Re: [tor-relays] Actions required after update?

won't want to replace their existing torrc, unless they want to start configuring their relay from scratch again. The changes in the default torrc are aimed at new operators. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A

Re: [tor-relays] keypair issue after backing up relay

html <https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-November/008217.html> Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] Abuse messages from IPs marked as rejected in the exit policy

address, or an IPv6 address to contact them.) A non-tor process on the relay? Can you post the ExitPolicy from your torrc? I can only see the one on globe, and I'd like to make sure they match. (But it's well structured: reject …; accept …; reject *:*; so I don't force any issues.) Tim Tim Wilson-Brow

Re: [tor-relays] Tor exit node companion

r-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message s

Re: [tor-relays] unlisted exit relay

ble to research the nodes > you are using. Multihomed exits using a different OutboundBindAddress from their Address (IPv4) or ORPort (IPv6). The OR traffic comes in on one address, and the Exit traffic leaves on another. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor

Re: [tor-relays] webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet

. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@li

Re: [tor-relays] Faravahar messing with my IP address

> On 9 Nov 2015, at 23:02, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 Nov 2015, at 20:45, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu > <mailto:a...@mit.edu>> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:04:55PM +1100, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >>> Subsequent

Re: [tor-relays] Limiting Bandwidth

atically suspending. Any ideas? AccountingMax/AccountingRule: use all the bandwidth as fast as your connection will support, then hibernate the relay using BandwidthRate/BandwidthBurst: use all the bandwidth at a maximum set rate Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968

Re: [tor-relays] TorFlow

on-aware secure protocols are hard. When I looked up the local servers of some big US companies, they were all listed as being on the US west coast, rather than the Australian east coast. That's a pretty big inaccuracy. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor

Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay seized by police

le signing key. There is also work on key revocation, where a key can be cancelled in the event of compromise. See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13642 <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13642> for more details. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gm

Re: [tor-relays] TorFlow

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 22:57, mick <m...@rlogin.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:30:53 +1100 > Tim Wilson-Brown - teor <teor2...@gmail.com> allegedly wrote: > >> >>> On 10 Nov 2015, at 11:05, I <beatthebasta...@inbox.com> wrote: >>

Re: [tor-relays] TorFlow

> On 11 Nov 2015, at 12:15, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > On 11/10/2015 04:19 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 09:44, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0...@riseup.net> wrote: > >>> What jumped o

Re: [tor-relays] TorFlow

rnational bandwidth is very expensive in the antipodes. There are very few providers with unlimited or terabyte data plans. Australia just brought in a mandatory data retention law in April/October 2015. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR

Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay seized by police

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 11:28, Tim Sammut <t...@teamsammut.com> wrote: > > Hi Tim, everyone. > > On 11/06/2015 08:41 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> The directory authorities are generally more concerned when they >> *don't* stop it afterwards, and

Re: [tor-relays] Faravahar messing with my IP address

ress-Is: 180.200.153.214 Content-Encoding: identity The second download with exactly the same URL did not contain [C|X]ontent-Length, Connection, or ETag. It's probably worth mentioning that similar queries to other directory authorities do not show the same behaviour. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) t

Re: [tor-relays] Faravahar messing with my IP address

On 9 Nov 2015, at 20:45, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu <mailto:a...@mit.edu>> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:04:55PM +1100, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> Subsequent queries get the same IP address for several tens of seconds >> afterwards. > > Woah.

Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay seized by police

sts.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> > > ___ > tor-relays ma

Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay seized by police

t;https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> > > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (t

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily format

s. (I don't think that ticket has moved much, it probably needs to be turned into a proposal, and then have community consensus, before being implemented.) Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

Re: [tor-relays] DirAuths are blocking my node on Amazon EC2. Why?

riments on Tor's DHT often try to discover hidden service addresses. This is considered an attack, and relays that perform this attack are currently being blocked. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F s

Re: [tor-relays] tor relay + bridge

IPv4 address to bootstrap. Bridges and relays that have both an IPv4 and IPv6 address can support IPv6-only clients. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Messa

Re: [tor-relays] Free Domain for Tor Nodes

> On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:55, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 26 Oct 2015, at 09:27, NOC <noc@babylon.network> wrote: >> >> Usually the Contact Info is obfuscated is some way. Tor Weather >> handles grabbing these just fine too so shoul

Re: [tor-relays] Faravahar messing with my IP address

> On 23 Oct 2015, at 09:30, Green Dream wrote: > > I see this from time to time as well. Here's another example: > > Oct 17 23:02:44.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from 52.64.142.121 > to [CORRECT IP]; rebuilding descriptor (source: 86.59.21.38). > >

Re: [tor-relays] webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 07:41, Josef Stautner wrote: > > I also ask my hoster for the mail addresses of the abuse reporter and > write a little statement why he got attacked and what tor is and why I > running a relay. Mostly the abuse reports from WebIron reports about >

Re: [tor-relays] Optimizing TOR Relay

> On 22 Oct 2015, at 01:42, 12xBTM <12x...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here's your problem: > >> On 21.10.15 8:20, Volker Mink wrote: >> Upstream 5 MBps Tor bandwidth usage is more or less symmetric upstream / downstream. So you'll only ever get 5Mbps or less of tor traffic out of this connection.

Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy reject fails

> On 20 Oct 2015, at 08:21, spiros_spi...@freemail.gr wrote: > > > Hi Josef, > ... > > Also, I don't know if this make any difference at all, but I also put port in > my torrc like this : > > ExitPolicy reject 195.113.0.0/16:* #comment here An IP address/mask with no port specifier is

Re: [tor-relays] Tools for managing multiple relays

oing Tor version upgrades this way, but I’ve found that it's best to do them manually but regularly, then check they worked. Others might have better experiences with automated Tor upgrades. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9

Re: [tor-relays] Obfsproxy OSX help

e this doesn’t happen. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ t

Re: [tor-relays] (no subject)

s mailing >>>>> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <0xDD79757F.asc>___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://li

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node with Onion Pi

ridge or non-exit relay; or run it out of a data centre; or explain Tor to them in advance. If your greatest concern is saturating your link, try it with the device you have, then upgrade if necessary. If neither is a concern, go for it! Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot co

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

about making Tor aware of kernel buffers. (Currently, Tor doesn’t know what happens after it writes data to the socket.) http://www.robgjansen.com/publications/kist-sec2014.pdf <http://www.robgjansen.com/publications/kist-sec2014.pdf> Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot

Re: [tor-relays] Onionoo down?

; is up, but it appears that the backend is not working: HTTP ERROR 500 Problem accessing /uptime. Reason: Server Error Powered by Jetty:// In the meantime, please try https://globe.thecthulhu.com/ <https://globe.thecthulhu.com/> Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

> On 1 Oct 2015, at 14:48, Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor > <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> How did you set this limit? What did you write in your torrc file? >> >

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

> On 1 Oct 2015, at 15:03, Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor > <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 1 Oct 2015, at 14:48, Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren@gmail.com> wrote: >> >

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

oject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

> On 1 Oct 2015, at 15:22, Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor > <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can you help me understand what you think the bug is? > > Relay is assigned a co

Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd

ger > > > > ___ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______ > tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

t that we update the code? I’m not sure how much this actually helps, as, once deployed to all relays, the consensus weights for all relays that set a *Bandwidth* options would come out slightly lower, and other relays without *Bandwidth* options set would take up the load.) I’ve updated https://tra

Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd

s at what's going wrong for you. :) > > > > Thanks! > > --Roger > > > > ___ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relay

Re: [tor-relays] doesn't Tor 0.2.7.3_rc like IPv6 ?

nection to >> tor.noreply.org. > > Could this be something related to > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17149 > <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17149> Yes, that bug will most likely discard/delete your entire exit policy, and cau

Re: [tor-relays] Flipping from guard and back again

at the cause is here, and whether the relay’s Guard flag is in some kind of bandwidth-driven loop. Have you looked at the bwauth votes for your relay? * Your uptime is ok (for the last month). * There could be other factors. Give it a week or so to stabilise, or, alternately, limit the bandwidth to stop i

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

be to allow exits > from their network, thereby increasing the capacity of non-government nodes. > The irony. Unless they think there’s a significant chance *you’re* a US government agent. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD080

Re: [tor-relays] Obfsproxy OSX help

ions> , or if it could have been added long ago. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail _

Re: [tor-relays] Tor is starting without the -f /etc/tor/torrc option

of a recent package update, as I experienced exactly the same issue on Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS (trusty), and tor was using /etc/tor/torrc a few weeks ago. (Also, Billy, please don’t top-post, it makes the thread of conversation hard to read. Instead, post after the paragraph you’re replying to, and e

Re: [tor-relays] Obfsproxy OSX help

> On 22 Sep 2015, at 12:00, Geoff Down <geoffd...@fastmail.net> wrote: > > Hi Tim > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015, at 01:40 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> >>> On 21 Sep 2015, at 19:59, Geoff Down <geoffd...@fastmail.net> wrote: >>> >>&

Re: [tor-relays] Preventing wp-admin related abuse report

before any lines that allow that port - right at the start of the exit policy is best. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPG

Re: [tor-relays] Botnet

to ask your ISP what IPs or ports are generating the complaints. Tim (teor) Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 vs IPv4 exit policies

___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930

Re: [tor-relays] I.P. being Blocked?

forwarded message: From: teor teor2...@gmail.com Subject: Tor Blocklist Confusion Date: 10 August 2015 13:42:26 AEST To: m...@dan.me.uk Hi Dan, It appears that a number of website operators are using the .tor.dan.me.uk blocklist to block website access from the entire Tor network

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

presently in the GIT repository. I might contribute a new Torstatus, but if not me someone surely will. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] pinning relay keys to IPs (or not)

Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] The ultimate DMCA culprit

/movie_studio_finds_pirated_jurassic_world_on_localhost/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/23/movie_studio_finds_pirated_jurassic_world_on_localhost/ Robert Hi Robert, This might be more suited to tor-talk@ Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

Linux), the least we can do is document how to set it up correctly / securely, and any tradeoffs involved in using Windows vs Linux. Tim -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of teor Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:08 AM

Re: [tor-relays] [Relay] Hibernation Reset

On 7/21/2015 11:09 AM, teor wrote: On 21 Jul 2015, at 03:12 , Tor Operator t...@coldnorthadmin.com mailto:t...@coldnorthadmin.com wrote: Hi gents, I rencetly had one of my relay fall into hibernation. It seems that simply restarting the service doesn't change the hibernation status

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay in the Netherlands

an exit). Also, some blacklist operators/users even blacklist non-exit relay IPs (Apple's forums are the most obvious ones to me, but I'm sure there are more). Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot

Re: [tor-relays] [Relay] Hibernation Reset

way to do it. Why not edit or remove the accounting limits in the torrc? We might need a little more context: why are the accounting limits set lower than you want? What exactly are you trying to achieve? Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Policy Information != ExitPolicy reject

it contains? Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

(web ports, other ports), but I'd prefer to provide the list of ports in a detail page, and let the analyst do their own triage. But if we only have one page, perhaps the split is worthwhile. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

On 7 Jul 2015, at 17:01 , josh@tucker.wales wrote: On 7 Jul 2015, at 07:48, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote: On 07/07/15 03:45, teor wrote: On 7 Jul 2015, at 09:46 , josh@tucker.wales wrote: From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's important

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

that. But guaranteed +/- 10 hour fuzzy matching in any results from any timezone is a pretty good start. (And there's even greater leeway if your timezone is close to UTC, or the time you're searching for is close to midday UTC.) Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

side, and the US Minor Outlying Islands on the other. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed

[tor-relays] Running a Relay behind a NAT (was Re: unflagged BAD EXIT nodes)

src/tools/tor-fw-helper, which supports NAT-PMP and UPnP. It can be configured via the torrc option: PortForwarding 1 Or, you can configure your NAT box to forward ports yourself. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] Running a Relay behind a NAT (was Re: unflagged BAD EXIT nodes)

On 5 Jul 2015, at 11:37 , teor teor2...@gmail.com wrote: Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:34:45 -0400 From: Ben Serebin b...@reefsolutions.com Subject: Re: [tor-relays] unflagged BAD EXIT nodes ?I'll hijack the response I'm a sysadmin, an unloved Windows one. My unwanted $0.02

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

of the Tor network is Linux, including BSDs/OS X and others avoids a monoculture, but Windows is considered less secure) teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7

Re: [tor-relays] OpenBSD: tor rc script: don't kill unrelated tor instances (patch)

of an option in the configuration file, and not replace it at all: you might want to say on the command line that you want no SOCKSPorts at all. To do that, prefix the option name with a forward slash. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay is restarting every minute

software? Drop it? (I only ask because a hardware fault can trigger certain kinds of interrupts.) Does ATT block certain types of connections? teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265

Re: [tor-relays] Recommendation: Upgrade your OpenSSL! (Nick Mathewson)

and 0.9.8 will cease on 31st December 2015. No security updates for these releases will be provided after that date. Users of these releases are advised to upgrade. See the second-last section in https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150611.txt teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https

Re: [tor-relays] BWAUTH weightings too volatile. . .twitchy

Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:37:01 -0400 From: starlight.201...@binnacle.cx At 04:12 6/7/2015 +1000, teor wrote: Please let me know how you go - the 0.2.6.x series should also be relatively ASAN and UBSAN clean, as Tor has been tested with them since late 2014. I've run 0.2.4.x and 0.2.5

Re: [tor-relays] BWAUTH weightings too volatile. . .twitchy

know how you go - the 0.2.6.x series should also be relatively ASAN and UBSAN clean, as Tor has been tested with them since late 2014. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265

[tor-relays] Updated: Running Tor When OS X Boots

on Vidalia, tor 0.2.2, and OS X 10.6 or 10.7. If you're running Tor on OS X, please try these instructions, fix any mistakes, and add missing steps. In particular, we've moved away from Vidalia to nyx (arm), so the nyx sections could do with some more detail. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp

Re: [tor-relays] How to use our own TOR relay as entry node for local network hosts

* As a precaution, if you ever reconfigure a relay Tor node as a bridge Tor node, please delete the keys so it appears as a new bridge in BridgeDB. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930

Re: [tor-relays] Auto-detect and enable IPv6 // Re: Please enable IPv6 on your relay!

-side changes without them. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] Improving Node Connection Testing

- but this is perhaps a job for something more like Ooniprobe? teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] Multi-core Support

(utilizing up to four cores, not just two). This was suggested in https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13414 But the concern was that any increase to 2 relays per IP would make it much easier for sybil attacks. Perhaps we could try an increase to 3 or 4 per IP? teor teor2345 at gmail dot

Re: [tor-relays] Multi-core Support

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7572 teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [tor-relays] T-shirts and Confirming Relay Control

. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] T-shirts and Confirming Relay Control

can fallback on pkcs#1 v1.5 signatures. OS X still ships with OpenSSL 0.9.8 by default. But Darwin is such a small fraction of the network, and it's less likely that a Darwin server would push enough data to get a t-shirt unless it had an OpenSSL version with aes-ni. teor teor2345 at gmail

Re: [tor-relays] running multiple bridges on one machine?

, tor multithreading only offloads some of the work.) There is currently a limit of two instances per IP address, but if you have 2 IP addresses, you could potentially run 4 instances, one instance per processor. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] Undiagnosable Crashes in Relays

On 26 Mar 2015, at 12:38 , teor teor2...@gmail.com wrote: Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:21:50 +0800 From: Vincent Yu v...@v-yu.com On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:26 PM, skyhighatrist skyhighatr...@tfwno.gf wrote: I am wondering if anyone has had their relay randomly crash in the past week

Re: [tor-relays] Manual Relay Guide for OS X

, address, /etc/hosts file, etc. If you're still having trouble try hopping on IRC. ### teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR C3C57B23 349825DE 929A1DEF C3531C25 A32287ED signature.asc Description: Message

Re: [tor-relays] Unreachable ORPort - Potential ISP block?

external IP. Does your tor instance download the directory, and correctly guess the external IP? teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR C3C57B23 349825DE 929A1DEF C3531C25

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 HiddenServicePort

connections? -- Does the server refuse connections? -- Is the server accepting the connection but failing to respond? -- (You'll need to look in the client and hidden service logs to find out.) That should be more than enough :-) teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com

Re: [tor-relays] Simulate High Tor Load

the case (clarification or patches gladly accepted). teor Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:18:01 +0100 From: webmaster webmas...@defcon-cc.dyndns.org Hi Julien, thats exactly the setup I'm actually using. I use my relay as a client. From my point of view it seems that the relay is used as a entry

Re: [tor-relays] Reminder: don't run transparent proxies at exits

, it's less likely to be specifically targeted by law enforcement. In my opinion, if you use HTTP over the internet, you are essentially consenting to caching, inspection, or worse. And most people know that by now. And if you use HTTP over Tor, you should be much more aware of this. teor teor2345

Re: [tor-relays] OT: folding@home

Some thoughts on the security of crowdsourced computing: Installing additional software increases the attack surface of your relay, even more so when the new software access the network. (Not to mention any additional libraries.) There is also the issue of the security of automatic updates to

Re: [tor-relays] Platform diversity in Tor network [was: OpenBSD doc/TUNING]

? Or are you hoping we will increase the consensus parameter to 3? I could revive that suggestion, by the way - it stalled as trac #13414 due to concerns with making sybils easier. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13414 Maybe we could try for 3 per IP? teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp

Re: [tor-relays] Fast Exit Node Operators - ISP in US

.) Why not use 32GB x 31 days = 992GB, or 31GB x 31 days = 961GB ? teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp://pgp.mit.edu/ https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 http://0bin.net/paste/Mu92kPyphK0bqmbA#Zvt3gzMrSCAwDN6GKsUk7Q8G-eG+Y+BLpe7wtmU66Mx signature.asc Description: Message signed

Re: [tor-relays] Slow relay speeds for Australian geographic location(s)

for the in depth post, Teor. I had read the lifecycle article but was concerned when people were posting that their relay was soaking all their bandwidth after a day or two. This makes sense now, given the oversupply and location. It was also worrying when the advertised bandwidth was fluctuating so much

Re: [tor-relays] Question on running bridge nodes

On 12 Oct 2014, at 19:30 , Tor externet co uk t...@externet.co.uk wrote: On 2014-10-12 02:04, teor wrote: On 12 Oct 2014, at 09:32 , tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote: Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:25:47 +0100 From: Tor externet co uk t...@externet.co.uk To: tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Few questions about relaying

perform best when given a rate slightly under the capacity of the link. teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp://pgp.mit.edu/ https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 http://0bin.net/paste/Mu92kPyphK0bqmbA#Zvt3gzMrSCAwDN6GKsUk7Q8G-eG+Y+BLpe7wtmU66Mx On 12 Oct 2014, at 01:22 , tor-relays-requ

Re: [tor-relays] Slow relay speeds for Australian geographic location(s)

on 9001, and see if it experiences the same issues after a few weeks. You could also try paste-binning your torrc, and we'll look for specifics. [-1]: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay [0]: https://atlas.torproject.org/ teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp://pgp.mit.edu/ https

Re: [tor-relays] Question on running bridge nodes

to make sure at least 1 stays up at all times (2 for reliability), which would favour throttling. teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp://pgp.mit.edu/ https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 http://0bin.net/paste/Mu92kPyphK0bqmbA#Zvt3gzMrSCAwDN6GKsUk7Q8G-eG+Y+BLpe7wtmU66Mx signature.asc

<    5   6   7   8   9   10