> On 27 Jun 2018, at 00:34, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
>> On 6/26/18 10:29, Nagaev Boris wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Matt Traudt wrote:
On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote:
I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
source code) the number of
924B24AFA7F075D059E8EEB284CC400B33D3D036
Will be stable for the foreseeable future and is available as a fallback if
needed.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 12:41 Colin Childs wrote:
> Hello Tor Relay Operators,
>
> Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror?
> Will it have the same add
Hello Tor Relay Operators,
Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror?
Will it have the same address and port for the next 2 years?
Just reply to this email with your relay's fingerprint.
If your relay is on the current list, you don't need to do anything.
If you're asking:
Q:
On 6/26/18 10:52, dave levi wrote:
> first, Thank you all for you answers and help.
> let me make it a bit harder. now, im running a relay which is Guard and
> Exit relays.
> i have defined in my relay(the server that's running the relay in /torrc
> file) to be "AllowSingleHopExits 1"
> and set in
i can't use it(Tor-browser) to visit site(regular site or onion site
> too). so im thinking maybe the Tor-network have protected from users who
> are using 1 hop?
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipe
On 6/26/18 10:29, Nagaev Boris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Matt Traudt wrote:
>> On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote:
>>> I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
>>> source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it
>>> work's fine(slow
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:27:29AM -0400, Matt Traudt wrote:
> Even before the DoS mitigation stuff, relays wouldn't allow themselves
> to be used as the only hop in a circuit. Apparently this affects onion
> service circuits too.
Right. Relays protect themselves from being used as one-hop proxies
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Matt Traudt wrote:
> On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote:
>> I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
>> source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it
>> work's fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only
On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote:
> I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
> source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it
> work's fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only 2 hop's its
> still works great. but, when i'm setting on
On 2018-06-26 16:16:46, "dave levi" wrote:
I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from
the source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it
work's fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only 2 hop's
its still works great. but, when i'm sett
I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it work's
fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only 2 hop's its still
works great. but, when i'm setting only 1 hop, i can open the Tor-browser
but i
Hello,
If you select "Do you need IPv6 addresses - Yes", it always results in an
error "There aren't any bridges available". No matter if choosing obfs4 or
none for the pluggable transport. Is that thing working?
There should be at least one available (with obfs4, too), or at least I was
under im
12 matches
Mail list logo
