent: donderdag 1 november 2018 20:00
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Michel,
RDFS+OWL offer users ability to define a large number of model patterns. In
developing a translator, we did not have a goal t
rdag, 01 nov. 2018, 17:58
> To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [topbraid-users@googlegroups.com]
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
>
> Domains and ranges are transformed into Property Shapes as follows:
>
> rdfs:domain statements are converted to property shapes conne
]
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
Domains and ranges are transformed into Property Shapes as follows:
rdfs:domain statements are converted to property shapes connected to the
classes that are objects in {?property rdfs:domain ?object} statements. Classes
will get a rdf:type
er in which you use it
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
>
> From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On
> Behalf Of dprice
> Sent: donderdag 1 november 2018 17:17
> To: topbraid-users@googlegr
dprice
Sent: donderdag 1 november 2018 17:17
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
On 1 Nov 2018, at 14:42, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
Ok, so global cwa shapes are not
liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
>
> From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:topbraid-use
om: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of dprice
Sent: donderdag 1 november 2018 15:11
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
On 1 Nov 2018, at 13:54, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com&g
content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
>
> From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> <mailto:to
nderdag 1 november 2018 14:33
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] general shacl question
On 1 Nov 2018, at 12:02, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
I saw:
owl2shacl:rdfsRange2shClassO
> On 1 Nov 2018, at 12:02, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
> wrote:
>
> I saw:
>
> owl2shacl:rdfsRange2shClassOrDatatype
> rdf:type sh:SPARQLRule ;
> rdfs:comment "For each relevant property that has an rdfs:range, create
> sh:class or sh:datatype constraint unless it al
I saw:
owl2shacl:rdfsRange2shClassOrDatatype
rdf:type sh:SPARQLRule ;
rdfs:comment "For each relevant property that has an rdfs:range, create
sh:class or sh:datatype constraint unless it already exists (from a
restriction)." ;
this triggers some questions for me:
suppose the property is r
19 matches
Mail list logo
