[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

and net.core.wmem_maxvalues equally until the routing socket reports: No buffer space available message no longer showed up. [1] 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.4+20150820lp1481388~2 https://launchpad.net/~eric-desrochers-z/+archive/ubuntu/lp1481388 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Patch removed: "debdiff for precise" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4452908/+files/lp1481388_precise.debdiff ** Patch removed: "debdiff for trusty"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Hi Mathew, I have the knowledge of the code, I will rebase the debdiffs for V/T/P Note: I checked and Xenial has the patch already. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Here is the rebase debdiff for Trusty ** Patch added: "Rebase Trusty debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508494/+files/lp1481388_rebase_trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Here is the rebase debdiff for Precise ** Patch added: "Rebase Precise debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508496/+files/lp1481388_rebase_precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Here is the rebase debdiff for Vivid ** Patch added: "Rebase Vivid debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508498/+files/lp1481388_rebase_vivid.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Good evening Chris, This bug has been brought to my attention by someone in the community. Unfortunately, I never had a confirmation from him if the fix solve his issue or not... but as state in comment #5 & #11, I've been able to reproduce the problem and make sure it addressed the situation.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Good evening Mathew, Does it mean I need to re-do the debdiffs ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347788] Re: find crashed when current working directory is not readable and -exec or -execdir used

Upstream bug: --- bug #44078: Find fails if executed from a directory on which the user has no list permissions and exec is an option used[1] --- Fix: --- commit 7dc70069a3095a42eadb22b24cb9260c243aff8f Author: James Youngman Date: Sat Apr 10 17:15:01 2010 +0100 Exec predicates

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root Status in NTP: Fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Eric Desrochers (eric-desrochers-z) ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Eric Desrochers (eric-desrochers-z) ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root Status in ntp package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for precise ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * User experienced repeated segfaults at the same instruction pointer + + i/o error on routing socket No buffer space available - disabling + segfault at 31 ip 0031 sp 79f11788 error 14 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root Status in ntp package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for precise ** Patch added: debdiff for precise https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4452908/+files/lp1481388_precise.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

I also noticed the situation can be reproduced at boot if the value of net.core.rmem_default is too low. I reproduced it by only lowering the net.core.rmem_default = 2000 value with 6 network interface at boot. ntpd[851]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for trusty ** Patch added: 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4453392/+files/lp1481388_trusty.debdiff ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Low => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for Vivid ** Patch added: "debdiff for Vivid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4455714/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for wily ** Patch added: "debdiff for wily" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4456187/+files/lp1481388_wily.debdiff ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

debdiff for vivid ** Patch added: "debdiff for vivid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4456186/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Patch removed: "debdiff for Vivid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4455714/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

Simon, you may want to add a few ethernet interfaces and static routes. I was able to reproduce it with ~6 network interface. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481388] Re: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388 Title: NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378 Title: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

The user that originally reported the issue on Ubuntu package have tested a "Test package". The "Test package" I have builded can be found here : ppa:slashd/fix1593378. Users feedback : "We tested the hotfix and looks like it works, the sldap on the CIC with the fix didn`t crash." Eric **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Description changed: + [Impact] + + The effect of the bug on users is that the program (slapd) terminated + with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault when ldapsearch tries to query + using multiple language tags. + + + GDB output: + ... + Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/slapd -h ldap://:389

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

Here's the debdiff for Trusty which is a cherry picked patch from upstream VCS. ** Patch added: "lp1593378_trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1593378/+attachment/4687422/+files/lp1593378_trusty.debdiff ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] [NEW] crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

Public bug reported: Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/slapd -h ldap://:389 ldap://:389/ ldapi:/// -g o'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 __strncasecmp_l_ssse3 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S:210 210 ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S: No

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378 Title: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

I think this upstream commit could be a possible candidate to fix that issue : commit 0659ef45d486b5daaafc020cb67b561a8029036d Author: Howard Chu Date: Thu Sep 18 00:33:33 2014 +0100 ITS#7941 fix for repeated tags Make sure ntags isn't incremented if we're

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

line #272 checks for duplication and jumps to the done label (line #294) when a duplicate is found. The code increases 'ntags' without filling in the tags struct with values. In later iterations this could lead to copying and using uninitialised memory. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378 Title: cr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

In frame #1 (gdb) p tags $2 = {{bv_len = 7, bv_val = 0x7f672c104866 "lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;la"...}, {bv_len = 9,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Tags added: sts ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1555760] Re: Too many levels of symbolic links /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

To continue my previous comment... It is reproducible with : binfmt-support (2.1.6-1) systemd(229-4ubuntu6) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555760

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1555760] Re: Too many levels of symbolic links /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

I don't have the error "Too many levels of symbolic links" when doing an "ls" command but I do have a problem using "df" on Xenial after installing Openstack with lxd using "conjure-up" "df" works fine, but after a reboot, it hangs. A "strace df" shows that it hangs at doing : ..

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Tags removed: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378 Title: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

It has been brought to my attention ... -- I confirm that the proposed testfix package resolved the issue on Trusty. The test were made on test machines where the client had an iptable postrouting nat forcing the source port to be under 123. - ntpdate command performed on the client machine was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

I confirmed the package"4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9" solved the problem in Ubuntu Precise NTP Version : 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 With no IPTABLES rule ==> Working $ ntpdate x.x.x.x 11 Feb 16:15:19 ntpdate[1243]: adjust time server x.x.x.x offset 0.190571 sec With IPTABLES rule ==> Not working $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479652 Title: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

I confirmed the package "4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2" solve the bug in Ubuntu Wily # With port <123 using ntpdate (without patch) 11 Feb 20:30:09 ntpdate[2348]: no server suitable for synchronization found # With port <123 using ntpdate (including patch) 11 Feb 20:32:18 ntpdate[3243]: adjust time

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Description changed: [Impact] If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment due to NAT. [Test Case] The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting nat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Description changed: [Impact] If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment due to NAT. [Test Case] The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting nat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

I have build a test package for the community to validate it solve the bug before starting the SRU process [1]. The goal of this testfix is only to confirm that this solve the bug and it is not a final solution. Here's what has been brought to my attention about the test package I have

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479652 Title: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus Status in NTP: Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

Patch -- Distribution : Trusty (14.04) Package version : ntp_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.8 -- Note: kick-d is currently working on a merge for Xenial, including this patch. I'm including the .debdiffs for the other distributions (W/T/P) for once the merge for Xenial will be completed. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Description changed: + [Impact] + + If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the packet is silently ignored by ntpd. + This is occurring in our environment due to NAT. + + [Test Case] + + The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting + nat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

Patch -- Distribution : Wily (15.10) Package version : 4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2 -- ** Patch added: "wily_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1479652/+attachment/4556354/+files/lp1479652_wily_8.2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

Patch -- Distribution : Precise (12.04) Package version : 4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9 -- ** Patch added: "precise_ntp_4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1479652/+attachment/4556380/+files/lp1479652_precise_3.9.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] Re: [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1565567] Re: segv in sudo_getgrgid

The segmentation fault[1] is due to a NULL pointer dereference[2] at : sudo-1.8.16/plugins/sudoers/pwutil.c[3] [1] Core was generated by `sudo bash'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7fa01c0a6944 in sudo_getgrgid (gid=7241) at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378 Title: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593378] Re: crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags

The following has been brought to my attention by a user : "I got verification from the system test, the fix solves the ldap issue. Thank you for the fix" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Quick note saying that the work is still in progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176046 Title: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

As per a irc conversation with the SRU team (apw), The existing krb5 (1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu1) has a regressing ADT test so it stuck in -proposed. Thus, preventing krb5 (1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2) to land in -proposed. SRU team are looking at this as we speak. - Eric -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

** Description changed: == SRU JUSTIFICATION == [Impact] * Chrome (and other things) crash (segfault) when Kerberos fails to authenticate. Thread 22 "Chrome_IOThread" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffdd687700 (LWP 14851)]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

@dwmw2, @Andrew Jorgensen, or anyone else affected by this bug. As you may have notice, there is currently a call for testing a proposed version of the source package "krb5". This is the last step before the package make its way into xenial- updates (final destination) Could you please try the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

Great thanks Andrew ! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648901 Title: SPNEGO crash on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

** Tags removed: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648901 Title: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure Status in krb5 package in Ubuntu: Fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notificatio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

I pulled the source code per version and rebase my debdiff on top of "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13". Will attach the new debdiff in a couple of minutes. Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

Rebased debdiff for Xenial (16.04 LTS) ** Patch added: "xenial_debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1607920/+attachment/4750372/+files/lp_1607920_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

@scotte, After some verification, I found out that cking uploaded a patch on Sept 26 on Xenial for another zfs-linux bug[1] using version "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13", which interfere with my debdiff. "pull-lp-source" and "rmadison" didn't shown the existence of "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13". I found it by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

I removed the Xenial debdiff attached to this bug and I will re-do it when current zfs-linux SRU for Xenial by cking will be completed. Until then, the Yakkety debdiff is still fine and can be sponsored. Eric ** Patch removed: "lp1607920_xenial.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

@apw To answer your question: "Also as you are changing MNTTAB is there any reason not to be using that here?" The "reading" is redirected to /proc/self/mounts and the "writing" to /etc/mtab, but if it doesn't exist, that's fine. ZFS just won't update /etc/mtab. Ideally, ZFS should be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

@apw With regard to the translation The commit has been intensively tested in different scenarios/env/... and of course with the "ZFS Test Suite"[1] which include functionality, perf, and stress tests. All the tests were reported as successful. I hope this answer your questions and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

Thanks scotte for the feedbacks. ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

I jointly worked with the zfsonlinux maintainer on a patch that will be merged in 0.7.0 milestone https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/milestone/11?closed=1 #4680, has been tackled in two parts. the first part (patch that will be merge in 0.7.0), change from /etc/mtab to /proc/self/mounts, and keep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

Potential] - * +  * none expected, patch has been merged upstream and ubuntu package has + been tested by people from the community. + + [Other Info] + + * Author: Eric Desrochers <eric.desroch...@canonical.com> - [Other Info] - - * This can likely be resolved in the system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

(see comment #7). [Other Info] - * Author: Eric Desrochers <eric.desroch...@canonical.com> - - * Origin: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/792517389fad5c495a2738b61c2e9c65dedaaa9a +  * Author: Eric Desrochers <eric.desroch...@canonical.com> - * Bug: https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

Debian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839071 ** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ●

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

the problem (see comment #7). + * This is a upstream commit merge in 0.7.0. + +  * A ubuntu package has been tested (including the upstream commit) by a + user of the community facing this bug, and confirmed it addresses the + problem (see comment #7). [Other Info] - -  * Author: Eric Desrochers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

debdiff for devel release : Yakkety (16.10) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided =&g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

As per irc conversation with apw, I'm merging both LPs #1607920 & #1628279 into one debdiff. ** Patch added: "lp1607920_lp1628279_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1607920/+attachment/4753590/+files/lp1607920_lp1628279_xenial.debdiff -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ● zfs-import-scan.service loaded failed failed Import ZFS pools by device

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Rectification, after more investigation here what is happening : Trusty got the random port right away because NSUPDATE is enable at compile time in package "isc-dhcp-client" In Xenial and late (including debian) with commit [b1d5bab630a29f2ca94c458f9402aa43cc5975c4], a new pkg binary package is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

NSUPDATE is disabled in Xenial, will keep the same approach for Trusty and then test. More details can be found here : xenial/isc-dhcp-4.3.3/debian/patches/disable-nsupdate.patch description: undefine NSUPDATE author: cchip origin: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10=95273 bug-debian:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Applying the Xenial "disable-nsupdate.patch" result in a failling build in Trusty. /<>/server/dhcpd.c:498: undefined reference to `trace_ddns_init' dhcpd-failover.o: In function `dhcp_failover_process_bind_update': /<>/server/failover.c:5225: undefined reference to `ddns_removals' Seems like

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

The following debian[1] forum indicate that failover and tracing need to be disabled in order to disable NSUPDATE as well and I confirmed the steps, otherwise the build fails. I'm not too sure if this is the right way to fix this problem as I don't want to introduce new issues that will impact

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1639202] Re: Cannot enlist/commission machines in MAAS 2.1 with usb network adapter

Hi Richard, Thanks for updating the bug with Dave's latest suggestion in order to isolate this particular situation. We will come back to you soon with the next steps. Regards, Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

So long story short, starting with Xenial you have the possibility to install "isc-dhcp-client" which doesn't include the 2 extra port bindings, but if you need it for Dynamic DNS (DDNS) you can optionally install "isc-dhcp-client-ddns". On Trusty, "isc-dhcp-client" combine both. Will ask the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

So long story short, starting with Xenial you have the possibility to install "isc-dhcp-client" which doesn't include the 2 extra port bindings, but if you need it for Dynamic DNS (DDNS) you can optionally install "isc-dhcp-client-ddns". On Trusty, "isc-dhcp-client" combine both, and AFAIK, I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

I was able to identify from where the port range list is initialize, and the decision is taken by binary package "libdns162" (source package "bind9")[1] which dhclient relies on. Basically, it randomly takes any port available between 1024 and 65535[2] So there is a port randomization mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

After more investigation, it seems like the 2 extra port-bindings port assignation decision is made by "libdns" itself. https://github.com/wklaebe/bind9/blob/ac1dcdd124a5abdec4969e2c33836d863bf73aa7/lib/dns/dispatch.c#L1921 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

> But perhaps it would be simpler to provide users a way to disable this functionality manually? Is there any kind of runtime configuration available? At runtime, it doesn't seem to have a way, for instance, I already tried the following without success: do-forward-updates false; # man

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

** Tags removed: raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176046 Title: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports Status in isc-dhcp package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Sound similar to debian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712503 The situation doesn't occur on Xenial (16.04 LTS), but present in Trusty (14.04) as a fix has been first introduce in Ubuntu with version : isc- dhcp (4.3.3-2) Trusty : #netstat -tulp | grep -i dhclient udp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Then NSUPDATE has been re-enable with debian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798237 # changelog isc-dhcp (4.3.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Reenable NSUPDATE (closes: #798237) I will look at both changes, but most likely the one in #798237 seems more suitable for a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

Hi scotte, The fix is now released as shown in comment#25 & #26 Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632766] Re: time in lxc ubuntu template

After a talk with stgraber, this is a due to the fact that the Ubuntu LXC I build are using a pre-generated image which uses UTC by default. If you want to change the time on Xenial, in my case date command or other technic didn't have positive impact. The only thing that work so far is to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632766] Re: time in lxc ubuntu template

LXC Container has been created as follow : $ lxc-create -t download -n trusty -- --dist ubuntu --release trusty --arch amd64 $ lxc-create -t download -n xenial -- --dist ubuntu --release xenial --arch amd64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1632766] [NEW] time in lxc ubuntu template

Public bug reported: With regard to github bug : --- adjust timezone to the host at creation time #47 https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/47 --- I still can reproduce the problem on different HW running Xenial with the LXC ubuntu image Trusty and Xenial. * Bare metal (xenial) $ date Wed Oct 12

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

-ddns : dhclient with DDNS functionality enabled (with random extra ports) Eric ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

** Description changed: + [Impact] + + In trusty, there is only 1 version of dhclient, including #define NSUPDATE, which introduce DDNS functionnality. + The DDNS functionnality, generate 2 random extra ports between 1024-65535. + + Impact reported by users : + + "One impact of these random

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >