an invalid certificate of
course)
Let me know what you think about this idea...
Rob van der Hoeven.
http://freedomboxblog.nl
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Hi Folks,
I build a small Monitor In The Middle (MITM) proxy that can be used to
study the communication between TOR and the browser. Hope this can be
used to improve TOR.
It's small but quite powerful. Wrote an article about it on my blog:
http://freedomboxblog.nl/mitm-for-tor/
Enjoy,
Rob van
really simple and foolproof?
Did this as an experiment, wrote an article about it:
http://freedomboxblog.nl/routers-as-tor-bridges/
Rob van der Hoeven
http://freedomboxblog.nl
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https
Hi Karsten,
Over a year ago I wrote a small measuring proxy called Monitor In The
Middle. This proxy sits between the browser and Tor and examines all
HTTP traffic. Results of the measurements like response times, timeouts
etc can be viewed using an internal webserver (at http://mitm.proxy).
My
address. When the connection gets granted I am getting a response from
the socks server:
(hex data of the tcp payload)
0x05 0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
Regarding to the SOCKS specification this means that the request is
granted. But I don't understand the 0x01 in byte
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 17:31 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:34:59 +0100
Rob van der Hoeven robvanderhoe...@ziggo.nl wrote:
So, the SOCKS protocol supports redirection to another SOCKS server.
An all-zero address/port simply means: use the server/port that you
Hi folks,
I am currently working on an isolating Tor proxy for Linux users. This
proxy could be ported to Windows but this would be a lot of work. So I
wonder if it's worth the trouble. What percentage of users are
downloading the Windows version of Tor?
Regards,
Rob.
https://hoevenstein.nl
Hi folks,
During this hot summer I did some cool programming which resulted in...
Another Virtual Network Environment (avne)
AVNE is a small Linux program that runs other programs inside a virtual
network environment. All network traffic from this environment is
intercepted and forwarded to the
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 15:31 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Cute. The networking part works in a near-identical manner Orbot's
> Android VPN mode, under the hood, except they opted to use a 3rd party
> implementation (that bundles lwIP IIRC).
>
Interesting...
> Why did you write your own
On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 14:43 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> > Congestion control is used to prevent dropped segments. This can not
> > happen on the User Space <-> kernel connection of a tun interface. The
> > TCP-window flow control prevents this.
>
> Hm. Your code never shrinks the advertised
> 2. Add backend abstractions as needed to minimize module coupling. These
>should be abstractions that are friendly to in- and multi-process
>implementations. We will need at least:
>
>- publish/subscribe{,/acknowledge}.
>
> (See
>
> > I'm running Tor on a router and was wondering why the Tor daemon uses so
> > much memory.
>
> To clarify, do you mean "running a Tor client on a home Internet router"?
> What version of Tor?
>
I'm running version 0.2.5.12 (git-99d0579ff5e0349f)
The router I use is an GL-AR150 with 64MB RAM,
> > But do we really need to?
>
> No. The person is complaining about something with 16 MiB of
> non-volatile storage anyway.
>
I'm not complaining. I just care about Tor on the router. Memory usage
is a concern, and I was wondering if something can be done about it
*before* it becomes a
Hi,
I'm running Tor on a router and was wondering why the Tor daemon uses so
much memory. Did a pmap:
pmap `pidof tor`
And got the following result:
1703: /usr/sbin/tor --PidFile /var/run/tor.pid
0040 1024K r-x-- /usr/sbin/tor
0050f000 4K r /usr/sbin/tor
0051 20K
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:29 -0700, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Hi Rob. I suppose it's possible arm is having a refresh issue but
> can't say there's a known bug around that. To double check try running
> tor-prompt and giving it 'GETINFO circuit-status'...
Hi Damian,
If I run tor-prompt and ARM side
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:49 -0700, Damian Johnson wrote:
> > If I run tor-prompt and ARM side by side, the tor-prompt results are
> > updated when I do a GETINFO circuit-status. The ARM circuits page only
> > updates after a restart.
>
> Gotcha. Definitely a refresh bug then. Sorry about that. :(
Hi folks,
I'm currently thinking about a new scalable network architecture for
Tor. In order to get some idea about the performance of this
architecture I need some data about the CREATE/CREATED handshake. This
handshake involves PK encryption which is of course time consuming, and
this probably
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 13:57 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:37:24 +0200
> Rob van der Hoeven <robvanderhoe...@ziggo.nl> wrote:
> > 2) The average CPU-time it takes to perform a CREATE/CREATED
> > handshake.
>
> This "depends" entirely
Hi folks,
I'm on a quest to find the average circuit-creation rate of clients. I
looked in path-spec.txt to find an answer, but it wasn't there. So I
thought: lets take some measurements using ARM. This got me some strange
results. I start ARM, do some browsing, and close my browser. During the
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 22:30 +1100, teor wrote:
> > On 17 Oct 2016, at 22:04, Rob van der Hoeven <robvanderhoe...@ziggo.nl>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm on a quest to find the average circuit-creation rate of clients. I
> > looked i
20 matches
Mail list logo
