On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, Erinn Clark wrote:
> * Karsten Loesing [2011:10:19 16:12 +0200]:
>> 2. Try harder to include diffs in tor-wiki-changes notifications. I
>> looked for an option that does this in Trac 0.12, but didn't find one.
>> Erinn, do you know how we could implement this change?
>
> I
* Karsten Loesing [2011:10:19 16:12 +0200]:
> 2. Try harder to include diffs in tor-wiki-changes notifications. I
> looked for an option that does this in Trac 0.12, but didn't find one.
> Erinn, do you know how we could implement this change?
I found this: http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/1660
On 10/19/11 5:50 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2011-10-19, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> 3. Delete all obsolete versions from the list, and try harder to add new
>> versions. Erinn and I tried to delete old versions and found that it's
>> safe to do so. The deleted version string in a ticket will
On 2011-10-19, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> 3. Delete all obsolete versions from the list, and try harder to add new
> versions. Erinn and I tried to delete old versions and found that it's
> safe to do so. The deleted version string in a ticket will remain the
> same, but one cannot create new tic
On 9/6/11 10:44 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Below are the results, plus some suggestions in the paragraphs starting
> with "[Suggestion: " to separate my suggestions from result summaries.
>
> Feel free to comment on the suggestions or add your own!
>
> Depending on whether this thread is going
On Monday, September 12, 2011 11:27:51 Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Well, I don't know what to do here. I think changing the component of
> 500+ tickets and adding, say, keywords for the category is a lot of work
> and will generate a lot of mail for people on tor-bugs. Is it worth it?
Is there any
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> >> 3 persons search Trac using key words and 1 person types in ticket
> >> numbers in the search field. The rest doesn't use the search feature.
> >
> > I type ticket numbers into my browser's search field, too. I don't
> > consider typing a Trac li
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/report/8
>
> 1.2 What are typical custom queries that you run?
I sometimes search on a tag if one is being used for a particular
multi-ticket task.
>
> 1.
I'm replying to Roger's email because he condensed Karsten's email, but I can
probably answer lots of Trac questions in general. Will try to do so in this
thread.
* Roger Dingledine [2011:09:12 09:51 -0400]:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> > The Version field
On 9/13/11 5:20 AM, katmagic wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:57 +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> On 9/6/11 11:01 PM, katmagic wrote:
>>> Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
>>> I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
>>> short, Tr
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:57 +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 9/6/11 11:01 PM, katmagic wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
> > I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
> > short, Trac sucks. My issues with it are as foll
On 9/12/11 3:51 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> The Component field (10, 1, 1) is used to find/filter tickets and guess
>> who's paying attention to a ticket. 1 person said that the many Tor
>> components make it hard to refer to th
On 9/6/11 11:01 PM, katmagic wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
> I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
> short, Trac sucks. My issues with it are as follows:
>
> 1. The design sucks.
You're right, it needs more green!
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> The Component field (10, 1, 1) is used to find/filter tickets and guess
> who's paying attention to a ticket. 1 person said that the many Tor
> components make it hard to refer to the software "tor" and that it's
> easier to look a
On 9/6/11 2:19 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2011-09-06, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>>> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
>>
>> From all the replies, there's 1 person using 5 reports, 2 persons using
>> 3 reports, 1 person using 2 reports, 4 persons using 1 rep
On 9/6/11 12:06 PM, Christian Fromme wrote:
>> [Suggestion: Backup and delete all reports with a component name in
>> them. The current list of Available Reports list is mostly useless for
>> newcomers who don't care much about components, but who are interested
>> in finding something to work on.
Sorry for the late reply — I haven't checked my email in a while — but
I'm replying anyway because I've some strong feelings on this issue. In
short, Trac sucks. My issues with it are as follows:
1. The design sucks.
2. There's no AJAX. Now, I know a lot of people on this list hate Web
2.0, but I
On 2011-09-06, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
>
> From all the replies, there's 1 person using 5 reports, 2 persons using
> 3 reports, 1 person using 2 reports, 4 persons using 1 report, and 5
> persons using no reports at all. T
Hi Karsten,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> First of all, thanks to the 13 people for taking part in the survey!
Thanks for your effort to make Trac life easier for everyone!
> [Suggestion: Backup and delete all reports with a component name in
> them. The current li
On 8/29/11 10:48 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> The new deadline is
>
> Sunday, September 4, 2011
>
> Dear Tor developers and volunteers who haven't responded yet: If you
> have an opinion on using Trac, please let us know!
First of all, thanks to the 13 people for taking part in the survey!
In
On 2011-08-22, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
I just used https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/report/40 (Tor
tickets by milestone) today as a starting point to find a submitted
patch that I had forgo
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:29:09PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
Basically none of them. Every once in a while I use
"{12} Tor: Active Tickets by Milestone"
> 1.2 What are typical custom queries t
On Monday, August 22, 2011 08:29:09 Karsten Loesing wrote:
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
All tickets, mine first
> 1.4 Are you subscribed to tor-bugs and/or tor-wiki-changes, and how do
> you use the mails sent to these lists
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
>
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
I don't use the reports; in the time that it takes me to confirm that
a report will actually give me the ticket that I want, I
> 1.2 What
Hi Karsten,
things I didn't answer either don't apply to me for some reason, or I
don't use them (if they're Trac fields) or I have nothing to say for
other reasons.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket quer
Thus spake Mike Perry (mikepe...@fscked.org):
> > 1.12 What features are you missing in Trac?
>
> 1. Git commit hooks.
>
> We should be able to mention "Bug #XXX" at the start
> of a commit message and have that commit get posted as a comment to
> trac w/ a link to the gitweb url for the commit.
On 8/22/11 2:29 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> At the last annual dev meeting in Waterloo we had a very productive
> discussion about managing the various channels of Tor communication:
>
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2011TorAnnualDevMeeting/Fireho
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Sean Robinson (seankrobin...@gmail.com):
>
>> > 1.10 How relevant are the following ticket statuses for you?
>> >
>> > 1.10.1 accepted
>> > 1.10.2 assigned
>>
>> Not at all
>>
>> > 1.10.3 closed
>> > 1.10.4 needs_information
>> > 1.10
Thus spake Sean Robinson (seankrobin...@gmail.com):
> > 1.10 How relevant are the following ticket statuses for you?
> >
> > 1.10.1 accepted
> > 1.10.2 assigned
>
> Not at all
>
> > 1.10.3 closed
> > 1.10.4 needs_information
> > 1.10.5 needs_review
> > 1.10.6 new
> > 1.10.7 reopened
>
> Importa
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
None
> 1.2 What are typical custom queries that you run?
Only one:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=
Thus spake Karsten Loesing (karsten.loes...@gmx.net):
> 1 Using Trac features
>
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/report/14
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/report/38
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor
> 1 Using Trac features
> 1.1 Which of the reports (stored ticket queries) do you use most often?
"{28} Open Arm Tickets", of course :P
> 1.2 What are typical custom queries that you run?
I don't since I found the search interface to be a pita. I track
tickets via email instead, flagging those I
Hi everyone!
At the last annual dev meeting in Waterloo we had a very productive
discussion about managing the various channels of Tor communication:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2011TorAnnualDevMeeting/FirehoseOutput
Related to that discussion, we should talk abou
33 matches
Mail list logo
