** Description changed:
[Impact]
* zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the
deployment image.
* Output from systemd -
sudo systemctl --failed
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION
● zfs-import-scan.service loaded failed failed Import ZFS pools by device
Rebased debdiff for Xenial (16.04 LTS)
** Patch added: "xenial_debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1607920/+attachment/4750372/+files/lp_1607920_xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
I pulled the source code per version and rebase my debdiff on top of
"0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13".
Will attach the new debdiff in a couple of minutes.
Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://b
I removed the Xenial debdiff attached to this bug and I will re-do it
when current zfs-linux SRU for Xenial by cking will be completed.
Until then, the Yakkety debdiff is still fine and can be sponsored.
Eric
** Patch removed: "lp1607920_xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xeni
@scotte,
After some verification, I found out that cking uploaded a patch on Sept
26 on Xenial for another zfs-linux bug[1] using version
"0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13", which interfere with my debdiff.
"pull-lp-source" and "rmadison" didn't shown the existence of
"0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13".
I found it by looking
Debian bug :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839071
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the
deployment image.
* Output from systemd -
sudo systemctl --failed
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION
● zf
debdiff for devel release : Yakkety (16.10)
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided =&g
problem (see comment #7).
+ * This is a upstream commit merge in 0.7.0.
+
+ * A ubuntu package has been tested (including the upstream commit) by a
+ user of the community facing this bug, and confirmed it addresses the
+ problem (see comment #7).
[Other Info]
-
- * Author: Eric Desrochers
(see comment #7).
[Other Info]
- * Author: Eric Desrochers
-
- * Origin:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/792517389fad5c495a2738b61c2e9c65dedaaa9a
+ * Author: Eric Desrochers
- * Bug: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680
+ * Origin:
+
https://github.com
Potential]
- *
+ * none expected, patch has been merged upstream and ubuntu package has
+ been tested by people from the community.
+
+ [Other Info]
+
+ * Author: Eric Desrochers
- [Other Info]
-
- * This can likely be resolved in the systemd init scripts, by modifying
zfs-linux to
I jointly worked with the zfsonlinux maintainer on a patch that will be merged
in 0.7.0 milestone
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/milestone/11?closed=1
#4680, has been tackled in two parts. the first part (patch that will be
merge in 0.7.0), change from /etc/mtab to /proc/self/mounts, and keep
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notificatio
The following has been brought to my attention by a user :
"I got verification from the system test, the fix solves the ldap issue.
Thank you for the fix"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
ht
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tag
To continue my previous comment...
It is reproducible with :
binfmt-support (2.1.6-1)
systemd(229-4ubuntu6)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555760
I don't have the error "Too many levels of symbolic links" when doing an
"ls" command but I do have a problem using "df" on Xenial after
installing Openstack with lxd using "conjure-up"
"df" works fine, but after a reboot, it hangs.
A "strace df" shows that it hangs at doing :
..
stat("/sys/fs/cg
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags
Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:
The user that originally reported the issue on Ubuntu package have tested a
"Test package".
The "Test package" I have builded can be found here : ppa:slashd/fix1593378.
Users feedback :
"We tested the hotfix and looks like it works, the sldap on the CIC with
the fix didn`t crash."
Eric
** De
Here's the debdiff for Trusty which is a cherry picked patch from
upstream VCS.
** Patch added: "lp1593378_trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1593378/+attachment/4687422/+files/lp1593378_trusty.debdiff
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status:
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ The effect of the bug on users is that the program (slapd) terminated
+ with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault when ldapsearch tries to query
+ using multiple language tags.
+
+
+ GDB output:
+ ...
+ Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/slapd -h ldap://:389 l
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Tags added: sts
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
In frame #1
(gdb) p tags
$2 = {{bv_len = 7,
bv_val = 0x7f672c104866
"lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;lang-de;lang-encn;la"...},
{bv_len = 9,
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash
line #272 checks for duplication and jumps to the done label (line #294)
when a duplicate is found.
The code increases 'ntags' without filling in the tags struct with values.
In later iterations this could lead to copying and using uninitialised memory.
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags
I think this upstream commit could be a possible candidate to fix that
issue :
commit 0659ef45d486b5daaafc020cb67b561a8029036d
Author: Howard Chu
Date: Thu Sep 18 00:33:33 2014 +0100
ITS#7941 fix for repeated tags
Make sure ntags isn't incremented if we're skippnig the tag
diff -
Public bug reported:
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/slapd -h ldap://:389 ldap://:389/
ldapi:/// -g o'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 __strncasecmp_l_ssse3 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S:210
210 ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S: No such
The segmentation fault[1] is due to a NULL pointer dereference[2] at :
sudo-1.8.16/plugins/sudoers/pwutil.c[3]
[1] Core was generated by `sudo bash'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7fa01c0a6944 in sudo_getgrgid (gid=7241)
at /build/sudo-g3ghsu/sudo-1.8.16/plug
I confirmed the package "4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2" solve the bug in
Ubuntu Wily
# With port <123 using ntpdate (without patch)
11 Feb 20:30:09 ntpdate[2348]: no server suitable for synchronization found
# With port <123 using ntpdate (including patch)
11 Feb 20:32:18 ntpdate[3243]: adjust time se
I confirmed the package"4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9" solved the problem in
Ubuntu Precise
NTP Version : 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
With no IPTABLES rule ==> Working
$ ntpdate x.x.x.x
11 Feb 16:15:19 ntpdate[1243]: adjust time server x.x.x.x offset 0.190571 sec
With IPTABLES rule ==> Not working
$ i
** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479652
Title:
[patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports
It has been brought to my attention ...
--
I confirm that the proposed testfix package resolved the issue on Trusty.
The test were made on test machines where the client had an iptable postrouting
nat forcing the source port to be under 123.
- ntpdate command performed on the client machine was
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the
packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment
due to NAT.
[Test Case]
The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting
nat
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the
packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment
due to NAT.
[Test Case]
The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting
nat
Patch
--
Distribution : Precise (12.04)
Package version : 4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9
--
** Patch added: "precise_ntp_4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.9"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1479652/+attachment/4556380/+files/lp1479652_precise_3.9.debdiff
--
You received this bug n
Patch
--
Distribution : Wily (15.10)
Package version : 4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2
--
** Patch added: "wily_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu8.2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1479652/+attachment/4556354/+files/lp1479652_wily_8.2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Patch
--
Distribution : Trusty (14.04)
Package version : ntp_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.8
--
Note: kick-d is currently working on a merge for Xenial, including this patch.
I'm including the .debdiffs for the other distributions (W/T/P) for once the
merge for Xenial will be completed.
** Patch
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479652
Title:
[patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus
Status in NTP:
Fix Released
St
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the packet
is silently ignored by ntpd.
+ This is occurring in our environment due to NAT.
+
+ [Test Case]
+
+ The problem can easily be reproduced by having an iptable postrouting
+ nat
I have build a test package for the community to validate it solve the bug
before starting the SRU process [1].
The goal of this testfix is only to confirm that this solve the bug and it is
not a final solution.
Here's what has been brought to my attention about the test package I
have provided.
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received thi
* Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd)
** Changed i
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root
Status in NTP:
Fix Released
Upstream bug:
---
bug #44078: Find fails if executed from a directory on which the user has no
list permissions and exec is an option used[1]
---
Fix:
---
commit 7dc70069a3095a42eadb22b24cb9260c243aff8f
Author: James Youngman
Date: Sat Apr 10 17:15:01 2010 +0100
Exec predicates now store which
Here is the rebase debdiff for Vivid
** Patch added: "Rebase Vivid debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508498/+files/lp1481388_rebase_vivid.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded package
Here is the rebase debdiff for Trusty
** Patch added: "Rebase Trusty debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508494/+files/lp1481388_rebase_trusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Here is the rebase debdiff for Precise
** Patch added: "Rebase Precise debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4508496/+files/lp1481388_rebase_precise.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded p
** Patch removed: "debdiff for precise"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4452908/+files/lp1481388_precise.debdiff
** Patch removed: "debdiff for trusty"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4453392/+files/l
Hi Mathew,
I have the knowledge of the code, I will rebase the debdiffs for V/T/P
Note: I checked and Xenial has the patch already.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Good evening Mathew,
Does it mean I need to re-do the debdiffs ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code aft
Good evening Chris,
This bug has been brought to my attention by someone in the community.
Unfortunately, I never had a confirmation from him if the fix solve his
issue or not... but as state in comment #5 & #11, I've been able to
reproduce the problem and make sure it addressed the situation.
Th
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code
Simon, you may want to add a few ethernet interfaces and static routes.
I was able to reproduce it with ~6 network interface.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Low => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after d
debdiff for wily
** Patch added: "debdiff for wily"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4456187/+files/lp1481388_wily.debdiff
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you a
debdiff for vivid
** Patch added: "debdiff for vivid"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4456186/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp
** Patch removed: "debdiff for Vivid"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4455714/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https
debdiff for Vivid
** Patch added: "debdiff for Vivid"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4455714/+files/lp1481388_vivid.debdiff
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importanc
debdiff for trusty
** Patch added: "1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4453392/+files/lp1481388_trusty.debdiff
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu T
I also noticed the situation can be reproduced at boot if the value of
"net.core.rmem_default" is too low.
I reproduced it by only lowering the "net.core.rmem_default = 2000"
value with 6 network interface at boot.
ntpd[851]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16
nt
debdiff for precise
** Patch added: "debdiff for precise"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1481388/+attachment/4452908/+files/lp1481388_precise.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp
debdiff for precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root
Status in ntp package in Ubu
debdiff for precise
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * User experienced repeated segfaults at the same instruction pointer
+
+ i/o error on routing socket No buffer space available - disabling
+ segfault at 31 ip 0031 sp 79f11788 error 14 in
libpthread-2.15.so[7f967
debdiff for precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481388
Title:
NTP : Use-after-free in routing socket code after dropping root
Status in ntp package in Ubu
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (eric-desrochers-z)
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Vivid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (eric-desrochers-z)
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You rece
to increase the "net.core.rmem_max" and
"net.core.wmem_max"values equally until the "routing socket reports: No
buffer space available" message no longer showed up.
[1] 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu3.4+20150820lp1481388~2
https://launchpad.net/~eric-desrochers-z/+archive/ubuntu/lp14
701 - 770 of 770 matches
Mail list logo
