[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916485] Re: test -x fails inside shell scripts in containers

2021-02-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The other question is whether the change in glibc should be rolled back such that it works when invoked in older container hosts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] [NEW] Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-02-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly. [Test plan] Run the integration test suite (the autopk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876035] Re: Automatically retry downloads on failures

2021-02-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876035 Title: Automatically retry downloads on failures Status in apt package in Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1779767] Re: Default cron PATH does not include /snap/bin

2021-02-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: anacron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779767 Title: Default cron PATH does not include

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898026 Title: interruption of dist-upgrade can leav

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: + [Impact] + There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was entirely successful. + + We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any + + [Test plan] + We have included a test in the test-suite in test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that war

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up. [Test case] + For the S

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Re: Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050 Title: Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Re: Cache not generated for all translations

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850 Title: Cache not generated for all translations

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: - As a long-time-user of ?ubuntu, with apt-get as tool of choice for updates/upgrades I wrote a daily script for updates, with 'dist-upgrade'. + [Impact] + Calling update() or installing packages from apt clients resets their SIGINT and SIGQUIT handlers to SIG_DFL, overr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900 Title: apt-get update should return exit code !

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381 Title: apt-get autoremove may r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1589204] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade and apt full-upgrade not reporting held back package

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1415701] Re: apt is unable to handle CDROMS with default mount option

2021-03-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415701 Title: apt is unable to handle CDROMS with defaul

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918112] [NEW] Deal with rred shortcomings around empty patch files

2021-03-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] Merge request https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/159 has a bunch of fixes for empty pdiff files, cleaning up pdiff files, as well as correcting some bugs with index files in the mirror method. While we don't use pdiffs ourselves, third party rep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918112] Re: Deal with rred shortcomings around empty patch files

2021-03-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We're actually not backporting this to stable releases just future stable one :) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly. + + On focal, we also introduce the actual supp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
For the record, we are going to roll the apt change out in groovy shortly, but delay the LTS updates to give it some more real world testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-03-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due to useless immedi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-03-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Corrected the task for bionic as per policy (in progress means SRU uploaded). I'll be working on the bionic SRU tomorrow, I've just prepared SRUs for groovy and focal for other issues, and will be cherry-picking these patches on top of those :) -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] [NEW] Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] APT 1.6-2.0 deny third-party repositories from changing their Suite value. This change was reverted in later apt releases, and will be reverted in 1.8 in Debian as well, so for consistency, we want to push that change to stable [Test plan] We added test cases to ou

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Re: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] [NEW] Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change. [Test plan] Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which includes the changed test. [Where problems cou

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Re: Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This is fixed in 2.2.2 which will be synced ASAP, but this bug was created after 2.2.2 and hence is not closed in the changelog. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Re: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Fixed since 2.1.10, which is in groovy already. ** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1829860] Re: APT unlocks in same order as it locks

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829860 Title: APT unlocks in same order as it locks Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918928] [NEW] APT 2021/03 SRU release scheduling

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: We want to release the APT SRUs from Mar 2021 in a staggered manner, such that we have 2-3 days between each release to get more chance to discover regressions before rolling out to older releases. Hence this bug, which we tag block-proposed-{bionic,focal} and then untag once

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1779767] Re: Default cron PATH does not include /snap/bin

2021-03-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: cron (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: anacron (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cron in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
That's simply not true. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219 Title: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Triaged B

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There is no bug there, this is all working correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219 Title: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow Status in apt p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219 Title: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's slow because it loads the entire depcache, and checks all dependencies. This can be avoided by refactoring the code, but it seems unnecessary. I'd rather add useful features like telling you which packages become autoremovable garbage after marking something, rather than refactoring the code t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's also imaginable that we might change the value from e.g. 1 to yes. I don't know why it's an integer. In any case, I'd say you can't rely on that file at all. It might get changed in format, renamed or removed entirely without any notice. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713219] Re: 'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show' is slow

2021-03-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There is no performance issue with the file format, the parsing is not noticeable. There is a massive design problem in the DepCache having to visit every dependency in the cache and do marking stuff. This worked fine for tiny sets, but scales superlinear to package count. That's a very long time

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920601] Re: Frequent test failures caused by networking issues on armhf runners

2021-03-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We can set Acquire::Retries in apt.conf like Debian does for debci now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920601 Title: Frequent test failures caused by networkin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 451366] Re: 404 from the archive is not handled well

2021-03-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Mathew, please don't mark unrelated bugs as duplicates. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1693900 apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: apt install - File has unexpected size - http pipeline

2021-03-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please let me know if you can reproduce this with 2.2.2 in hirsute. No changes can be made to the http method in stable releases, as it's super fragile - Every time we make changes, something else breaks. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notif

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: apt install - File has unexpected size - http pipeline

2021-03-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Managing to get a reproducer for HTTP issues more than a couple of hours has not really worked so far, and most people's reproducers don't work. It's highly subjective to network latency and MTU afaict. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: apt install - File has unexpected size - http pipeline

2021-03-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
> I don't have that mirrored, but I have focal, and I could not reproduce. Apt 2.0.2 There have been no relevant changes between 1.6.y and 2.0.y, so it really should reproduce with both of them or none of them. But you have to be careful that the download is _exactly_ the same, usually by pointin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: apt install - File has unexpected size - http pipeline

2021-03-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We tracked this down to the Pulp repository not having Size fields. While this is a broken repository, APT should also more gracefully handle that situation, either by warning about missing Size values, erroring out, disabling pipelining; or by fixing pipelining to behave if we don't know the size

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921773] Re: apt upgrade clears a hold on an uninstalled snapd

2021-03-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This was fixed in dpkg (1.20.6) unstable; urgency=medium * libdpkg: Do not forget not-installed packages that are set on hold. Reported by David Kalnischkies . ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu) -- You recei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The autopkgtests for apt have passed, so testing succeeded. I retried the failures, I expect them to be unrelated: apport one already happened with binutils/2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.5, the i386 retry succeeded; and reprotest fails in its normal way, a few retries should get it working. ** Tags remove

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The autopkgtests for apt have passed, so testing succeeded. I retried the failures, I expect them to be unrelated: apport one already happened with binutils/2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.5, the i386 retry succeeded; and reprotest fails in its normal way, a few retries should get it working. ** Tags removed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Re: Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt have passed, so validation was successful. I'm confident the autopkgtest failures are unrelated intermittent ones; I've done some more retries. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt have passed, so validation was successful. I'm confident the autopkgtest failures are unrelated intermittent ones; I've done some more retries. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Re: Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt have passed, so validation was successful. I'm confident the autopkgtest failures are unrelated intermittent ones; I've done some more retries. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Re: Cache not generated for all translations

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt have passed, so validation was successful. I'm confident the autopkgtest failures are unrelated intermittent ones; I've done some more retries. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Re: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apt's tests failed, I believe the regressions are just intermittent unrelated issues. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notificatio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Re: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Oops, of course apt's test passed, hence verification done :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918907 Title: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: verification-donefocal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725 Title: Protected/Important packages are n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877987] Re: apt search coredumping

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Can't exactly verify as we did not get another reproducer, but marking it as verified anyway ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The small simple script also worked with the proposed version: # python3 a.py WAITING ^CSeen KeyboardInterrupt() END ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I checked do-release-upgrade -d before upgrading apt, and pressing Ctrl+C at the prompt for conforming changes left hirsute in sources.list. I upgraded to apt 2.1.10ubuntu0.3 from proposed, ran it again, and Ctrl+C now caused the restore code to run: Continue [yN] Details [d]^C Restoring origin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806076] Re: unattended-upgrade --help raises UnicodeEncodeError when stdout encoding is ascii

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I installed 1.6.13 and could verify that the regression wrt --help is fixed. unattended-upgrades still logged a lot of errors because for some reason gettext returned utf8 despite being on non-UTF-8 locale, but that's all from the APT side. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806076] Re: unattended-upgrade --help raises UnicodeEncodeError when stdout encoding is ascii

2021-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Log: + /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily lock_is_held update --- L

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1922380] Re: remove shim-signed very difficult

2021-04-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
OK it seems you were actually complaining that French did not work for you. Have you tried entering it manually? Chances are copying messes things up. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete ** Package changed: shim-signed (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) -- You receive

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1922380] Re: remove shim-signed very difficult

2021-04-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There is no force option in apt, you can use --force-remove-essential to avoid enterinh the text but it's obviously dangerous to do so. As the --force message clearly stated, it comes from dpkg - which is told to force deinstallation by apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: apt install - File has unexpected size - http pipeline

2021-04-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I tracked it down further today, accidentally finding a reproducer. In methods/http.cc we check for Req.DownloadSize > Req.MaximumSize and fail with an error if that's the case; hence ensuring our download was within the allowed range for the request. The issue is that Req.MaximumSize is calculate

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1922786] Re: Apt install of local deb files shows a notification causing confusion

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Low ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920601] Re: Frequent test failures caused by networking issues on armhf runners

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We set Acquire::Retries to 10 on autopkgtest. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Re: Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920 Title: Harden test for no new acquires after tr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918928] Re: APT 2021/03 SRU release scheduling

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
All the SRUs were released the same day, block tags were ignored :-( ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918930] Re: Unexpected file size of one package interrupts update process for all packages and leaves system vulnerable

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918930 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1854772] Re: /var/lib/dpkg/status has faulty entries

2021-04-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The status file seems fine, apt is happy with it, this is either a bug in apt-listchanges or a specific FS corruption, but haven't seen that before. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => apt-listchanges (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt-listchanges (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others

2021-04-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921626 Title: size mismatch error if request of unk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others

2021-04-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Downloads fail if: + + - there is at least one package each with Size and no size on a mirror + - a package without a Size field is larger than a package with a Size field that's currently in the pipeline + + Also, this was silent, we need to add an error

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923150] Re: unexpected error pop-up after 'apt install nvidia-driver-455'

2021-04-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It seems you are not using libapt-pkg6.0 in version 2.1.10ubuntu0.2 or later? This issue was fixed in that version. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923150] Re: unexpected error pop-up after 'apt install nvidia-driver-455'

2021-04-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I mean 2.0.4, of course, which is included in the current LTS images (20.04.2); your image is the previous version (20.04.1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192315

[Touch-packages] [Bug 310262] Re: APT::Acquire::Retries only applies to archives and source files

2021-04-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This was fixed in Version: 1.6~alpha6 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310262 Title: A

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923150] Re: unexpected error pop-up after 'apt install nvidia-driver-455'

2021-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Marking the packaging tags as invalid, as the bug is fixed in apt 2.0.4 which is in the 20.04.2 images. This bug was tracked as bug 1871268 back when it was being fixed. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 (Ubuntu) Sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1924809] Re: apt 2.0.5 in focal causes autopkgtest failures for update-manager

2021-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Can confirm it's broken: ^['linux-.*'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ 'kfreebsd-.*'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ 'gnumach-.*'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ '.*-modules'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ '.*-kernel'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ 'linux-.*'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ 'kfreebsd-.*'-5\.4\.0-72-generic$|^ 'gnumach-.*'-5\ .4\.0-72-g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923150] Re: unexpected error pop-up after 'apt install nvidia-driver-455'

2021-04-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yes, of course if you don't install the fixed version you still have the broken one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923150 Title: unexpected error pop-up afte

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925025] Re: package packagekit 1.1.13-2ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2021-04-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks for your bug report. Unfortunately, it lacks any actionable information, because we don't know why packagekit is in a very bad inconsistent state. If you figure out the cause for this, please let us know. Thanks! ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923464] Re: ideally should boot rootfs from a matching hard drive

2021-04-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This proposal seems somewhat incompatible with our resilient boot specification. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923464 Title: ideally should boot rootfs f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923358] Re: Other servers doesn't display server list (Software Updater)

2021-04-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => software-properties (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923358 Title: Other servers doesn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I don't understand what python-apt does here, it inherits zstd support from apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923845 Title: Please compress packages wit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There seems to be a bug in bionic's apt. root@bb:/home/jak/Projects# python3 -c 'import apt_inst, apt_pkg; apt_pkg.init(); apt_inst.DebFile("glibc-doc-reference_2.33-0ubuntu2_zstd1_all.deb").control.extractdata("control")' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in LookupError: Th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I have not tested hirsute in a clean container; but touch /usr/bin/zstd makes it work, so the compressor lookup is broken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923845

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-11-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We do not have a fix for this yet. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Inst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-11-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
2.1.12 will be landing in hirsute tomorrow-ish, once it syncs from Debian unstable. This fixes _this_ bug, namely immediate configuration of _foreign_ architecture packages, by disabling the code that forces them to be configured together with their native architecture siblings. It does _not_ fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876495] Re: bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for APT

2020-11-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bash-completion (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importanc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-11-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => New ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906315] Re: apt update hangs on Turkish lang

2020-11-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Need like an strace and a term log to analyze ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906315 Title: apt u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906315] Re: apt update hangs on Turkish lang

2020-11-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
/var/log/apt/term.log that is -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906315 Title: apt update hangs on Turkish lang Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

2020-12-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
> I probably don't, but have no idea want it actually does. It provides safe access to files on your disk to snaps or flatpaks. > You can silence this with "df -x fuse.portal" Odd, when I tried it didn't work for me, maybe I made a typo. Added a task for coreutils - we should ignore fuse.portal

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

2020-12-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623 Title: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

2020-12-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Just to note, a huge number of other file systems don't show: $ grep fuse /proc/mounts fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 https://sd2dav.1und1.de/ /media/jak/smartdrive fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=1000,allow_other,max_read=

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907496] Re: python-apt-common 2.1.3ubuntu1.1 Ubuntu.info doesn't have 'groovy'

2020-12-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] [NEW] Cache not generated for all translations

2020-12-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be available for translated descriptions. [Test case] # apt install locales-all # get the locale # export LANG=sv_SE.UT

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sebastián Astudillo (zhoku) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => New -- Y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The first chance to fix it was in August, the next chance to fix it is in February. There's really no urgency here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There is an easy workaround, too: just don't check the box to install third party drivers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You'll be able to install the driver after having rebooted and upgraded the distribution. You don't have to (and can't atm) do it _during_ install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907676] Re: segmentation fault when opening fd

2020-12-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yes the security team has the packages ready to go out for a week now essentially. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907676 Title: segmentation fault when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907676] Re: segmentation fault when opening fd

2020-12-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Eric, the updates are built ready in the security team PPA since Dec 10 and only need to be released. I've subscribed security team, but you might want to talk to them directly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907676] Re: segmentation fault when opening fd

2020-12-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
They prepared the updates on the same day as the fix (well the full regression fix with the follow-up commits) but did not roll out the fix so far because only dak reported a regression and codesearch did not yield any other users of that interface. -- You received this bug notification because y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1909173] Re: Python-apt for Python2.x is missing from repositories for Groovy

2020-12-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Support for Python 2 was dropped system-wide. ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909173 Tit

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >