Ahh that will be the WHS console. It does behave as you describe but
(to my knowledge) only for Windows updates, not updates to plugins such
as Squeezebox server. It would be nice if it did though.
It does. At least it should. If you're on 7.5.0, then you might see it in a few
days...
--
Hi,
A rapid test between my SB Touch and my CA 640V2 CD player (CD ripped
with EAC to flac and test by switching CD/Touch source) . The CA 640 v2
is the clear winner, better definition, accuracy...
SB touch should be better than duet with theoretically a better DAC,
powerfull cpu (better to
enestu;554639 Wrote:
Hi,
A rapid test between my SB Touch and my CA 640V2 CD player (CD ripped
with EAC to flac and test by switching CD/Touch source) . The CA 640 v2
is the clear winner, better definition, accuracy...
SB touch should be better than duet with theoretically a better DAC,
@peterw, can you provide a little more detail on the import process you
mention? Would I save that line of code as a txt file, e.g.
EnableStatusFirst.txt and then import it somewhere in the Settings
interface in SBS? Also, would {plugin.StatusFirst::disabled:1}
accomplish the opposite?
tomasito;554045 Wrote:
Hello,
I posted this inquiry in the audiophile section, didn't get any
comments on it. Maybe I'll try my luck in this forum. Perhaps somebody
in this forum might want to share their comments about it.
Here it is:
I have a decent stereo system that I hook up the
Apesbrain;554665 Wrote:
@ralphpny, search on the Radio does seem easier/faster than the stock
search on the Classic, but I think I'm going to miss LazySearch!
Thanks again if you reply.
The semi-graphical method of finding music on the Touch works great if
one has the Touch located so that
ralphpnj;554671 Wrote:
I would rank the speed and convenience of the various search methods
available as follows:
1 - Lazy Search
2 - Web interface (but one needs a computer in the listening area)
3 - Touch remote/screen combination
4 - Controller
5 - Squeezebox/Transporter remote
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79360
Question:
erland;554696 Wrote:
My ranking would be the same but I would also like to add iPeng and
maybe some of the other third party iPhone apps around 2.
Searching on a Touch/Radio controlled with IR remote doesn't work very
good at the moment, Lazy Search is a must to make IR remote searing
Anyone?
--
crazyj
crazyj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77325
___
Touch
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79360
Question:
JohnSwenson, JJZolx: thanks for your replies.
No, I'm not using an external DAC, just the RCA analogue outputs to my
amp.
Re. the sample rate, the 'source' change was from a 128kb/s AAC+
internet radio stream to 24b/88.2kHz FLAC.
It's a bit more than a faint tick, rather a couple of
Aha, yes there is a click on the analog outs when changing sample rates.
The intensity seems to be constant, so if you run the volume at full and
run into a preamp the clicks are barely audible. BUT if you run directly
into a high gain amp and have the Touch volume set low, the clicks are
quite
Hi all,
thank you for letting me be here.
I just bought the Squeezebox Touch and the Ipod Touch 64 GB.
I have IPENG on my Ipod Touch and now I would like to control the
Squeezebox Touch with my Ipod Touch.
How do have to configure the Ipod Touch???
Does the Squeezebox Touch have to be
Hello and Welcome to the Forum!
You will just need to setup iPeng to work with your wireless network.
Follow the guide in iPeng so it sees your wireless network then pick
the Touch from the available Squeezebox devices. iPeng is a great
companion for use with Squeezebox. There is also an iPeng '
nicolas75;554174 Wrote:
Thanks, didn't knew if there was a bug or not.
I'll wait for 7.5.1
Updated 7.5.1
MySB favorites are available.
Problem solved ...
--
nicolas75
nicolas75's Profile:
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79360
Question:
The SB Touch cannot talk directly to the iTouch. You need a wireless
access point in the picture somewhere. The access point doesn't have to
be connected to the internet but it does have to be there. It sets up
the wireless infrastructure that both Touches connect to.
The access point is where
ozzymilton;554723 Wrote:
I too cannot get my SQ Touch to display the album art that shows on my
itunes.
I rescanned and that helped in some other areas, but I still cant see
the album art.
My music is all in the apple lossless format.
I've not used the iTunes support in SBS but I have a
Thorsten,
Is the HD already connected to the SB touch? If not, the server on the
touch will not yet be running so you could only control the SB through
MySqueezebox.com to which it will connect if you select Internet Radio
or MyApps on the SB.
You can select the music source (touch with it's HD
Suppose I was considering a Touch...but I'm happy with my Classic SB.
But all things being equal, no other changes being made in my setup,
would I notice improved sound quality with the Touch?
--
mmduf
mmduf's Profile:
On 06/14/2010 11:14 PM, mmduf wrote:
Suppose I was considering a Touch...but I'm happy with my Classic SB.
But all things being equal, no other changes being made in my setup,
would I notice improved sound quality with the Touch?
How good is the rest of your stereo?
How picky are you about
Good questions, all. Just asking if I would notice an obvious
improvement in sound. Not an audiophile, but I like the sound of my
stereo. I guess I'm trying to justify it, because I'm intrigued by the
other features of the Touch, but in the end it's all about the sound,
right?
So does anyone
mmduf;554825 Wrote:
So does anyone think there's a noticeable improvement in sound since
upgrading to the Touch?
There are people that notice a huge difference and there are people
like myself that barely would be able to hear the difference in a bind
test. It all depends on what other
Thank you.
--
luxendel
luxendel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38705
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79667
___
Hello Pete,
very informative feedback.
Highly appreciated
--
tomasito
tomasito's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34926
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79576
On 06/14/2010 11:45 PM, mmduf wrote:
I guess I'm trying to justify it, because I'm intrigued by the
other features of the Touch, but in the end it's all about the sound,
right?
I don't think so at all. The Touch UI is great, if its within arm reach.
I really like it. I've been a happy
27 matches
Mail list logo
