The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that
The verification of the Stable Release Update for software-properties
has completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that
An upload of account-plugins to xenial-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "incomplete conffile
handling; see bug log for details.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
An upload of gnome-control-center-signon to xenial-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "incomplete
conffile handling; see bug log for details.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Here is my output for /etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.don a 16.10 desktop
system that was upgraded from 16.04:
$ dpkg -S /etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/*
account-plugin-google: /etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/accounts.google.com.conf
account-plugin-twitter:
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted logrotate into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/3.8.7-2ubuntu2.16.10.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted logrotate into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/3.8.7-1ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted logrotate into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/3.8.7-2ubuntu2.16.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Ok, I've succeeded in verifying this by adding an artificial
ExecStartPre=/bin/sleep 10 to both old and new resolvconf.service. Old:
# journalctl -o short-precise --unit resolvconf.service --unit
network-online.target --unit systemd-networkd-wait-online.service --unit
systemd-networkd.service
debdiff for yakkety. In order to ensure the correct upgrade semantics,
this needs to go to the security pocket.
** Patch added: "software-properties-1679784-yakkety.debdiff"
Running the test case from the bug description for a yakkety container,
this is the behavior I see with the yakkety-updates version of nplan:
-- Logs begin at Thu 2017-04-20 05:38:36 UTC, end at Thu 2017-04-20 05:40:08
UTC. --
Apr 20 05:38:36.302406 y1 systemd[1]: Started Nameserver information
I've tested this now in a 16.10 VM, and I can't verify this SRU because
I can't confirm the buggy behavior. Adjusting the journalctl command
for changed unit names in 16.10, I get:
# journalctl -o short-precise --unit resolvconf.service --unit
network-online.target --unit
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1615482 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615482
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1615482
apt-daily timer runs at random hours of the day
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
How do you provision the nodes in linode? Do you use cloud-init? cloud-
init interacts with the network-online.target, so that could be related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:55:45PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> While we're at it, we could also push the times 2 hours more outside, to
> 4 and 20. So, something like this would probably be an improvement:
> [Unit]
> Description=Daily apt activities
> After=network.target
>
> [Timer]
>
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-17.10
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Foundations Team
(canonical-foundations)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Marking this 'high' and a regression. This had been deliberately
engineered in Ubuntu to run once per day outside of normal work hours,
with a random offset <1h to spread out the mirror load. The current
behavior is not consistent with that design, and can be disruptive to
the regular use of the
Marking this 'high' and a regression. This had been deliberately
engineered in Ubuntu to run once per day outside of normal work hours,
with a random offset <1h to spread out the mirror load. The current
behavior is not consistent with that design, and can be disruptive to
the regular use of the
The debdiff looks good, but have reviewed the upstream delta and agreed
with Tiago that this should wait until after the zesty release.
Unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ncurses in
The verification of the Stable Release Update for shim-signed has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
No need to file bugs for binary removals, these are processed
automatically (and this has been done for the packages listed here).
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Public bug reported:
In cases where we don't prompt the user for a timezone value, the tzdata
package should have a default value - Etc/UTC, which debootstrap
currently populates for us but should really be handled in the package.
This matters more now that we are demoting tzdata from the
Hi Vasant,
> Aug 9 01:28:43 abc systemd-udevd[19870]: Process '/bin/touch
/var/lib/lsvpd/run.vpdupdate' failed with exit code 1.
What does the filesystem layout look like on this system? Is it possible
that you see this failing because it's running before /var/lib is
mounted?
Alternatively, is
Public bug reported:
Since version 2017a-1, tzdata will clean up /etc/localtime on purge.
But it leaves behind /etc/timezone, despite the fact that in some cases
it creates this file. I think tzdata should own removing it on purge
also.
** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
This bug report is about resolved not resolving CNAME records. If you
are seeing issues with resolved and DNSSEC, please follow LP: #1682499
instead.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- RM Upstart, obsolete, superseeded by systemd
+ RM Upstart, obsolete, superseded by systemd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
Info]
* Related bug reports and history:
- bug #1615482
- bug #1554848
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) => Steve Lan
Landing the apt piece of this without the unattended-upgrades piece has
regressed the around-the-clock distribution of unattended-upgrades
downloads (which is enabled by default for security updates in 16.04).
The plan is to follow up with unattended-upgrades SRU today to get this
all landed
Removing packages from artful:
unity8 8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu3 in artful
indicators-client 8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu3 in artful amd64
indicators-client 8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu3 in artful arm64
indicators-client
Removing packages from artful:
ubuntu-push 0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu3 in artful
golang-ubuntu-push-dev 0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu3 in artful
amd64
golang-ubuntu-push-dev 0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu3 in artful
arm64
golang-ubuntu-push-dev
Removing packages from artful:
pay-service 15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2 in artful
libpay2 15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2 in artful amd64
libpay2 15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2 in artful arm64
libpay2 15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2 in artful
Removing packages from artful:
tone-generator 1.5.4+15.10.20150731-0ubuntu2 in artful
tone-generator 1.5.4+15.10.20150731-0ubuntu2 in artful amd64
tone-generator 1.5.4+15.10.20150731-0ubuntu2 in artful arm64
tone-generator
Removing packages from artful:
ubuntuone-credentials 15.11+17.04.20161107ubuntu1 in artful
account-plugin-ubuntuone 15.11+17.04.20161107ubuntu1 in artful
amd64
account-plugin-ubuntuone 15.11+17.04.20161107ubuntu1 in artful
arm64
Removing packages from artful:
telephony-service 0.1+17.04.20161213.1-0ubuntu1 in artful
qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-telephony-phonenumber0.1
0.1+17.04.20161213.1-0ubuntu1 in artful amd64
qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-telephony-phonenumber0.1
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414
Title:
update-initramfs
Removing packages from artful:
unity-scopes-shell 0.5.8+17.04.20170310-0ubuntu2 in artful
libscope-harness-dev 0.5.8+17.04.20170310-0ubuntu2 in artful
amd64
libscope-harness-dev 0.5.8+17.04.20170310-0ubuntu2 in artful
arm64
The referenced upstream bug report shows that upstream agrees this is a
regression in systemd behavior which they are planning to correct, which
is reasonable.
However, I think this is also a bug in the kdump-tools package.
'default.target' is a meta-target, which no package can know whether
it's
** Tags removed: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686470
Title:
Apt updates that are uniformly spread across all timezones,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1679435 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679435
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1646739
"Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1679435
GNOME Software fails to install
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1679435 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679435
If this is gnome-software, then this should be fixed already in gnome-
software 3.20.1+git20170427.0.3d09239-0ubuntu1~xenial1
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1679435
GNOME Software fails
An upload of shim-signed to trusty-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "needs adjusted versioned dep on
grub2-common; drop ref to LP: #1624096 from changelog".
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in:
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted shim-signed into trusty-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-
signed/1.32~14.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Marking verification-failed based on LP: #1703088. If this should turn
out not to be a regression, please reset the tag.
However, this package is also a candidate for removal from -proposed due
to its lack of verification after 4 months. If someone is interested in
seeing this SRU released, the
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MAYANK SHUKLA (mayankgonda) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
Title:
debconf: DbDriver
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted shim-signed into trusty-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-
signed/1.32~14.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)
--
You
LP: #1704677 is reported as a regression in this SRU. Marking
verification failed pending resolution.
** Tags removed: verification-done-xenial
** Tags added: verification-failed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:06:52PM -, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> This is bit of a funky SRU (IMO). It seems like we want version 2 (from
> the linked repository) in all releases > 12.04. However, given that is
> not yet present in any release != 12.04, I'm not sure we need to worry
> about the
The upstream commit message notes: "None of the warnings should cause
e2fsprogs malfunction given a sane compiler running on architectures
that Linux can support. Still, it's better to clean up to code than
not."
We would therefore not cherry-pick this change from upstream into an SRU
to 16.04
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
Title:
debconf: DbDriver "config":
** Summary changed:
- udevadm trigger subsystem-match=net doesn't always run rules
+ udevadm trigger subsystem-match=net doesn't always run rules because of
reconfiguration rate-limiting
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Artful)
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681528
Title:
Include information about python versions
** Tags removed: rls-aa-incoming
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696981
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685484
Title:
DHCP exit hook for setting
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into trusty-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/ubuntu-advantage-tools/2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693361
Title:
cloud-init sometimes fails
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:48:22PM -, Scott Moser wrote:
> I think that resolvconf should be listed here, as it Depends on ifupdown.
> also resolvconf is rdepend'd on by ubuntu-minimal, so I think that
> ubuntu-meta probably needs another bump.
The intent is to drop resolvconf from minimal.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: kirill (kirill-yalta) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
Title:
debconf: DbDriver
Hello Jim, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jim, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jim, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
** Description changed:
=== Begin SRU Template ===
[Impact]
A cloud-config that contains packages to install (see below) or
'package_upgrade' will run 'apt-get update'. That can sometimes fail as a
result of contention with the apt-daily.service that updates that information.
** Also affects: python2.7 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python3.5 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python2.7 (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python3.5 (Ubuntu
** Changed in: python3.5 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682934
Title:
python3 in
** Summary changed:
- No pop-up window to warn users that system should not reboot or shutdown
while installing security updates
+ unattended-upgrades does not block shutdown of system, as it is designed to
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.3-0ubuntu8.6 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.4-0ubuntu4.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ok sounds like this needs to be addressed in netplan.
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => nplan (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: nplan (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: nplan (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: nplan (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
So apt does not support being used on a system where a given
sources.list entry might be marked root-only to conceal HTTP
username/password?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:05:43PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Not really, we told everyone years ago to use the netrc for that.
Sorry, what is 'netrc'? I've never heard of this, and while I'm not closely
involved in apt development, I don't find any reference to 'netrc' in the
apt.conf
Why should apt update be run twice a day if the updates are only applied to the
system once a day? This would be:
- a no-op for any metadata that hasn't changed in the preceding 12h
- a wasteful, redundant download for metadata that *has* changed in the
preceding 12h
- (in rare cases) very
I have removed the apt SRU from {xenial,yakkety}-proposed per the
preceding comment.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are
done, thanks!
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615482
Title:
apt-daily timer runs at
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I think the "locking" is already done by systemd. When units specify an
> ordering, it seems that one unit will only start when the other has shut
> down:
> "Given two units with any ordering dependency between them, if one
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:20:47PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> pabs just mentioned in #debian-apt that we could probably drop the
> ConditionACPower for the downloading service. I'm not sure why that was
> originally added, if only to protect upgrades or to save power when
> downloading,
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Is this perhaps fixed via bug #1516095?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534946
Title:
pcimodules: broken; 'kmod' depmod doesn't generate a modules.pcimap
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-16.04.3
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-meta into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
meta/1.267.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
An upload of ubuntu-meta to precise-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "unexpected changes to desktop
seed".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
$ ubuntu-advantage
usage: ubuntu-advantage [enable-esm|disable-esm]
Enable or disable the Ubuntu Extended Security Maintenance archive.
Parameters:
enable-esm enable the ESM repository
disable-esmdisable the ESM repository
the argument must be in the form "user:password"
$
discussed the above error with the team:
- non-x86 multiarch is a quite minor use case on precise
- it is not clear that esm.ubuntu.com is intended to be x86-only, or that it
will remain so indefinitely
So we will not limit the sources.list.d entry by architecture, which
could do more harm than
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
software-properties does not display debconf prompts. while most debconf
prompts have default answers and this is fine, for installing dkms modules on a
SecureBoot-capable system we specifically have a critical debconf prompt with
no possible
Confirmed this test case for yakkety, with the modification that I was
using a liveCD so update-manager couldn't install all the packages due
to space and I fell back to installing with apt-get, after confirming
that the packages did show up in the update-manager UI for installation.
--
You
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Justification]
+ software-properties does not display debconf prompts. while most debconf
prompts have default answers and this is fine, for installing dkms modules on a
SecureBoot-capable system we specifically have a critical debconf prompt with
no possible
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
software-properties does not display debconf prompts. while most debconf
prompts have default answers and this is fine, for installing dkms modules on a
SecureBoot-capable system we specifically have a critical debconf prompt with
no possible
Per bdmurray's guidance, I have also now tested through update-manager,
by unselecting those packages not needed to be upgraded to test this,
and confirmed that I get the right result this way also. (Selecting
software-properties-gtk for installation is sufficient for update-
manager to
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
software-properties does not display debconf prompts. while most debconf
prompts have default answers and this is fine, for installing dkms modules on a
SecureBoot-capable system we specifically have a critical debconf prompt with
no possible
Removing packages from artful:
qtubuntu-sensors 0.6+17.04.20170113-0ubuntu1 in artful
qtubuntu-sensors 0.6+17.04.20170113-0ubuntu1 in artful amd64
qtubuntu-sensors 0.6+17.04.20170113-0ubuntu1 in artful arm64
qtubuntu-sensors
Removing packages from artful:
usensord 1.1+16.10.20160928.1-0ubuntu1 in artful
golang-usensord-dev 1.1+16.10.20160928.1-0ubuntu1 in artful
amd64
golang-usensord-dev 1.1+16.10.20160928.1-0ubuntu1 in artful
arm64
golang-usensord-dev
Removing packages from artful:
mtp 0.0.4+16.04.20160413-0ubuntu5 in artful
libmtpserver-dev 0.0.4+16.04.20160413-0ubuntu5 in artful amd64
libmtpserver-dev 0.0.4+16.04.20160413-0ubuntu5 in artful arm64
libmtpserver-dev
Removing packages from artful:
ubuntu-touch-customization-hooks 0.7+17.04.20161213-0ubuntu1 in artful
ubuntu-touch-customization-hooks 0.7+17.04.20161213-0ubuntu1 in
artful amd64
ubuntu-touch-customization-hooks 0.7+17.04.20161213-0ubuntu1 in
artful arm64
This package has already been removed from artful.
** Changed in: unity-scope-mediascanner (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scope-mediascanner
in Ubuntu.
901 - 1000 of 3325 matches
Mail list logo
